[META] Wrong page splitting / Missing page content when printing
Categories
(Core :: Printing: Output, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: jmdesp, Unassigned)
References
(Depends on 28 open bugs)
Details
(Keywords: meta)
Reporter | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Updated•14 years ago
|
Updated•14 years ago
|
Updated•14 years ago
|
Comment hidden (offtopic) |
Comment 6•5 years ago
|
||
Investopedia also only prints the first page
https://www.investopedia.com/why-value-investing-model-championed-by-buffett-is-broken-4691764
However it does work with simplify page.
Comment 7•5 years ago
|
||
That Investopedia one is bug 939897. (They use display:flex
on <body>
and <main>
, and if I override those to use display:block
instead, then it doesn't get truncated.)
Comment 9•5 years ago
|
||
This URL prints only the first page, seen on 69.0 on Mac OS X 10.14.6 (BuildVersion: 18G95).
https://help.sap.com/doc/00f68c2e08b941f081002fd3691d86a7/2019.19/en-US/11b4e5ff76eb4747bc255d7037be1f01.html
Comment 10•5 years ago
|
||
ahem, sorry, I just realized this one has a "META" tag. Can someone please educate me what the procedure is here? Should I report this a new bug, and create in that new bug a reference to here, or is the comment here enough?
Comment 11•5 years ago
|
||
hey Florenz, I believe the comment here is good enough.
If you have the time to investigate further, and then you realize the problem comes from another root issue we haven't uncovered yet (so isn't covered by dependent bugs), then a separate bug would be useful.
Thanks for your contribution :)
Comment 12•5 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Florenz Kley from comment #11)
This URL prints only the first page, seen on 69.0 on Mac OS X 10.14.6 (BuildVersion: 18G95).
https://help.sap.com/doc/00f68c2e08b941f081002fd3691d86a7/2019.19/en-US/11b4e5ff76eb4747bc255d7037be1f01.html
FWIW, when this page is shown in Print Preview mode it only indicates that one page is to be printed. In other words, page 1 of 1. This same behavior was note in IE11 and Firefox version-de-jour on my work station. I would suggest that this behavior may be normal for this page (i.e., the author has coded the page intentionally to prevent printing the entire content from the web perhaps because they offer it for sale separately). Just an observation.
Comment 13•5 years ago
|
||
After seeing the last comment, I confirmed the same behavior of that page on:
MacOS High Sierra 10.13.6 (17G8030) with Google Chrome 76.0.3809.132 (Official Build) (64-bit)
MacOS High Sierra 10.13.6 (17G8030) with Firefox 69.0 (64-bit)
MacOS High Sierra 10.13.6 (17G8030) with Safari 12.1.2 (13607.3.10)
McaOS Mojave 10.14.5 (18F132) with Safari 12.1.1 (14607.2.6.1.1)
Windows 7 Professional SP1 with Google Chrome 77.0.3865.90 (Official Build) (64-bit)
Windows 7 Professional SP1 with Firefox 69.0 (32-bit)
Windows 7 Professional SP1 with Firefox 69.0.1 (32-bit)
Windows 7 Professional SP1 with Internet Explorer 11.0.9600_19431
So it really looks like the page really does something that hoses printing on all of the above web browsers. It is still a bug that this behavior occurs, but -- like the bug that Teardrop attack of several years ago exploited -- it seems to be extremely widespread (although fortunately of much less severe impact).
Comment 14•5 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jim Scott from comment #14)
I would suggest that this behavior may be normal for this page (i.e., the author has coded the page intentionally to
prevent printing the entire content from the web perhaps because they offer it for sale separately). Just an observation.
yes, SAP is a software vendor, but no, that page is free to view anonymously, no logon credentials required
Comment 15•5 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jim Scott from comment #14)
I would suggest that this behavior may be normal for this page (i.e., the author has coded the page intentionally to
prevent printing the entire content from the web perhaps because they offer it for sale separately). Just an observation.
reported it as SAP incident 537216 / 2019 (in a system for SAP customers) , and I will ask directly if that is intended behavior or not. Also mentioned this bug in the incident, as soon as I hear something back I will post it here.
Comment 16•5 years ago
|
||
That SAP page simply has all of its content inside of an overflow:auto
element (i.e. a scrollable element) which is sized to fit in the viewport (top:91px; bottom: 0
), which in the case of a printed document is the first page. When viewed in a browser, you can reach all the content via scrolling that element, but of course there is no scrollbar in the printed output.
So indeed, browsers are all printing it "correctly", and SAP probably wants to add a "print" media query to turn off that overflow:auto
styling (and perhaps some other styling).
In any case: let's please not have further discussion/investigation of individual issues on this bug, since this is a meta-bug. Best to spin off individual bugs per-issue so that this bug's comment-thread doesn't become a giant wall of different investigations. Thanks!
Comment 17•4 years ago
|
||
when using "cups-pdf" or "save as adobe pdf" (with adobe acrobat x pro) to print this site here
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20190403-israels-politicians-are-chickens-we-need-to-shake-up-the-system-says-hadashs-jewish-candidate/
on mac osx 10.6.8 and with camino browser
only page 0/1 is printed the rest is truncated.
Comment 18•4 years ago
|
||
Sorry if this is the wrong place to report this, but I don't know if it is a duplicate of any of the other print truncation bugs. Regardless, I hope it is a useful additional reproduction. This page: https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/1855931/12-dice-are-so-light-and-portable-you-can-always-h looks correct when using dev mode to preview as a printed document, but truncates after the first page (printing the first page, and a nearly empty second page) when printing to a PDF (and presumably when printing in general, although I haven't tested that).
Comment 19•4 years ago
|
||
Oops, I should have checked my pending updates. I was on 77. On Firefox 78, the page also does not print properly, but in a totally different way. Now it seems to get truncated in random places, and chop out assorted parts of the pages, while printing other pages as blank. Still, the changes suggests that this issue is being worked on, which I really appreciate. Again, I hope that the above link is a useful test case for you.
Comment 20•3 years ago
|
||
CrorePati also only prints the first page
https://www.crorpati.com/passive-income-ideas/
However it does work with simplify page.
Comment hidden (obsolete) |
Comment 22•3 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Pritam Datta from comment #22)
CrorePati also only prints the first page
https://www.crorpati.com/passive-income-ideas/
However it does work with simplify page.
Why this comment marked as spam. I was facing the issue. But may be there was problem with my profile. I have changed my profile & also updated to the current version. Now Its working good.
Comment 23•3 years ago
|
||
(In reply to B.J. Herbison from comment #23)
(In reply to Pritam Datta from comment #22)
CrorePati also only prints the first page
https://www.crorpati.com/passive-income-ideas/
However it does work with simplify page.I didn't want to send it to an actual printer, when I selected "save to file" a 28 page PDF was created. What happens if you save to a file? If you only get only the first page try in Troubleshooting mode or a new profile.
Thanks for your genuine feedback & support.
Comment 25•3 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Pritam Datta from comment #24)
Why this comment marked as spam. I was facing the issue.
Sorry -- looks like somebody misunderstood your comment and thought you were a spammer; people post links with all sorts of weird ads on bugzilla, and your "passive-income-ideas" link probably looked like that, at first glance.
In any case, I've removed the spam
annotation from your comment.
But may be there was problem with my profile. I have changed my profile & also updated to the current version. Now Its working good.
Glad to hear it! I tried the site that you mentioned and didn't see any missing content, so I suspect all is well now.
In the future: if you or anyone else encounter a bug of this type, please don't add a comment here -- instead, it's best to file a dedicated bug for your issue, using the "New/Clone" button at the top of this page, with the "...that blocks this bug" menu entry.
Updated•2 years ago
|
Description
•