Closed
Bug 526424
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Vertical scrollbar disappears with long mail header name.
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Message Reader UI, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 526918
People
(Reporter: himorin, Unassigned)
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
(deleted),
image/png
|
Details |
I think we might already have a bug like this, but i could not find.
View an attachment for details.
* Vertical scrollbar disappears when long mail header name such as 'content-transfer-encoding' are displaied.
* Can view vertical scrollbar when such header name isn't listed.
* enlarging the window (to the max of XGA) doesn't solve this
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
Hello Himorin,
What version of thunderbird are you seeing this on ?
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hello Himorin,
>
> What version of thunderbird are you seeing this on ?
Ah, forgot it. sorry.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; ja; rv:1.9.1.6pre) Gecko/20091103 Shredder/3.0pre
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
Looking at that screenshot, I see an "other actions" dropdown, which makes me suspect it's displaying all the headers it needs to. Am I correctly understanding that you expect to see more headers below content-transfer-encoding and a vertical scrollbar for the message header area? If so, which headers are you expecting to see?
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3)
> Looking at that screenshot, I see an "other actions" dropdown, which makes me
> suspect it's displaying all the headers it needs to. Am I correctly
> understanding that you expect to see more headers below
> content-transfer-encoding and a vertical scrollbar for the message header area?
> If so, which headers are you expecting to see?
No, the problem is that I cannot use 'scrollbar' at the right side.
Hrm. I think I should attach like this rather than the privious one.
Attachment #410166 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
A.A. do you still see this?
I think it should be gone.
perhaps a dup of bug 526918
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #5)
> A.A. do you still see this?
> I think it should be gone.
> perhaps a dup of bug 526918
Ah, no.
Not see this on 3.2a1pre/20100124, 3.2a1pre/20100217, nor 3.0.2pre/20100216.
I think its a dup of bug 526918, as you said.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•