Closed Bug 543401 Opened 15 years ago Closed 15 years ago

nanojit: merge SoftFloatFilter implementations

Categories

(Core Graveyard :: Nanojit, defect)

x86
macOS
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: n.nethercote, Assigned: n.nethercote)

References

Details

(Whiteboard: fixed-in-nanojit, fixed-in-tamarin, fixed-in-tracemonkey)

Attachments

(3 files)

TM and TR have their own versions of SoftFloatFilter, but the differences between them are superficial. A single version should live in NJ. This version could then easily be used by lirasm, which would allow SoftFloat to be tested from lirasm.
Blocks: 530754
Attached patch NJ patch (deleted) — Splinter Review
This patch adds SoftFloatFilter into NJ. The added version is a mixture of what I thought were the best features of the two SoftFloatFilters in TM and TR (but there weren't many differences). I also changed lirasm to run the SoftFloatFilter if arm_vfp is false, which is necessary for it to be tested properly.
Attachment #424683 - Flags: review?(stejohns)
Attachment #424683 - Flags: review?(gal)
Attached patch TM patch (deleted) — Splinter Review
Attachment #424684 - Flags: review?(gal)
Attached patch TR patch (deleted) — Splinter Review
Attachment #424685 - Flags: review?(stejohns)
Attachment #424684 - Flags: review?(gal) → review+
Attachment #424683 - Flags: review?(gal) → review+
Steven, I think I rewrote the code to match what TR does a while back, but watch out for subtle differences when you review this.
Comment on attachment 424683 [details] [diff] [review] NJ patch Disclaimer: I've reviewed the code but not yet actually integrated & tested it on TR running on ARM hardware. That would be nice to do before landing, IMHO. That said, approved with a few quibbles: Weren't we going to add something like NJ_SOFTFLOAT_SUPPORTED so that platforms that can't use softfloat don't compile in the relevant support code? No point in including can't-possibly-be-used code on (say) x86... > static double FASTCALL fneg(double a) { return -a; } AFAIK, FASTCALL only applies to integer arguments, so this is pointless, but harmless, I guess. > if ((op >= LIR_feq && op <= LIR_fge)) Time to add is_fcmp(), methinks, but that's scope creep... > LIR.h: extern const SoftFloatOps softFloatOps; > LIR.cpp: const SoftFloatOps softFloatOps; any reason this shouldn't be static to LIR.cpp?
Attachment #424683 - Flags: review?(stejohns) → review+
Attachment #424685 - Flags: review?(stejohns) → review+
(In reply to comment #5) > Weren't we going to add something like NJ_SOFTFLOAT_SUPPORTED so that platforms > that can't use softfloat don't compile in the relevant support code? No point > in including can't-possibly-be-used code on (say) x86... That's bug 542326. It will conflict a bit with this one, but I can resolve the conflicts when the first one lands. > > static double FASTCALL fneg(double a) { return -a; } > > AFAIK, FASTCALL only applies to integer arguments, so this is pointless, but > harmless, I guess. It's useful for i2f/u2f, and it's easier (due to the SF_CALLINFO macro) if they all use the same calling convention. > > if ((op >= LIR_feq && op <= LIR_fge)) > > Time to add is_fcmp(), methinks, but that's scope creep... That's in bug 542932. > > LIR.h: extern const SoftFloatOps softFloatOps; > > LIR.cpp: const SoftFloatOps softFloatOps; > > any reason this shouldn't be static to LIR.cpp? It's used in TM's jstracer.cpp.
Whiteboard: fixed-in-nanojit → fixed-in-nanojit, fixed-in-tamarin
Whiteboard: fixed-in-nanojit, fixed-in-tamarin → fixed-in-nanojit, fixed-in-tamarin, fixed-in-tracemonkey
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: