Closed
Bug 554988
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
[shared module] Refactor preferencesDialog class to make handling less error prone
Categories
(Mozilla QA Graveyard :: Mozmill Tests, defect)
Mozilla QA Graveyard
Mozmill Tests
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: whimboo, Assigned: whimboo)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [mozmill-doc-complete])
Attachments
(3 files)
|
(deleted),
patch
|
u279076
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
(deleted),
image/png
|
Details | |
|
(deleted),
patch
|
u279076
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Test results
The current code for the preference dialog has been written a long time before and is not quiet the best and reliable one. I will work on refactoring it to make it much less error prone.
|
Assignee | |
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [mozmill-test-failure]
|
|
Assignee | |
Updated•15 years ago
|
Component: Preferences → Mozmill
Product: Firefox → Testing
QA Contact: preferences → mozmill
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
This has been gotten bigger as I thought. But now we hopefully shouldn't fail anymore inside the preferences dialog, especially when switching panes. Further work for sub dialogs should be done later.
Assignee: nobody → hskupin
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #434947 -
Flags: review?(anthony.s.hughes)
|
|
Assignee | |
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [mozmill-doc-needed]
Attachment #434947 -
Flags: review?(anthony.s.hughes) → review+
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
Anthony will run the whole test-run on Linux now and will report back if no regressions have been introduced.
Here is a screenshot detailing the difference in results before and after patching. I did 10 test runs (5 before and 5 after patching).
Henrik, can you please evaluate these results and correlate them to your findings.
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Anthony, you should run the tests with --show-errors to see the details of a failure. Any test which doesn't use the preferences dialog do not have to be obeyed. With the exception details it's easy to find out if it is related to that patch or not. Thanks.
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
I can't see any problems with the patch for the default branch on OS X and Windows. This one is an updated version for 1.9.1.
Attachment #435176 -
Flags: review?(anthony.s.hughes)
Attachment #435176 -
Flags: review?(anthony.s.hughes) → review+
Did a test run with the patch on Linux 1.9.1. I was unable to see any regressions with this patch. r+
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
Landed as:
http://hg.mozilla.org/qa/mozmill-tests/rev/0b113b9c7ae5
http://hg.mozilla.org/qa/mozmill-tests/rev/cd41296cbe61
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
|
|
Assignee | |
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [mozmill-doc-needed] → [mozmill-doc-complete]
|
|
Assignee | |
Updated•15 years ago
|
Summary: [shared-module] Refactor preferencesDialog class to make handling less error prone → [shared module] Refactor preferencesDialog class to make handling less error prone
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 8•14 years ago
|
||
Mass move of Mozmill Test related project bugs to newly created components. You can filter out those emails by using "Mozmill-Tests-to-MozillaQA" as criteria.
Component: Mozmill → Mozmill Tests
Product: Testing → Mozilla QA
QA Contact: mozmill → mozmill-tests
|
||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Product: Mozilla QA → Mozilla QA Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•