Yes, standard Window's bitmap. JPG and other image are ok. Your client doesn't attach bitmap inline so you need to use Outlook Express 5.0. I do have a message that is routed through our server. I need to bring down my server in order to bring the message over. I will let you know when it is done. Wei-Lee jefft@netscape.com (Jeff Tsai) 10/13/00 10:44 AM To: Wei-Lee_Jamrog@iris.com cc: Subject: Re: rendering bitmap Is inline bitmap the Window's bitmap file format? JPG and other image file should be fine, right? Do you have a sample message I can test with? Thanks, -- Jeff Wei-Lee_Jamrog@iris.com wrote: > Ok, I assume this is your client bug then because even message routed > through your server, your client can't render the inline bitmap. > > Yes, my server was down almost every hour yesterday. Because there is a > message cause our MIME conversion code to panic and bring down the server > all together. I finally found the message and my server should be up all > the time now. > > Thanks for looking into the problem... > Wei-Lee > > > > > > jefft@netscape.com (Jeff Tsai) > 10/12/00 01:17 PM > > > To: Wei-Lee_Jamrog@iris.com > cc: > Subject: Re: rendering bitmap > > > Yes, it has to be. By the way, your server seems down most of the time > yesterday. I tried few times to look into the problem you mentioned > regarding partial fetching. > > -- Jeff > > Wei-Lee_Jamrog@iris.com wrote: > > >> Jeff, >> Just FYI, not sure if you already know about this. >> >> Use Outlook Express 5.0 send a message that contains a bitmap. > > (by > >> Insert - Picture...) Both users are on our Netscape server. Use > > Netscape > >> client to see the delivered message but bitmap doesn't shown up. >> >> Can your client render inline bitmap? >> >> Thanks >> Wei-Lee >

Well, that would be nice, but we've never done this. We dont display BMP's inline in 4.x so this would be a feature request. - rhp

This is a dup of bug 18502 ".BMP images not displayed in Mozilla", assigned to pnunn, and futured. Please reopen if you believe it is not a duplicate. And perhaps.. consider reassignment of 18502. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18502 ***

Marking verified as a duplicate.