Closed Bug 57675 Opened 24 years ago Closed 23 years ago

More descriptive error message for non-http:// urls in What's Related

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: Sidebar, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED WORKSFORME
Future

People

(Reporter: bugzilla, Assigned: matt)

References

()

Details

(Keywords: privacy)

If you have the What's Related sidebar active and enter C:\ in the Location field Mozilla tried to show What's Related for the link. Youl then get a: badurl No data available in the sidebar. Expected: Mozilla shouldn't try to show whats related info on file:// urls..
-> me for an initial look..
Assignee: matt → blakeross
This looks similar to bug 53404, which is older, but has no additional comment.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Priority: P3 → P2
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla0.9
Priority: P2 → P3
Target Milestone: mozilla0.9 → mozilla1.0
*** Bug 53404 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
How about making What's Related only see http urls? I get the "badurl" message for finger and https urls, too.
We *don't* do what's related with file:// urls, or with anything that isn't http:// for that matter: if (0 != sUrl.indexOf("http://")) { debug('TranlateContext: non-http argument:('+sUrl+')'); return kNoHTTPReasonUrl; } where kMAMIUrl = 'http://xslt.alexa.com/data?cli=17&dat=nsa'; and kNoHTTPReasonUrl = kMAMIUrl + 'req_type=secure_intranet';. Thus, when you're at a non-http:// url, we shortcircuit and just go to http://xslt.alexa.com/data?cli=17&dat=nsareq_type=secure_intranet, which is the `badurl' message that you see (go there and look). So the choices here are: * don't show anything at all in the What's Related Panel, that is, it would be blank for non-http:// urls. I don't think this is a good idea; it doesn't tell the user why he can't get What's Related urls for the site he's on. * show our own message or webpage in this case. * get Alexa to provide a more descriptive error message depending on the req_type that we pass in (and we could provide more specific req_types than just 'secure intranet', e.g. file_url, ftp_url, etc.). I think the last option is the best. Reassigning to Matt because I have no idea who the Alexa contacts are or how to get them to change this, cc'ing vishy and johng.
Assignee: blakeross → matt
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Priority: P3 → --
Summary: shouldn't do what's related with file:// urls → More descriptive error message for non-http:// urls in What's Related
Target Milestone: mozilla1.0 → ---
*** Bug 55281 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Privacy leak and potential security hole, ccing mstoltz and nominating for nsbeta1. I think the second option is best (we could discuss the specific messages with Alexa, of course).
Keywords: nsbeta1
nav triage team: Not important for beta1, marking nsbeta1-
Keywords: nsbeta1nsbeta1-
spam : changing qa to sujay (New Sidebar QA)
QA Contact: shrir → sujay
*** Bug 70371 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
let's change kNoHTTPReasonUrl to "data:text/html,<html><title>No Alexa</title><body><h1>Alexa only handles HTTP urls</h1><p>You were visiting ... "
It's even unclear to what url the message is referred to. open http://europe.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/mir/ then click on "size comparison" or any of the java panels links. You get a badurl message while you are in front of a regular url. The javascript link is out of sight. In other words I think that "What's related" should refer to the url of the mozilla's window it belongs to and not to the latest clicked link
Marking future since the bug is already marked nsbeta1-.
Target Milestone: --- → Future
Keywords: privacy
*** Bug 75127 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
works for me 20020115
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
verified.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.