Open
Bug 584329
Opened 14 years ago
Updated 2 years ago
a iframe-window set as the focusedWindow still has focus after the iframe is set hidden
Categories
(Core :: XUL, defect)
Tracking
()
NEW
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
blocking2.0 | --- | - |
People
(Reporter: asaf, Unassigned)
References
(Depends on 1 open bug)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
(deleted),
patch
|
smaug
:
feedback+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Found this while investigating bug 574353.
If a the window of a xul iframe is set as the focused window, and no element within it actually received focus, the iframe-window would still be marked as the focused window if the iframe is set hidden.
I cannot tell if this is a regression.
Reporter | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
blocking2.0: --- → ?
Updated•14 years ago
|
blocking2.0: ? → final+
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
A simple test shows that no 'pagehide'/'unload' event fires at the frame's document when it is hidden in this way, so the focus manager isn't getting notified.
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
What does "iframe is set hidden" mean? display: none? visibility: hidden?
In the first case we could detect that the iframe's rendering object is deleted,
but not sure what to with the latter case.
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
The former.
Bugs 570835 and 561940 are also related.
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
Would be great to have a testcase here.
So, if the case is display: none, nsSubDocumentFrame::DestroyFrom could
probably unfocus the window/element in the iframe.
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
Neil continues to think this blocks. Throwing it his way.
Assignee: nobody → enndeakin
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
One of the ime tests fails with this patch I think, so I need to investigate it.
Attachment #498223 -
Flags: feedback?(Olli.Pettay)
Comment 7•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 498223 [details] [diff] [review]
work in progress
>-[scriptable, uuid(5cb91200-53f6-4d35-989d-1d28ad80a0d4)]
>+[scriptable, uuid(F91024AD-F5A8-42CB-851E-57033458F69C)]
Can't take interfaces changes to trunk atm.
There is nsIFocusManager_MOZILLA_2_0_BRANCH , which could be perhaps used,
or do we need nsIFocusManager_MOZILLA_2_0_BRANCH_2 for this?
Perhaps bsmedberg could know that.
>@@ -248,19 +248,20 @@ interface nsIFocusManager : nsISupports
> *
> * If aNeedsFocus is true, then focus events are expected to be fired on the
> * window if this window is in the focused window chain.
> */
> [noscript] void windowShown(in nsIDOMWindow aWindow, in PRBool aNeedsFocus);
>
> /**
> * Called when a document in a window has been hidden or otherwise can no
>- * longer accept focus.
>+ * longer accept focus. If aDestroyed is true, then the window is being
>+ * destroyed and focus should move elsewhere.
> */
>- [noscript] void windowHidden(in nsIDOMWindow aWindow);
>+ [noscript] void windowHidden(in nsIDOMWindow aWindow, in PRBool aDestroyed);
aDestroyed is strange name for the parameter. The window isn't being destroyed, only its
presentation.
Attachment #498223 -
Flags: feedback?(Olli.Pettay) → feedback+
Comment 8•14 years ago
|
||
It seems that the test_imestate.html fails with this patch because setting designMode="on" causes the document frame to be destroyed (and recreated perhaps?)
Any thoughts here as to why or how to work around this?
Comment 9•14 years ago
|
||
Ah, interesting problem. And hard to resolve.
What does 3.6 do? Or 3.5 which doesn't have focusmanager, IIRC.
Btw, why is this a blocker?
Comment 10•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #9)
> Btw, why is this a blocker?
It probably doesn't.
blocking2.0: final+ → ---
Comment 11•14 years ago
|
||
I think the right thing to do here is to let the drivers retriage this...
blocking2.0: --- → ?
Comment 12•14 years ago
|
||
Forecast is mildly annoying with easy workaround (focus something). Blocking-.
Please re-request blocking if you have a scenario which is bad enough that we should hold the release for a fix.
blocking2.0: ? → -
Updated•12 years ago
|
Blocks: gecko-games
Any updates? We should fix this for whatever the latest release is..
No longer blocks: gecko-games
Updated•9 years ago
|
Assignee: enndeakin → nobody
Comment 15•7 years ago
|
||
Moving to Core:XUL per https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1455336
Component: XP Toolkit/Widgets: XUL → XUL
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•