my UserAgent:Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14 i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001103. When I am browsing some Chinese homepage , I find that even I set the font size of Chinese font to font size maller than 16 will appear the same as size of font size 16.. Also,when I set display size to 50% or even smaller ..The font size of chinese font size decrease until it reach font -size 16.. There is no problem for using chinese fonts. And it seem that it occur in linux only,there is no problem when I use mozilla in windows. And i'm sure the X server provide chinese fonts smaller than 16 for that.

over to Erik for triage.

reporter, please include some os info: distribution, gtk ver, glib ver, X[11] server vendor/revision/version, x fontserver vnd/rev/ver, window manager.

gtk version 1.2.7 glib version 1.2.7 using XFree86 3.3.6 Fontserver : using xfs with X-TT 1.3 Patched.. windows manager :windowmaker 0.61.1 and I'm using Debain GNU/Linux 2.2. I think there is not problem with gtk or fontserver.. the chinese font with font size < 16 appear correctly with gtkfontsel or other gtk program.

Pretty sure this is a duplicate of 61108 marking as such. Feel free to change it if you feel otherwise. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 61108 ***

that's not the same as 61108, and I find out what cost the problem: the following lines is intentionally added in $MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME/defaults/pref/unix.js: // minimum font sizes pref("font.min-size.variable.ja", 16); pref("font.min-size.fixed.ja", 16); pref("font.min-size.variable.ko", 16); pref("font.min-size.fixed.ko", 16); pref("font.min-size.variable.zh-CN", 16); pref("font.min-size.fixed.zh-CN", 16); pref("font.min-size.variable.zh-TW", 16); pref("font.min-size.fixed.zh-TW", 16); I wonder why they are added ,and it will be fixed if these lines are removed

It looks to me that this bug is a duplicate of bug 30910. Reporter, if you agree please mark this as a duplicate, and until then the obvious workaround is to change the settings manually.

Marking as duplicate, since exposing the pref and implimenting the feature is already covered in 30910. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30910 ***