WINNT 5.2 mozilla-central debug test xpcshell on 2010/12/02 19:56:27 http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=Firefox/1291348587.1291350916.7841.gz TEST-INFO | e:\builds\moz2_slave\mozilla-central-win32-debug-unittest-xpcshell\build\xpcshell\tests\toolkit\components\downloads\test\unit\test_bug_382825.js | running test ... <a name='err0'></a><font color='000080'>TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | e:\builds\moz2_slave\mozilla-central-win32-debug-unittest-xpcshell\build\xpcshell\tests\toolkit\components\downloads\test\unit\test_bug_382825.js | test failed (with xpcshell return code: -2147483645), see following log: </font>>>>>>>> ### XPCOM_MEM_LEAK_LOG defined -- logging leaks to c:\docume~1\cltbld\locals~1\temp\tmpctneum\runxpcshelltests_leaks.log pldhash: for the table at address 0544E710, the given entrySize of 48 probably favors chaining over double hashing. *** Throwing trying to get ProfLDS *** Throwing trying to get ProfD pldhash: for the table at address 0739059C, the given entrySize of 48 probably favors chaining over double hashing. *** Throwing trying to get UHist TEST-INFO | (xpcshell/head.js) | test 1 pending TEST-INFO | (xpcshell/head.js) | test 2 pending pldhash: for the table at address 076D36E0, the given entrySize of 56 probably favors chaining over double hashing. *** Throwing trying to get cachePDir *** Throwing trying to get ProfLD *** Throwing trying to get cachePDir TEST-INFO | (xpcshell/head.js) | test 2 finished TEST-PASS | e:/builds/moz2_slave/mozilla-central-win32-debug-unittest-xpcshell/build/xpcshell/tests/toolkit/components/downloads/test/unit/test_bug_382825.js | [test_retry_canceled : 54] 3 == 3 TEST-INFO | (xpcshell/head.js) | test 2 pending nsNativeModuleLoader::LoadModule("e:\builds\moz2_slave\mozilla-central-win32-debug-unittest-xpcshell\build\firefox\components\xpcomsample.dll") - load FAILED, rv: 80520012, error: &lt;unknown; can't get error from NSPR> JS Component Loader: ERROR (null):0 uncaught exception: 2147500037 WARNING: NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS(rv, rv) failed with result 0x80040111: file e:/builds/moz2_slave/mozilla-central-win32-debug/build/toolkit/components/downloads/src/nsDownloadManager.cpp, line 1539 TEST-PASS | e:/builds/moz2_slave/mozilla-central-win32-debug-unittest-xpcshell/build/xpcshell/tests/toolkit/components/downloads/test/unit/test_bug_382825.js | [test_retry_bad : 66] 2147746065 == 2147746065 TEST-INFO | (xpcshell/head.js) | test 2 finished TEST-INFO | (xpcshell/head.js) | running event loop TEST-INFO | (xpcshell/head.js) | test 1 finished TEST-INFO | (xpcshell/head.js) | exiting test TEST-INFO | (xpcshell/head.js) | test 1 pending ### ERROR: SymGetModuleInfo64: The specified module could not be found. ###!!! ASSERTION: attempted to open a new window with no WindowCreator: 'mWindowCreator', file e:/builds/moz2_slave/mozilla-central-win32-debug/build/embedding/components/windowwatcher/src/nsWindowWatcher.cpp, line 687

> WARNING: NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS(rv, rv) failed with result 0x80040111: file > e:/builds/moz2_slave/mozilla-central-win32-debug/build/toolkit/components/downloads/src/nsDownloadManager.cpp, > line 1539 https://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/components/downloads/src/nsDownloadManager.cpp#1539 Given what the test (https://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/components/downloads/test/unit/test_bug_382825.js) is doing, I suspect we need to mock whatever would throw up the prompt so it doesn't try to open a window. FWIW, this didn't assert when I wrote the test :)

Mass marking whiteboard:[orange] bugs WFM (to clean up TBPL bug suggestions) that: * Haven't changed in > 6months * Whose whiteboard contains none of the strings: {disabled,marked,random,fuzzy,todo,fails,failing,annotated,leave open,time-bomb} * Passed a (quick) manual inspection of bug summary/whiteboard to ensure they weren't a false positive. I've also gone through and searched for cases where the whiteboard wasn't labelled correctly after test disabling, by using attachment description & basic comment searches. However if the test for which this bug was about has in fact been disabled/annotated/..., please accept my apologies & reopen/mark the whiteboard appropriately so this doesn't get re-closed in the future (and please ping me via IRC or email so I can try to tweak the saved searches to avoid more edge cases). Sorry for the spam! Filter on: #FFA500