Closed
Bug 626262
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
"ASSERTION: ownerDocument changed again after adopting!" with mutation event
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla5
People
(Reporter: jruderman, Assigned: peterv)
References
Details
(Keywords: assertion, testcase, Whiteboard: [sg:high?] [qa-examined-192])
Attachments
(4 files, 1 obsolete file)
(deleted),
text/html
|
Details | |
(deleted),
text/plain
|
Details | |
(deleted),
patch
|
bzbarsky
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
(deleted),
patch
|
dveditz
:
approval1.9.2.18+
dveditz
:
approval1.9.1.20+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
###!!! ASSERTION: ownerDocument changed again after adopting!: 'HasSameOwnerDoc(newContent) && doc == GetOwnerDoc()', file content/base/src/nsGenericElement.cpp, line 4066
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
Closing this. Having a node in one document with a different ownerDocument might lead to cross-origin information leaks?
Blocks: 418755
Group: core-security
Updated•14 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [sg:high?]
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
Needs some more testing.
Assignee: nobody → peterv
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
Attachment #513082 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #517440 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 517440 [details] [diff] [review] v1.1 r=me
Attachment #517440 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•14 years ago
|
||
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/12ea0bd80e2e
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #517440 -
Flags: approval1.9.2.18?
Attachment #517440 -
Flags: approval1.9.1.20?
Updated•14 years ago
|
blocking1.9.2: --- → .18+
status1.9.1:
--- → wanted
status1.9.2:
--- → wanted
status-firefox5:
--- → fixed
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla5
Comment 8•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 517440 [details] [diff] [review] v1.1 Is this patch really going to work on the branches as-is?
Updated•14 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [sg:high?] → [sg:high?][need answer to comment 8 from peterv]
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•14 years ago
|
||
Here's the patch merged to the 1.9.2 branch.
Attachment #533336 -
Flags: approval1.9.2.18?
Attachment #533336 -
Flags: approval1.9.1.20?
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #517440 -
Flags: approval1.9.2.18?
Attachment #517440 -
Flags: approval1.9.1.20?
Comment 11•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 533336 [details] [diff] [review] v1.1 (branch) Approved for 1.9.2.18 and 1.9.1.20, a=dveditz for release-drivers
Attachment #533336 -
Flags: approval1.9.2.18?
Attachment #533336 -
Flags: approval1.9.2.18+
Attachment #533336 -
Flags: approval1.9.1.20?
Attachment #533336 -
Flags: approval1.9.1.20+
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•14 years ago
|
||
http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-1.9.2/rev/b86d93d36a78
Whiteboard: [sg:high?][need answer to comment 8 from peterv] → [sg:high?]
Updated•13 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [sg:high?] → [sg:high?] [qa-examined-192]
Updated•13 years ago
|
Group: core-security
Updated•6 years ago
|
Component: DOM → DOM: Core & HTML
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•