Open
Bug 655858
Opened 14 years ago
Updated 2 years ago
"ASSERTION: Want to fire DOMNodeRemoved event, but it's not safe" with XML error in innerHTML setter
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
NEW
People
(Reporter: jruderman, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: assertion, regression, testcase)
Attachments
(2 files)
###!!! ASSERTION: Want to fire DOMNodeRemoved event, but it's not safe: 'aChild->IsNodeOfType(nsINode::eCONTENT) && static_cast<nsIContent*>(aChild)-> IsInNativeAnonymousSubtree() || IsSafeToRunScript() || sDOMNodeRemovedSuppressCount', file content/base/src/nsContentUtils.cpp, line 3751
This is a recent regression, most likely from bug 650493.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
We should move this code over to using RemoveChildAt and simply not fire mutation events. Parser doesn't in other cases anyway.
Updated•13 years ago
|
OS: Mac OS X → All
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
My fuzzer hits this assertion a lot, which slows it down somewhat.
Updated•7 years ago
|
Updated•6 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P3
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Component: DOM → DOM: Core & HTML
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•