Closed Bug 661587 Opened 13 years ago Closed 13 years ago

Don't use the root logger

Categories

(Firefox :: Sync, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

VERIFIED FIXED
mozilla7

People

(Reporter: philikon, Assigned: philikon)

References

Details

(Whiteboard: [verified in services])

Attachments

(2 files)

We'd like to uplift log4moz to toolkit at some point (bug 451283). One prerequisite is to get Sync to stop taking control of the root logger.
Attached patch v1 (deleted) — Splinter Review
Assignee: nobody → philipp
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #538295 - Flags: review?(rnewman)
Comment on attachment 538295 [details] [diff] [review] v1 Review of attachment 538295 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- What's this, 23 files? :D Pleasantly formulaic!
Attachment #538295 - Flags: review?(rnewman) → review+
Actually, the more I think about it, the more I wonder whether we should perhaps just get rid of the default LoggerRepository (Log4Moz.repository) and make every component that wants to use log4moz create its own logger hierarchy in its own repository. Then we don't need the redundant "Sync." prefix everywhere.
(In reply to comment #3) > Actually, the more I think about it, the more I wonder whether we should > perhaps just get rid of the default LoggerRepository (Log4Moz.repository) > and make every component that wants to use log4moz create its own logger > hierarchy in its own repository. Then we don't need the redundant "Sync." > prefix everywhere. Would this make it impossible to simply turn on all logging? If so I would be against that.
(In reply to comment #4) > Would this make it impossible to simply turn on all logging? If so I would > be against that. What does "all logging" mean? What does "turn on" mean? Having each component use its own repository would mean there's no single root logger which means you can't just attach a, say, DumpAppender to the one and only root logger to get all logging output from all components. Is that what you want? It doesn't sound very useful to me...
Being able to turn on logging for everything is often pretty useful if you have no idea what is causing some disk thrashing at a particular time etc. As more things start to use log4moz I'd expect to see something like the error console start to just log things and having custom repositories for everything seems more complex than just having everything use a sensible namespace
(In reply to comment #6) > Being able to turn on logging for everything is often pretty useful if you > have no idea what is causing some disk thrashing at a particular time etc. > As more things start to use log4moz I'd expect to see something like the > error console start to just log things and having custom repositories for > everything seems more complex than just having everything use a sensible > namespace Fair enough. I wonder if we should disallow separate repositories then.
(In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Being able to turn on logging for everything is often pretty useful if you > > have no idea what is causing some disk thrashing at a particular time etc. > > As more things start to use log4moz I'd expect to see something like the > > error console start to just log things and having custom repositories for > > everything seems more complex than just having everything use a sensible > > namespace > > Fair enough. I wonder if we should disallow separate repositories then. The repository never seemed like a worthwhile abstraction to me, I commented as such in bug 451283 comment 16
(In reply to comment #9) > The repository never seemed like a worthwhile abstraction to me, I commented > as such in bug 451283 comment 16 Yup. I was just curious since you were critiquing dissimilarities with Log4J similarities (Formatter v. Layout), and Log4J *does* have repositories.
(In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > The repository never seemed like a worthwhile abstraction to me, I commented > > as such in bug 451283 comment 16 > > Yup. I was just curious since you were critiquing dissimilarities with Log4J > similarities (Formatter v. Layout), and Log4J *does* have repositories. I think that must have been a newer addition since I last used log4J and seems to be an optional feature (in that you can use log4J quite happily by ignoring it).
STRs for QA: The Sync log (or logs, since bug 610832) should all look like this: 1307991868256 Sync.Service INFO Loading Weave 1.10.0 1307991868309 Sync.Engine.Bookmarks DEBUG Engine initialized 1307991868313 Sync.Engine.Forms DEBUG Engine initialized 1307991868316 Sync.Engine.History DEBUG Engine initialized 1307991868320 Sync.Engine.Passwords DEBUG Engine initialized 1307991868323 Sync.Engine.Prefs DEBUG Engine initialized 1307991868326 Sync.Engine.Tabs DEBUG Engine initialized ... Notice the "Sync." prefix before each component.
verified with latest s-c builds
Whiteboard: [fixed in services] → [fixed in services][verified in services]
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [fixed in services][verified in services] → [verified in services]
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla7
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Component: Firefox Sync: Backend → Sync
Product: Cloud Services → Firefox
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: