Closed
Bug 677784
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
Dipper types are probably unnecessary
Categories
(Core :: XPCOM, defect)
Core
XPCOM
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: khuey, Assigned: nika)
References
Details
I think we can treat dipper types as regular outparams.
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
I may be confused, but isn't the point of dipper types that they get passed as references, so "const Foo&" in and "Foo&" out?
Comment 3•7 years ago
|
||
Dipper types are gone now. Hooray!
Assignee: nobody → nika
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•