Closed Bug 683635 Opened 13 years ago Closed 13 years ago

Implement latest OWA mockup

Categories

(Web Apps :: Extension, defect, P3)

defect

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 697006

People

(Reporter: TimAbraldes, Unassigned)

References

()

Details

Assignee: nobody → tabraldes
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Looking for a front-end person to take care of UI
Assignee: tabraldes → nobody
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Component: OpenWebApps → Extension
Product: Mozilla Labs → Web Apps
QA Contact: openWebApps → extension
That mockup is gone, is there a new url for it?
I've filed bug 700485 to get the files at faaborg's people site restored
ok, mockups are back up
I'm going to take a look over these mockups and sign off on them. I'm pretty sure these are good to go but I'd like to take one last look and clarify some things.
Assignee: nobody → clarkbw
Priority: -- → P3
assigning a lower priority as not a blocker for release
Looked over the mockups and these all still look good for the direction we're heading. Not sure who should be assigned to this now...
Assignee: clarkbw → nobody
A Pivotal Tracker story has been created for this Bug: http://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/24808673
Has this mockup been superseded? I don't see any mention of this mockup at https://wiki.mozilla.org/Web_Apps_integration, or in bug 731541, or in bug 697006. I'm not sure if this bug should be tracked for the m-c implementation or resolved. Can UX weigh in here? Also CCing felipe and fabrice, who are more familiar with the front end of the m-c implementation.
Oops, just finished reading through bug 697006 and it looks like this mockup was indeed used.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.