Closed Bug 684574 Opened 13 years ago Closed 13 years ago

Categories

(Core :: Layout, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla9

People

(Reporter: ptomes, Assigned: MatsPalmgren_bugz)

References

()

Details

(Keywords: regression)

Attachments

(2 files)

Attached image bug.png (deleted) —
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:9.0a1) Gecko/20110903 Firefox/9.0a1 Build ID: 20110903030832 Steps to reproduce: 1. Go to the http://www.wetterzentrale.de/topkarten/fswrfmeur.html 2. Wait 2 seconds till the bar "Nightly prevented this site from opening a pop-up windows" appear. 3. Drag the mouse cursor over the links on the top of the page such as "Hohe Wolken" etc. Actual results: 4. The top of the page is then rendered badly. Expected results: The top of the page should be aligned properly as in Aurora of Firefox 8, Beta of Firefox 7 or Firefox 6.
Works for me: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.21) Gecko/20110830 Firefox/3.6.21 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/6.0.1 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0a2) Gecko/20110903 Firefox/8.0a2 Reproduced: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0a1) Gecko/20110904 Firefox/9.0a1 Last good nightly: 2011-09-03 First bad nightly: 2011-09-04 Pushlog: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?startdate=2011-09-03&enddate=2011-09-04
Keywords: regression
OS: Windows 7 → All
Version: 9 Branch → Trunk
Hardware: x86 → All
Please ignore regression range in last part of comment 1. The correct one seems to be: Last good nightly: 2011-08-24 First bad nightly: 2011-08-25 Pushlog: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=198c7de0699d&tochange=e58e98a89827
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: General → Layout
Ever confirmed: true
Product: Firefox → Core
QA Contact: general → layout
Looks like fallout from bug 653649 Kill nsIFrame::GetAdditionalChildListName
Blocks: 653649
Local track down using Linux x86_64: Due to skipped revisions, the first bad revision could be any of: changeset: 75840:5c0d46747250 user: Mats Palmgren <matspal@gmail.com> date: Wed Aug 24 22:54:29 2011 +0200 summary: Bug 653649 - New way of getting child lists from frames. (part 1/5) r=roc sr=dbaron changeset: 75841:bbb68899df56 user: Mats Palmgren <matspal@gmail.com> date: Wed Aug 24 22:54:29 2011 +0200 summary: Bug 653649 - New way of getting child lists from frames. (part 2/5) r=roc sr=dbaron changeset: 75842:de17763f5ba7 user: Mats Palmgren <matspal@gmail.com> date: Wed Aug 24 22:54:29 2011 +0200 summary: Bug 653649 - New way of getting child lists from frames. (part 3/5) r=roc changeset: 75843:d9797d99f5f7 user: Mats Palmgren <matspal@gmail.com> date: Wed Aug 24 22:54:30 2011 +0200 summary: Bug 653649 - New way of getting child lists from frames. (part 4/5) r=roc
Thomas, thanks for tracking down the precise regression window.
The error is in InternalInvalidateThebesLayersInSubtree: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/layout/base/FrameLayerBuilder.cpp#1906 The original code was: PRInt32 listIndex = 0; nsIAtom* childList = nsnull; do { nsIFrame* child = aFrame->GetFirstChild(childList); if (!child && !childList) { nsSubDocumentFrame* subdocumentFrame = do_QueryFrame(aFrame); if (subdocumentFrame) { // Descend into the subdocument child = subdocumentFrame->GetSubdocumentRootFrame(); } } while (child) { if (InternalInvalidateThebesLayersInSubtree(child)) { foundContainerLayer = PR_TRUE; } child = child->GetNextSibling(); } childList = aFrame->GetAdditionalChildListName(listIndex++); } while (childList); In the SubDocumentFrame case, note that it recurses on its root frame, whereas the new code iterates the root frame's children and recurse on those. Patch coming up...
Attached patch fix (deleted) — Splinter Review
Synthesize a child list from the subdocument root frame and add it to the array of child lists to iterate. I'll try to find a way to test this without relying on the popup blocker, let me know if you have any tips on how to do that.
Attachment #558287 - Flags: review?(roc)
Comment on attachment 558287 [details] [diff] [review] fix Review of attachment 558287 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you!
Attachment #558287 - Flags: review?(roc) → review+
Flags: in-testsuite?
Whiteboard: [inbound]
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla9
Blocks: 685113
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [inbound]
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: