Open Bug 708384 Opened 13 years ago Updated 2 years ago

Add obvious way to make event-handler-like functions in shell tests

Categories

(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)

Other Branch
defect

Tracking

()

People

(Reporter: jorendorff, Unassigned)

Details

In the browser, event handlers go through nsJSContext::CompileEventHandler and nsJSContext::BindCompiledEventHandler. The result is a function unlike anything we can create in the shell. So we have no shell tests for event-handler-like functions. There are three things going on here. 1. XPConnect makes it possible to build objects that have other objects on the scope chain (DOM Elements are like this whether they have event handlers or not). 2. The event handler code is compiled without the compile-and-go option. 3. The resulting function is then cloned onto a DOM object, which becomes the scope chain for the clone. We can do (3) using the shell's clone() function. If (1) and (2) were possible, I think we'd be all set.
Assignee: general → nobody
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.