Closed Bug 712278 Opened 13 years ago Closed 13 years ago

IonMonkey: rework fixed registers

Categories

(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: jandem, Assigned: jandem)

References

Details

Attachments

(3 files, 2 obsolete files)

Our current requirement system seems to be too complicated. One of the problems is that we can't spill all intervals at calls, because the spill intervals overlap with the intervals for the output regs. Last week I also had to workaround some issues with must-reuse-input for bug 709731. We should do what the paper describes and give every physical register its own interval, and use register hints to avoid unnecessary moves.
Decided not to do this after all. This approach has its own problems and we don't really need this anymore.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
We do need this after all, to fix bug 715460 properly. Oh well.
Blocks: 715460
No longer blocks: 709731
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: WONTFIX → ---
We decided to fix this after all. One use case is the following: 1: v1 = ...; 2: divi (temp: edx) 3: use(v1) Currently we'll happily use edx for the result of the first operation, even though it's evicted immediately for the divi temp. My WIP patch passes jit-tests, fixes spectral-norm with --ion and fixes a few other jit-tests with --ion-eager (-n). The only problem is that the patch regresses md5 a bit, since there are more ranges now. There are fewer *intervals*, due to removing bogus intervals. This is a good thing because ranges require less memory than intervals. Regressing md5 is unacceptable though, after sstangl's optimization work. Fortunately, this doesn't seem too hard to fix - since intervals are processed in ascending order, we can do some caching to prevent looping over ranges that are definitely out of range.
Status: REOPENED → ASSIGNED
Attached patch Part 1: Optimize intersect/covers (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
This patch is necessary to not regress SS md5 (regalloc time for the largest function is 1.7-1.8 ms with or without the patches I'm going to attach). md5 is a kind of worst-case benchmark, since the fixed intervals have many small ranges, caused by the large number of calls. Intervals are handled in ascending order, so this patch caches the last processed range and tries to start from there the next time covers/intersect is called.
Attachment #588834 - Flags: review?(dvander)
Oops, forgot to qref.
Attachment #588834 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #588834 - Flags: review?(dvander)
Attachment #588835 - Flags: review?(dvander)
Attached patch Part 2: Add fixed intervals (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Some other follow-up patches later today.
Attachment #588904 - Flags: review?(dvander)
Attached patch Part 2: Add fixed intervals (deleted) — Splinter Review
Attachment #588904 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #588904 - Flags: review?(dvander)
Attachment #588921 - Flags: review?(dvander)
Attached patch Part 3: Follow-up fixes (deleted) — Splinter Review
Various fixes necessary to pass jit-tests , most notably: - Rename the "before" movegroup to "input" movegroup, and add a new "before" movegroup. - If an instruction uses defineFixed, and the next instruction uses this value with a fixed policy, we'd have to deal with a lot of complexity like fixedReg -> fixedReg moves etc. Fixed output regs are not very common so the patch just adds an LNop instruction after such instructions, so that regalloc does not have to worry about this case.
Attachment #588923 - Flags: review?(dvander)
dvander, we should talk about safepoints, too. I think they will need some changes, but not entirely sure which cases we need to handle etc.
Attachment #588835 - Flags: review?(dvander) → review+
Comment on attachment 588921 [details] [diff] [review] Part 2: Add fixed intervals Review of attachment 588921 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Nice work. ::: js/src/ion/LinearScan.cpp @@ +549,5 @@ > + CodePosition from; > + if (def->policy() == LDefinition::PRESET && def->output()->isRegister()) { > + AnyRegister reg = def->output()->toRegister(); > + addFixedRange(reg, inputOf(*ins), outputOf(*ins).next()); > + from = outputOf(*ins).next(); Why does the output get a range covering the next instruction? ::: js/src/ion/Lowering.cpp @@ +168,2 @@ > argslot, > tempFixed(ArgumentsRectifierReg), Should have a JS_STATIC_ASSERT that ArgumentsRectifierReg != CallTempReg*? ::: js/src/ion/x64/Assembler-x64.h @@ +85,5 @@ > static const Register ScratchReg = r11; > static const FloatRegister ScratchFloatReg = { JSC::X86Registers::xmm15 }; > > static const Register ArgumentsRectifierReg = { JSC::X86Registers::r8 }; > +static const Register CallTempReg1 = { rbp }; If you can get away with not using rbp/ebp, I'd avoid it, just because it trips up gdb when stepping through. ::: js/src/ion/x86/Assembler-x86.h @@ +69,5 @@ > static const FloatRegister ScratchFloatReg = { JSC::X86Registers::xmm7 }; > > static const Register ArgumentsRectifierReg = { JSC::X86Registers::esi }; > +static const Register CallTempReg1 = { JSC::X86Registers::ebp }; > +static const Register CallTempReg2 = { JSC::X86Registers::eax }; Don't forget ARM.
Attachment #588921 - Flags: review?(dvander) → review+
Comment on attachment 588923 [details] [diff] [review] Part 3: Follow-up fixes Review of attachment 588923 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: js/src/ion/shared/Lowering-shared-inl.h @@ +101,5 @@ > LDefinition def(type, LDefinition::PRESET); > def.setOutput(output); > > + // Add an LNop to avoid regalloc problems if the next op uses this value > + // with a fixed or at-start policy. What exactly is the problem with this situation?
Attachment #588923 - Flags: review?(dvander) → review+
http://hg.mozilla.org/projects/ionmonkey/rev/d326b4261278 http://hg.mozilla.org/projects/ionmonkey/rev/dc878a1566f0 http://hg.mozilla.org/projects/ionmonkey/rev/da22e1665505 Just noticed that these patches fix the v8-v5/check-splay.js crash. (In reply to David Anderson [:dvander] from comment #10) > Comment on attachment 588921 [details] [diff] [review] > > Why does the output get a range covering the next instruction? We discussed this on IRC and I added a comment. > > ::: js/src/ion/Lowering.cpp > @@ +168,2 @@ > > argslot, > > tempFixed(ArgumentsRectifierReg), > > Should have a JS_STATIC_ASSERT that ArgumentsRectifierReg != CallTempReg*? Added these asserts. GCC 4.2 did not like the JS_STATIC_ASSERT with registers (no problems with Clang), so I used a normal JS_ASSERT. > > If you can get away with not using rbp/ebp, I'd avoid it, just because it > trips up gdb when stepping through. Changed them to rdi/edi.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: