Closed
Bug 73003
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
[RFE] Register smb:// protocol for windows shares redirecting to file: URL
Categories
(Core :: Networking: File, enhancement)
Core
Networking: File
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: netdragon, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: helpwanted)
If you do a search using this link, you will notice it will bring up network
locations. Of course these locations won't work for you (even with ie), because
you aren't on the network. If you were on the network, it would only work in
ie. I think that if you click on these links with mozilla, network neighborhood
should be brought up with that location (or any other oses network browser). At
least until mozilla can browse the network itself (if that is possible).
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
Can you explain your problem in more detail please. I get the following message
when I goto the URL:
Sorry, but http://rpi.phynd.net is for the private use of the RPI community only.
Are you meaning paths that would be represented by windows as
\\hostname\path\to\file and therefore should be accessed by browsers using the
file:// protocol?
This I think is definitely Windows specific (although don't know how Macs
approach it), but using file: you can access NFS mounts under Linux as they're
mounted in the filesystem.
Anyway you should be able to access any network drives accessible from the
file:// protocol in Windows if not then that's a bug, you shouldn't have to open
an external file manager app to do this.
See bug 60321, bug 70871
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
yes, shared directory folders that i guess are represented by file:// because
thats what the links are on the site. Example: file://da%20pimp/music/dmx%20f.%
20sisqo%20-%20what%20these%20bitches%20want.mp3.
It would be \\da pimp in windows.
In Mozilla and Netscape 6 it just does nothing but changes the url to file://da%
20pimp///
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
That's bug 60231 for the behaviour you describe here, as for the launching
explorer part of the bug that'll be handled by bug 68406 to allow URL schemes to
be associated with different applications. e.g. file:/// with explorer.exe
As this bug is about bringing up explorer I'm going to mark it as a dup of 68406.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 68406 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Summary: Trying to load a network location should bring up explorer (or any other oses equivalent)
Updated•24 years ago
|
Summary: Trying to load a network location should bring up explorer (or any other oses equivalent)
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
Is there currently a bug about actually having network browsing working within
Mozilla? That would be preferred if it was ever added to actually loading
Explorer's Network Browser.
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•24 years ago
|
||
I don't think this is a dup. If you look at that bug, the URI schemes were made
to be blocked by that bug, not marked dupe. As this is a URI scheme, it should
also depend on that bug (but not a dup as it is not the same bug). I have yet
to figure out what bug 60231 has to do with anything.
Marking this bug dupe would probably cause it to be marked fixed along with
that other bug when it isn't finished.
Status: VERIFIED → UNCONFIRMED
Depends on: protozilla
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
Summary: Trying to load a network location should bring up explorer (or any other oses equivalent) → [RFE] Register file:// network browsing URI scheme until mozilla can browse itself
Comment 7•24 years ago
|
||
60231 was a typo, I meant bug 60321 - mozilla can navigate network drives under
windows exactly the same as local drives. This bug covers some of the problems
that you're having. Sorting out this would solve your problem.
OK, it does look like individual protocol schemes have got their own bugs filed
against them but personally I think that is pointless as we could just fill up
bugzilla with requests to support launching a helper app for each individual
protocol scheme. The way I see it is that if bug 68406 is fixed support for all
these schemes and any that you make up will come automatically. So to be honest
I'd actually mark support for launching external apps by mailto:, telnet:, etc
as either dupes of bug 68406 or invalid because of it. But as the bugs have
currently been marked as a dependency I'm happy to keep it that way.
Comment 8•24 years ago
|
||
Definate dupe.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 60321 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago → 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•24 years ago
|
||
I will trust Ksosez's judgement on this one, although bug 60321 doesn't make
any sense to me ;-)
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Comment 10•22 years ago
|
||
[RFE] is deprecated in favor of severity: enhancement. They have the same meaning.
Severity: normal → enhancement
Comment 11•22 years ago
|
||
REOPEN:
implementing file URLs w/ a protocol handler solved this.
Status: VERIFIED → UNCONFIRMED
QA Contact: tever → benc
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
Comment 12•22 years ago
|
||
RESOLVED/FIXED:
(no bug on implementation).
http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvslog.cgi?file=mozilla/netwerk/protocol/file/src/nsFileProtocolHandler.cpp&rev=1.1&root=/cvsroot
Mac OS X could also use the finder, per bug 203943.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago → 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•21 years ago
|
||
2003082704 (1.5b)
Still doesn't seem to work.
I tried:
file://netdragon1/
\\netdragon1
file:////netdragon1/
file:///netdragon1/
file://\\netdragon1
None of these logical choices worked properly.
Comment 15•21 years ago
|
||
What OS are you using?
Windows would be:
file:///c:/
Reporter | ||
Comment 16•21 years ago
|
||
In Internet Explorer, it would be:
\\netdragon1 (computer on my lan)
file:///\\netdragon1 didn't work
This was about networking browsing. Like samba shares, etc. It should open up
the Explorer window for that computer.
Windows XP SP1
Comment 17•20 years ago
|
||
Brian, that is really bug 62851, which I have reopened and updated.
Can you verify this bug, which was to add the basic file: URL functionality?
Reporter | ||
Comment 18•20 years ago
|
||
This is about being able to browse samba shares (by bringing up a smb client
like nautilus or explorer), and it's not simply windows-specific.
file:///\\netserv and file://\\netserv works in IE, and smb://netserv, and
smb:///netserv works for nautilus. We need a compatible way to browse network
shares.
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Summary: [RFE] Register file:// network browsing URI scheme until mozilla can browse itself → [RFE] Register smb:// protocol, along with handling file:///\\sambasrv
Reporter | ||
Comment 19•20 years ago
|
||
Dupe of bug 62851, but I don't like that bug's summary.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 62851 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago → 20 years ago
No longer depends on: protozilla
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 20•20 years ago
|
||
Brian, I think you've really asked for two things here, the smb aspect should be
in another bug.
Making file: URLs work more flexibily is easier to fix than adding a new
protocol handler, espeically one that is not a clear specification for smb: URLs
(that I can find), unlike, say nfs:, for example.
Reporter | ||
Comment 21•20 years ago
|
||
Ok, so then we should probably make smb:// URLs then just redirect to a file://
URL and have this bug depend on that one (or a helper application for smb://).
That way we could fix the easy one first.
Reporter | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Assignee: neeti → darin
Reporter | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Updated•20 years ago
|
Keywords: helpwanted
Target Milestone: --- → Future
Comment 22•19 years ago
|
||
-> default owner
Assignee: darin → nobody
QA Contact: benc → networking.file
Target Milestone: Future → ---
Updated•9 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago → 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•