Closed Bug 747857 Opened 13 years ago Closed 12 years ago

Text input suddenly grows in size after typing certain amount of characters

Categories

(Core :: Layout, defect)

ARM
Android
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla15
Tracking Status
firefox14 + fixed
blocking-fennec1.0 --- +

People

(Reporter: martijn.martijn, Assigned: dbaron)

References

(Depends on 1 open bug, )

Details

(Keywords: regression, testcase, Whiteboard: readability)

Attachments

(2 files, 1 obsolete file)

Attached file testcase (deleted) —
Steps to reproduce: - Visit testcase - Type a letter (for example 'q') a couple of times Expected result: - The text input stays at the same size Actual result: - The text input suddenly grows in size after typing 8 times the letter 'q'. Reproduce this on the Samsung Galaxy Nexus and the Samsung Galaxy SII See also video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgrpchjAtWQ This regressed between 2012-04-17 and 2012-04-18, regression from bug 706193, I think.
I'm also seeing the link suddenly grow when tapping somewhere on this page: http://people.mozilla.org/~mwargers/tests/tapping/681640_tapevents.html
Blocks: font-inflation
No longer blocks: 706193
Whiteboard: readability
blocking-fennec1.0: ? → +
Assignee: nobody → dbaron
Blocks: 706193
I wrote a patch for this on the airplane a few days ago, but then forgot to test that the tests pass and post it. Hopefully I'll get back to that soon. https://hg.mozilla.org/users/dbaron_mozilla.com/patches/raw-file/d87bc5f40a15/line-threshold-form-controls
Attached patch patch (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Attachment #620436 - Flags: review?(roc)
Comment on attachment 620436 [details] [diff] [review] patch Review of attachment 620436 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: layout/generic/nsFontInflationData.cpp @@ +316,5 @@ > + nsIFrame *optionChild = option->GetFirstPrincipalChild(); > + if (optionChild && optionChild->GetType() == nsGkAtoms::textFrame) { > + optionResult = nsTextFrameUtils:: > + ComputeApproximateLengthWithWhitespaceCompression( > + optionChild->GetContent(), optionChild->GetStyleText()); Don't we need to iterate through the child frames of <option> in case there are multiple text nodes separated by comments? @@ +380,5 @@ > + // need to exclude the display frame. > + nscoord fontSize = kid->GetStyleFont()->mFont.size; > + PRInt32 charCount = CharCountOfLargestOption( > + static_cast<nsComboboxControlFrame*>(kid)->GetDropDown()); > + mTextAmount += charCount * fontSize; Is this really the right thing to do for non-auto-width replaced elements?
(In reply to Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) from comment #4) > ::: layout/generic/nsFontInflationData.cpp > @@ +316,5 @@ > > + nsIFrame *optionChild = option->GetFirstPrincipalChild(); > > + if (optionChild && optionChild->GetType() == nsGkAtoms::textFrame) { > > + optionResult = nsTextFrameUtils:: > > + ComputeApproximateLengthWithWhitespaceCompression( > > + optionChild->GetContent(), optionChild->GetStyleText()); > > Don't we need to iterate through the child frames of <option> in case there > are multiple text nodes separated by comments? I suppose so. > @@ +380,5 @@ > > + // need to exclude the display frame. > > + nscoord fontSize = kid->GetStyleFont()->mFont.size; > > + PRInt32 charCount = CharCountOfLargestOption( > > + static_cast<nsComboboxControlFrame*>(kid)->GetDropDown()); > > + mTextAmount += charCount * fontSize; > > Is this really the right thing to do for non-auto-width replaced elements? I may at some future point want to try to consider widths on inline blocks and replaced elements, but for now I'm just trying to *not* consider form control inputs.
Attached patch patch (deleted) — Splinter Review
revised to iterate the children of <option>
Attachment #620436 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #620436 - Flags: review?(roc)
Attachment #620759 - Flags: review?(roc)
Depends on: 751808
Sorry, backed this out for test failures in 40-50% of the compilable pushes since this landed (which is too high for me to be happy merging inbound into mozilla-central): https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/308f1163a388 See bug 751808 for logs :-)
Target Milestone: mozilla15 → ---
Depends on: 752168
Just to help explain the crashes in bug 752168 - this had ended up being merged to mozilla-central for 3-4 hours before the backout was also merged (we had a 250+ changeset backlog on mozilla-inbound due to CPG, so it slipped through with the efforts to lower that as soon as possible), so ended up being included in the Nightly respin, which is how crashes were occurring in the wild. Today's Nightly will include the backout.
(In reply to Ed Morley [:edmorley] from comment #10) > Just to help explain the crashes in bug 752168 - this had ended up being > merged to mozilla-central for 3-4 hours before the backout was also merged > (we had a 250+ changeset backlog on mozilla-inbound due to CPG, so it > slipped through with the efforts to lower that as soon as possible), so > ended up being included in the Nightly respin, which is how crashes were > occurring in the wild. Today's Nightly will include the backout. I don't think those crashes are at all related to this bug.
Ah sorry, I was just going by Scoobidiver's added dependency :-)
No longer depends on: 752168
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite+
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla15
That was via a mozilla-inbound push that I forgot to note here: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/79f21117ea59
Comment on attachment 620759 [details] [diff] [review] patch [Approval Request Comment] Regression caused by (bug #): bug 706193 User impact if declined: font inflation changes when typing in or selecting values in form controls Testing completed (on m-c, etc.): on mozilla-central for a bit Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): given the mozilla-central testing, reltaively low String changes made by this patch: none
Attachment #620759 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Attachment #620759 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora? → approval-mozilla-aurora+
The test case in comment 1 is fixed the test case in the URL field still grows in size. Tested in Nightly, Aurora and 14 Beta 2.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Depends on: 757616
In triage I was asked to mark this bug fixed and open a new bug 757616.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Depends on: 772440
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: