Closed
Bug 771394
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Update libpng to version 1.5.11
Categories
(Core :: Graphics: ImageLib, defect)
Core
Graphics: ImageLib
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla16
People
(Reporter: RyanVM, Assigned: RyanVM)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
(deleted),
patch
|
justin.lebar+bug
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
libpng 1.5.11 doesn't really add much over libpng 1.5.10. However, in order to get 1.5.10 to build, we had to take a fix that didn't actually make it in until 1.5.11. To make life simpler, I would like to update us the rest of the 1.5.11 so that we're in sync with upstream again.
Already tested OK on Try. (Yes, I'll fix the commit message before landing)
Attachment #639533 -
Flags: review?(justin.lebar+bug)
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
The part of the patch near the end of png.h looks a little strange:
+#ifdef PNG_APNG_SUPPORTED
-+PNG_EXPORT(234, png_uint_32, png_get_acTL, (png_structp png_ptr,
++PNG_EXPORT(235, png_uint_32, png_get_acTL, (png_structp png_ptr,
+ png_infop info_ptr, png_uint_32 *num_frames, png_uint_32 *num_plays));
etc.
as though we're splicing in a patch of a previous patch. Shouldn't the
"-+" and "++" simply be "-" and "+"?
The "diff" view indicates that a lot of line are removed that
shouldn't be.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Are you sure you aren't looking at the apng.patch part of the diff?
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Ryan, maybe we could include one little fix from bug #759067 too?
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
That should stay in its own bug. However, apng.patch should probably be updated when it lands. Were you going to request review at some point?
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 639533 [details] [diff] [review]
Upgrade libpng to version 1.5.11
r=me, I guess. Don't forget to update MOZCHANGES as well as the commit message.
Attachment #639533 -
Flags: review?(justin.lebar+bug) → review+
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ryan VanderMeulen from comment #2)
> Are you sure you aren't looking at the apng.patch part of the diff?
Oops, I was.
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
Flags: in-testsuite+
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → ryanvm
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla16
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•