Closed
Bug 774408
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
about:apps with AITC enabled shows missing stylesheets, incorrect appcache prompt for myapps dashboard
Categories
(Web Apps Graveyard :: AppsInTheCloud, defect)
Web Apps Graveyard
AppsInTheCloud
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: jsmith, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [blocking-aitc-])
Attachments
(1 file)
(deleted),
image/png
|
Details |
Steps:
1. Go to about:apps on Nightly
Expected:
about:apps should redirect to the myapps dashboard, including in the location bar.
Actual:
See screenshot. Missing stylesheets, appcache prompt is incorrect, and URL in the location bar isn't right.
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [blocking-aitc+]
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [blocking-aitc+] → [blocking-aitc-]
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Bringing the IRC discussion in here - not a blocker, as about:apps is likely not an entry point for users. The issue from what I understood in the IRC discussion was server-side, not client-side. I'll hold the discussion on whether to keep the code active or not until a discussion on Friday occurs about apps presentation in Firefox to determine a different question:
"If we don't intend to fix this bug by first release of AITC, should we file and fix a bug to backout or pref off the code for about:apps?"
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jason Smith [:jsmith] from comment #1)
> Bringing the IRC discussion in here - not a blocker, as about:apps is likely
> not an entry point for users. The issue from what I understood in the IRC
> discussion was server-side, not client-side. I'll hold the discussion on
> whether to keep the code active or not until a discussion on Friday occurs
> about apps presentation in Firefox to determine a different question:
>
> "If we don't intend to fix this bug by first release of AITC, should we file
> and fix a bug to backout or pref off the code for about:apps?"
Jason, we are working on defining a simple App Management experience as the first AITC user interface, see the product page at https://wiki.mozilla.org/Features/Apps/AppsManagement
Rather than spending a lot of time on the old about:apps, IMHO we should figure out how the App Management experience best this makes sense on Android.
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Bill Walker [:bwalker] [@wfwalker] from comment #2)
> (In reply to Jason Smith [:jsmith] from comment #1)
> > Bringing the IRC discussion in here - not a blocker, as about:apps is likely
> > not an entry point for users. The issue from what I understood in the IRC
> > discussion was server-side, not client-side. I'll hold the discussion on
> > whether to keep the code active or not until a discussion on Friday occurs
> > about apps presentation in Firefox to determine a different question:
> >
> > "If we don't intend to fix this bug by first release of AITC, should we file
> > and fix a bug to backout or pref off the code for about:apps?"
>
> Jason, we are working on defining a simple App Management experience as the
> first AITC user interface, see the product page at
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Features/Apps/AppsManagement
>
> Rather than spending a lot of time on the old about:apps, IMHO we should
> figure out how the App Management experience best this makes sense on
> Android.
Right I agree. The concern I have is that we have code active that isn't working, and if we don't intend it to be an entry point and/or want to fix the issues surrounding it, then let's close off the code path entirely (pref off what exists).
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
We should fix this, no doubt. about:apps is useful for developers, if nothing else. My only contention is that it is not a blocker.
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Anant Narayanan [:anant] from comment #4)
> We should fix this, no doubt. about:apps is useful for developers, if
> nothing else. My only contention is that it is not a blocker.
Here's an idea that I think could address both our perspectives - Could we pref about:apps off for FF 16? That way both perspectives being brought here are addressed (about:apps = not a priority & avoiding leaving code that kinda does not work active).
Although leaving the hanging fruit of keeping the code active on any build while it's not working may not be a good idea, especially since this isn't a priority right now. Perhaps the better approach is to keep about:apps hidden behind a pref?
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Let's talk post the AITC meeting on Tuesday about this with Bill (if he's available). I can probably clarify this better in person.
Comment 8•6 years ago
|
||
Dead component, closing bugs in it.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Web Apps → Web Apps Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•