Closed
Bug 777519
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
nsHTMLReflowState::InitResizeFlags unnecessarily checks for min-height:auto and max-height:auto
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect)
Core
Layout
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla17
People
(Reporter: dholbert, Assigned: dholbert)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
(deleted),
patch
|
dbaron
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
In bug 763689, I'm adding support for the new min-width / min-height: auto keyword. Before that bug's patches, we don't support "auto" for these properties.
However, nsHTMLReflowState::InitResizeFlags currently has this check:
> 533 bool dependsOnCBHeight =
[...]
> 537 (mStylePosition->MinHeightDependsOnContainer() &&
> 538 // FIXME: condition this on not-abspos?
> 539 mStylePosition->mMinHeight.GetUnit() != eStyleUnit_Auto) ||
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/layout/generic/nsHTMLReflowState.cpp#533
from this cset:
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/fcc2aa4bd451#l6.11
That "mMinHeight.GetUnit() != eStyleUnit_Auto" check is trivially true right now.
Moreover, after bug 763689 lets us have "auto" in computed-style, we explicitly *won't* want the check for 'auto' here. (since the used value of "min-height:auto" is either 0 or the item's intrinsic height -- it never depends on the container's height).
So, I think we want to just drop this line.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Daniel Holbert [:dholbert] from comment #0)
> That "mMinHeight.GetUnit() != eStyleUnit_Auto" check is trivially true right
> now.
That's true of the mMaxHeight check in the same chunk of code, too, actually.
max-height doesn't accept "auto", as shown here:
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/layout/style/nsCSSPropList.h#2064
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Summary: nsHTMLReflowState::InitResizeFlags incorrectly checks for min-height:auto → nsHTMLReflowState::InitResizeFlags unnecessarily checks for min-height:auto and max-height:auto
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #645896 -
Flags: review?(dbaron)
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
OS: Linux → All
Hardware: x86_64 → All
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
(reposting patch with 8 lines of context, instead of 3, to make it clearer)
Attachment #645896 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #645896 -
Flags: review?(dbaron)
Attachment #645904 -
Flags: review?(dbaron)
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 645904 [details] [diff] [review]
fix v1a
r=dbaron
Attachment #645904 -
Flags: review?(dbaron) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla17
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•