Closed Bug 789751 Opened 12 years ago Closed 9 years ago

Intermittent Android & B2G crashtest/reftest failures due to "load failed: null" (now "REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | load failed with unknown reason")

Categories

(Testing :: Reftest, defect)

ARM
Android
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED WORKSFORME

People

(Reporter: RyanVM, Unassigned)

References

(Depends on 1 open bug)

Details

Rather than filing individual bugs for these skewing orangefactor, it makes more sense in my opinion to have one bug tracking these failures.
Summary: Intermittent Android crashtest/reftest failure due to "load failed: null" → Intermittent Android crashtest/reftest failures due to "load failed: null"
Whiteboard: [orange]
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
Depends on: 896840
Summary: Intermittent Android crashtest/reftest failures due to "load failed: null" → Intermittent Android & B2G crashtest/reftest failures due to "load failed: null"
Depends on: 991134
Component: Other → Reftest
Product: Release Engineering → Testing
Version: other → Trunk
Do you think we should combine this and bug 720452?
Flags: needinfo?(dbaron)
Summary: Intermittent Android & B2G crashtest/reftest failures due to "load failed: null" → Intermittent Android & B2G crashtest/reftest failures due to "load failed: null" (now "REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | load failed with unknown reason")
Clearing old needinfo requests where I've given up expecting a response, to clear up my bugzilla-todos dashboard "to nag" list.
Flags: needinfo?(dbaron)
I like a humorously pointless randomorange bug as well as the next guy (okay, *way* more than the next guy), but shouldn't someone at some point notice that this bug is entirely about 394751.xhtml on b2g and panda, a test which is disabled on pretty much every *other* sort of mobilish thing, and disable it there as well?
(In reply to Phil Ringnalda (:philor) from comment #610) > I like a humorously pointless randomorange bug as well as the next guy > (okay, *way* more than the next guy), but shouldn't someone at some point > notice that this bug is entirely about 394751.xhtml on b2g and panda, a test > which is disabled on pretty much every *other* sort of mobilish thing, and > disable it there as well? The funny thing is that we even have bug 922976 for it even.
This has long since served its purpose, and now it's just a septic tank into which we blindly throw freshly broken things that should get either their own bugs or their own backouts.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.