Closed
Bug 793187
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
MMI Codes: Support PIN/PIN2/PUK handling via MMI codes
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Device Interfaces, defect, P1)
Core
DOM: Device Interfaces
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: ferjm, Assigned: ferjm)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [LOE:S])
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
(deleted),
patch
|
marshall
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
(deleted),
patch
|
marshall
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
As per device certification requirements, we need to support MMI codes for entering, changing and unlocking of PIN and PIN2 codes.
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Summary: MMI Codes: Support SIM/USIM handling MMI codes → MMI Codes: Support PIN/PIN2/PUK handling via MMI codes
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
blocking-basecamp: --- → ?
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → ferjmoreno
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Is this a P1 blockers or is it a nice-to-have?
Whiteboard: [blocked-on-input philikon]
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Andrew Overholt [:overholt] from comment #1)
> Is this a P1 blockers or is it a nice-to-have?
Blocker because device certification requirement.
Whiteboard: [blocked-on-input philikon]
Updated•12 years ago
|
blocking-basecamp: ? → +
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [LOE:S]
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
I consider this task as LOE:S once bug 793186 lands
Depends on: 793186
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #669884 -
Flags: review?(marshall)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #669885 -
Flags: review?(marshall)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Now without trailing whitespaces.
Attachment #669884 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #669884 -
Flags: review?(marshall)
Attachment #669886 -
Flags: review?(marshall)
Updated•12 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P1
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 669886 [details] [diff] [review]
Part 1: RIL
Review of attachment 669886 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Looks good, just two minor nits :)
::: dom/system/gonk/ril_worker.js
@@ +2327,5 @@
> options.errorMsg = errorMsg;
> this.sendDOMMessage(options);
> }).bind(this);
>
> + let _isValidICCRequest = function _isValidICCRequest() {
nit: does this need to be declared as a variable? (just using a named function should suffice, unless you meant to bind it?)
also, this function name seems overly broad if you're only validating registration MMI procedures..
Attachment #669886 -
Flags: review?(marshall) → review+
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 669885 [details] [diff] [review]
Part 2: Tests
Review of attachment 669885 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
\o/ for tests. Can you also add test case(s) for the new PINs being different (NEW_PIN_MISMATCH)? r=me with that
Attachment #669885 -
Flags: review?(marshall) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/c8eb7dfe8678
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/4807f1c1308e
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite+
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla19
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/557a3f5164e6
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/3a82fae11d50
status-firefox18:
--- → fixed
status-firefox19:
--- → fixed
Updated•12 years ago
|
Blocks: b2g-v1-certification
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•