Broken out from bug 790571 for clarity in respect to pushing all of the various parts to production.

Meant to say, per bug 793131, we're not going to try and filter the bugs returned from bzcache, since they should just be the orange bugs anyway.

(In reply to Ed Morley [:edmorley UTC+0] from comment #2) > Meant to say, per bug 793131, we're not going to try and filter the bugs > returned from bzcache, since they should just be the orange bugs anyway. Thinking about this more - whilst bzcache's bz_cache_refresh.py will only populate bz_cache with orange bugs, whenever TBPL submits a comment containing a non-orange bug number (eg infra issue), bzcache's get_bugs() will go out and fetch any bugs not already in the cache, so will still add non-intermittents. However, I don't see this as a problem, since it means that we'll be able to track transient infra issues on OF and see how they compare to the intermittents.

Comment on attachment 676789 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v1 Review of attachment 676789 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Can't test this atm but it looks good. Maybe file a bug to remove the references to whiteboard from bzcache as well? No point in having that specific use case left in there.

Comment on attachment 676789 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v1 Review of attachment 676789 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- I think this is good, but I haven't tested it either. I guess we'll test it when we deploy it. :)

In production.