Closed Bug 812063 Opened 12 years ago Closed 12 years ago

Support absolute library path in the symbolization script.

Categories

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: GonkIntegration, defect)

x86_64
Linux
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: nbp, Assigned: nbp)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

Currently the symbolization does not work at all if the library contained in the target_name variable contains the absolute path of the library instead of the name of it. The attached patch, or the git branch [1] is fixing this issue. I have no idea how to test it on B2G, but my guess is that this extra case should not cause any issue since this add a last "elif" and still check that the library is found. [1] https://github.com/nbp/B2G/compare/symbolicate-absolute-path-libraries
Attachment #681843 - Flags: review?(dhylands)
Comment on attachment 681843 [details] [diff] [review] Add support for libraries refered by an absolute path. Review of attachment 681843 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- What environment do these absolute paths appear in? I haven't seen these on the phone, so I'm guessing that you're using the script in another environment? I'm mostly just curious. Leaving as r? for now (I'll update once I hear back from you) ::: scripts/profile-symbolicate.py @@ +134,5 @@ > self.symbol_table_addresses = sorted(self.symbol_table.keys()) > + elif self.target_name[:1] == "/": # Absolute paths. > + basename = os.path.basename(self.target_name) > + dirname = os.path.dirname(self.target_name) > + lib_name = self.FindLibInTree(basename, dirname) Won't lib_name wind up being the same as self.target_name ? If so, can we just do lib_name = self.target_name if os.path.exists(lib_name): I have no objection with the code as presented if it's actually finding a library potentially different from the specified absolute path, but if its always just going to find the library specified, then we should just check for that.
(In reply to Dave Hylands [:dhylands] from comment #1) > Comment on attachment 681843 [details] [diff] [review] > Add support for libraries refered by an absolute path. > > Review of attachment 681843 [details] [diff] [review]: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > What environment do these absolute paths appear in? I haven't seen these on > the phone, so I'm guessing that you're using the script in another > environment? I'm mostly just curious. I am running NixOS (Linux x64), and taking details profiles (100µs) of JS benchmarks. Nix provides a GCC wrapper to set precise RPATH, such as a user can compile against isolated libraries, and so all libraries appear with absolute path in the JSON profile. This give the ability to compile against different library / toolchain without having to change the system or start a chroot / VM. > ::: scripts/profile-symbolicate.py > @@ +134,5 @@ > > self.symbol_table_addresses = sorted(self.symbol_table.keys()) > > + elif self.target_name[:1] == "/": # Absolute paths. > > + basename = os.path.basename(self.target_name) > > + dirname = os.path.dirname(self.target_name) > > + lib_name = self.FindLibInTree(basename, dirname) > > Won't lib_name wind up being the same as self.target_name ? > > If so, can we just do > > lib_name = self.target_name > if os.path.exists(lib_name): Ok, If we obtain an absolute path, then this probably already resolve the symbolic links, so I guess it is unlikely to be different. Using os.path.exists(lib_name) works on my system.
Assignee: nobody → nicolas.b.pierron
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment on attachment 681843 [details] [diff] [review] Add support for libraries refered by an absolute path. So I'll r- this patch. If you submit one which just uses the absolute path (and doesn't call FindLibInTree) then I'll r+ it.
Attachment #681843 - Flags: review?(dhylands) → review-
Modified patch as suggested, as was the github branch since 11 days.
Attachment #681843 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #685239 - Flags: review?(dhylands)
Comment on attachment 685239 [details] [diff] [review] Add support for libraries refered by an absolute path. Review of attachment 685239 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- r=me with nit fixed. And could you do a pull request? I'll merge it into the repository. Sorry I missed your change earlier (we don't normally check anywhere but the main repo and rely on the people doing the changes to do pull requests) ::: scripts/profile-symbolicate.py @@ +133,5 @@ > self.symbol_table = gSpecialLibs[self.target_name] > self.symbol_table_addresses = sorted(self.symbol_table.keys()) > + elif self.target_name[:1] == "/": # Absolute paths. > + basename = os.path.basename(self.target_name) > + dirname = os.path.dirname(self.target_name) nit: This doesn't seem to be used, so this line could be removed.
Attachment #685239 - Flags: review?(dhylands) → review+
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Component: General → Builds
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: