Closed Bug 833879 Opened 12 years ago Closed 12 years ago

Move layout/xul/base/src/tree/ to layout/xul/tree, layout/xul/base/src/grid to layout/xul/grid

Categories

(Core :: Layout, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla21

People

(Reporter: WeirdAl, Assigned: WeirdAl)

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

I'll have a patch for this tonight. Basically, the grid and tree code is buried deep, and tree has its own public, src subdirectories. I'd like to move them up in the hierarchy for two reasons: * Grids and trees are special cases for XUL layout; it's an inconvenience to go so deep in the source tree for changes. * I intend to add a TreeViews.jsm module with lots of (reftests/chrome Mochitests) somewhere under layout/xul/tree to help developers with custom tree views. The patch I have now is 1.1 MB, but it's almost all hg moves... it shouldn't be that bad.
cc'ing roc as module owner
Attached patch patch (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
hg diff --git to the rescue. Much smaller now. I'd love it if someone could run this through the tryserver!
Attachment #705441 - Flags: review?(roc)
Assignee: nobody → ajvincent
This is great... except I think it would have been nice to flatten the public/src pair within the tree/ directory at the same time (fewer file moves to track, and I think squashing that pair all into tree/ is preferable, though I'd be interested in the opinions of others).
Comment on attachment 705441 [details] [diff] [review] patch based on comment 5, canceling the checkin flag for now. I personally don't care much either way.
Attachment #705441 - Flags: checkin?
(In reply to David Baron [:dbaron] from comment #5) > This is great... except I think it would have been nice to flatten the > public/src pair within the tree/ directory at the same time (fewer file > moves to track, and I think squashing that pair all into tree/ is > preferable, though I'd be interested in the opinions of others). I think that's a good idea, but I think it would be fine to land the current patch and then do that as a followup. It would also be fine to fold that into this patch. Up to Alex.
I'll try to do the flattening over the next couple days - it won't take long, but I have limited time. If we get down to a week before train departure, I'd prefer we take the current patch as-is than wait for me to get the flattening done.
Attached patch patch with tree flattened (deleted) — Splinter Review
Once again, a tryserver run (this time with crashtests and reftests) is recommended. I've built it locally on my Mac, but I've not run the tests.
Attachment #705441 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #705746 - Flags: review?(roc)
I don't think a test run is needed as long as it builds. You're not actually changing any code here.
Attachment #705746 - Flags: checkin?
Comment on attachment 705746 [details] [diff] [review] patch with tree flattened Review of attachment 705746 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Note that this conflicts with bug 784841; I wouldn't mind if you waited a little before getting this pushed :) ::: content/events/src/Makefile.in @@ +80,5 @@ > -I$(srcdir)/../../../dom/settings \ > -I$(srcdir)/../../../dom/src/storage \ > -I$(srcdir)/../../../layout/generic \ > -I$(srcdir)/../../../layout/xul/base/src \ > + -I$(srcdir)/../../../layout/xul/tree/ \ Probably don't want the trailing slash here ::: content/xul/templates/src/Makefile.in @@ +50,5 @@ > include $(topsrcdir)/config/rules.mk > > LOCAL_INCLUDES = -I$(srcdir)/../../../base/src \ > -I$(srcdir)/../../content/src \ > + -I$(srcdir)/../../../../layout/xul/tree/ \ or here ::: layout/base/Makefile.in @@ +131,5 @@ > -I$(srcdir)/../forms \ > -I$(srcdir)/../tables \ > -I$(srcdir)/../printing \ > -I$(srcdir)/../xul/base/src \ > + -I$(srcdir)/../xul/tree/ \ or here
Comment on attachment 705746 [details] [diff] [review] patch with tree flattened *sigh* I forgot about the DIRS logic patch... how soon is that expected to land?
Attachment #705746 - Flags: checkin?
I hope in less than a week; depending on when ted reviews :)
Blocks: 835916
This does not look like a regression or has a user facing impact & not a release blocker, hence no need to track. Please feel free to renominate with reasoning if this is not the case. If this is not fixed within FX21 on nightly,will consider uplifts if necessary based on the risk & where we are in the cycle .
No longer blocks: 835916
Land it, this is taking longer than I expected.
Keywords: checkin-needed
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/bb45ceb51e82 Alex, can you please make sure that your hg is configured to generate all the needed checkin metadata for future patches? It makes life easier for those checking in on your behalf. Thanks! https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Creating_a_patch_that_can_be_checked_in
Keywords: checkin-needed
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla21
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: