Closed Bug 836898 Opened 12 years ago Closed 12 years ago

Update STS preload list

Categories

(Core :: Security, defect)

x86_64
Linux
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 844527

People

(Reporter: evilpie, Assigned: evilpie)

References

Details

Attachments

(2 files, 1 obsolete file)

Some websites changed. We should probably do this for every release?
Also we need to cordinate with Persona/browserid. (https://github.com/mozilla/browserid/issues/2903) They are rolling out a changed on feb 13th.
So, there's bug 836097 on file for getting this done automatically. If we're getting near(er) the merge date and we're not done with that, we can do it by hand.
We are getting close! I also wrote a patch that changes the update script, so that we don't abort if we are redirecting to an uri that is also on the STS list.
Last week we discussed that change. Basically we could always allow redirects, because we still check for the STS header. I still think we should only do it for pages, which were explicitly put onto the list.
Assignee: nobody → evilpies
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attached patch Updated list (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Updated list after applying the previous patch.

We still don't have persona.org, login.persona.org nor browserid!
Attachment #715498 - Flags: review?(dkeeler)
Attachment #715499 - Flags: review?(dkeeler)
Comment on attachment 715498 [details] [diff] [review]
Allow redirects to pages on the STS list

Review of attachment 715498 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

I think we would need the changes to getHSTSPreloadList.js in this patch.

Also, I maintain my skepticism that putting foo.com on the list when we get [foo.com 301 redirect without sts header] -> [www.foo.com with sts header] is the right thing to do (that's the goal here, right?). Certainly, putting www.foo.com on the list would be reasonable, but since foo.com has told us nothing of its HSTS state, if we're going to follow the spec, we can't consider it an HSTS host.

Also also, this should be a separate bug.
Attachment #715498 - Flags: review?(dkeeler)
Attached patch just the update (deleted) — Splinter Review
I am fine with not making the change here. This is the updated list with the old script.
Attachment #715499 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #715499 - Flags: review?(dkeeler)
Attachment #717334 - Flags: review?(dkeeler)
Comment on attachment 717334 [details] [diff] [review]
just the update

Review of attachment 717334 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

I think the patch in bug 844527 will supersede this one, so I'm clearing the review for now.
Attachment #717334 - Flags: review?(dkeeler)
I guess we can just dupe this now.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: