Closed Bug 837371 Opened 12 years ago Closed 12 years ago

crash in nsContainerFrame::BuildDisplayListForNonBlockChildren mainly with AMD Radeon HD 6xxx series

Categories

(Core :: Layout, defect)

19 Branch
x86
Windows 7
defect
Not set
critical

Tracking

()

RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Tracking Status
firefox18 --- unaffected
firefox19 - unaffected
firefox20 --- unaffected

People

(Reporter: scoobidiver, Unassigned)

References

Details

(Keywords: crash, regression, topcrash)

Crash Data

It first showed up in 19.0b4 and is #21 top browser crasher in the first hours of this version. The regression range is: http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta/pushloghtml?fromchange=8848df2565b6&tochange=e815122c4b1f I suspect the backout in Beta of bug 806256 or bug 807563. Signature nsContainerFrame::BuildDisplayListForNonBlockChildren(nsDisplayListBuilder*, nsRect const&, nsDisplayListSet const&, unsigned int) More Reports Search UUID 2c3879ad-1cbc-4edb-b19b-14d582130202 Date Processed 2013-02-02 09:05:12 Uptime 12731 Last Crash 4.3 hours before submission Install Age 8.0 hours since version was first installed. Install Time 2013-02-02 01:03:30 Product Firefox Version 19.0 Build ID 20130130080006 Release Channel beta OS Windows NT OS Version 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1 Build Architecture x86 Build Architecture Info AuthenticAMD family 20 model 1 stepping 0 Crash Reason EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_EXEC Crash Address 0x4346980f App Notes AdapterVendorID: 0x1002, AdapterDeviceID: 0x9803, AdapterSubsysID: 00000000, AdapterDriverVersion: 8.792.0.0 D2D? D2D+ DWrite? DWrite+ D3D10 Layers? D3D10 Layers+ Processor Notes sp-processor04.phx1.mozilla.com_30666:2008 EMCheckCompatibility True Adapter Vendor ID 0x1002 Adapter Device ID 0x9803 Total Virtual Memory 4294836224 Available Virtual Memory 3584851968 System Memory Use Percentage 48 Available Page File 3968004096 Available Physical Memory 1429270528 Frame Module Signature Source 0 @0x4346980f 1 xul.dll nsContainerFrame::BuildDisplayListForNonBlockChildren layout/generic/nsContainerFrame.cpp:334 2 xul.dll nsContainerFrame::BuildDisplayListForInline layout/generic/nsContainerFrame.h:406 3 xul.dll BuildDisplayListWithOverflowClip layout/generic/nsFrame.cpp:1715 4 xul.dll nsIFrame::BuildDisplayListForChild layout/generic/nsFrame.cpp:2235 5 xul.dll DisplayLine layout/generic/nsBlockFrame.cpp:6091 6 xul.dll nsBlockFrame::BuildDisplayList layout/generic/nsBlockFrame.cpp:6188 7 xul.dll nsIFrame::BuildDisplayListForChild layout/generic/nsFrame.cpp:2237 8 xul.dll nsCanvasFrame::BuildDisplayList layout/generic/nsCanvasFrame.cpp:317 9 xul.dll nsIFrame::BuildDisplayListForChild layout/generic/nsFrame.cpp:2237 10 xul.dll nsGfxScrollFrameInner::BuildDisplayList layout/generic/nsGfxScrollFrame.cpp:2072 11 xul.dll nsHTMLScrollFrame::BuildDisplayList layout/generic/nsGfxScrollFrame.h:377 12 xul.dll nsIFrame::BuildDisplayListForChild layout/generic/nsFrame.cpp:2237 13 xul.dll ViewportFrame::BuildDisplayList layout/generic/nsViewportFrame.cpp:73 14 xul.dll nsIFrame::BuildDisplayListForStackingContext layout/generic/nsFrame.cpp:1930 15 xul.dll nsSubDocumentFrame::BuildDisplayList layout/generic/nsSubDocumentFrame.cpp:369 16 xul.dll nsIFrame::BuildDisplayListForStackingContext layout/generic/nsFrame.cpp:1930 17 xul.dll nsIFrame::BuildDisplayListForChild layout/generic/nsFrame.cpp:2254 18 xul.dll nsStackFrame::BuildDisplayListForChildren layout/xul/base/src/nsStackFrame.cpp:61 ... 58 xul.dll nsRootBoxFrame::BuildDisplayList layout/xul/base/src/nsRootBoxFrame.cpp:213 59 xul.dll nsIFrame::BuildDisplayListForChild layout/generic/nsFrame.cpp:2237 60 xul.dll ViewportFrame::BuildDisplayList layout/generic/nsViewportFrame.cpp:73 61 xul.dll nsIFrame::BuildDisplayListForStackingContext layout/generic/nsFrame.cpp:1930 62 xul.dll nsLayoutUtils::PaintFrame layout/base/nsLayoutUtils.cpp:1855 63 xul.dll PresShell::Paint layout/base/nsPresShell.cpp:5356 64 xul.dll nsViewManager::ProcessPendingUpdatesForView view/src/nsViewManager.cpp:430 65 xul.dll nsViewManager::ProcessPendingUpdates view/src/nsViewManager.cpp:1218 66 xul.dll nsRefreshDriver::Notify layout/base/nsRefreshDriver.cpp:436 67 xul.dll nsTimerImpl::Fire xpcom/threads/nsTimerImpl.cpp:485 68 xul.dll nsTimerEvent::Run xpcom/threads/nsTimerImpl.cpp:565 69 xul.dll nsThread::ProcessNextEvent xpcom/threads/nsThread.cpp:627 70 xul.dll mozilla::ipc::MessagePump::Run ipc/glue/MessagePump.cpp:117 71 xul.dll MessageLoop::RunHandler ipc/chromium/src/base/message_loop.cc:208 72 xul.dll MessageLoop::Run ipc/chromium/src/base/message_loop.cc:182 73 xul.dll nsBaseAppShell::Run widget/xpwidgets/nsBaseAppShell.cpp:163 74 xul.dll nsAppShell::Run widget/windows/nsAppShell.cpp:229 75 xul.dll nsAppStartup::Run toolkit/components/startup/nsAppStartup.cpp:290 76 xul.dll XREMain::XRE_mainRun toolkit/xre/nsAppRunner.cpp:3823 77 xul.dll XREMain::XRE_main toolkit/xre/nsAppRunner.cpp:3890 78 xul.dll XRE_main toolkit/xre/nsAppRunner.cpp:4084 79 firefox.exe wmain toolkit/xre/nsWindowsWMain.cpp:105 More reports at: https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/list?signature=nsContainerFrame%3A%3ABuildDisplayListForNonBlockChildren%28nsDisplayListBuilder*%2C+nsRect+const%26%2C+nsDisplayListSet+const%26%2C+unsigned+int%29
It's currently #14 top browser crasher in 19.0b4 and correlated to ATI GPUs: nsContainerFrame::BuildDisplayListForNonBlockChildren(nsDisplayListBuilder*, nsRect const&, nsDisplayListSet const&, unsigned int)|EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_EXEC (37 crashes) 97% (36/37) vs. 3% (1878/54582) aticfx32.dll 95% (35/37) vs. 3% (1554/54582) atidxx32.dll 95% (35/37) vs. 3% (1572/54582) atiuxpag.dll Checking App Notes in crash reports shows it's restricted to 980<n> device IDs.
Blocks: 605780
Depends on: 772330
Keywords: topcrash
Summary: crash in nsContainerFrame::BuildDisplayListForNonBlockChildren → crash in nsContainerFrame::BuildDisplayListForNonBlockChildren mainly with AMD Radeon HD 6xxx series
Assignee: nobody → matt.woodrow
I don't see the correlation between bug 806256/807563 and this crash. The crashing code hasn't changed since hg1, and the crashing line doesn't dereference anything. I also can't see how this code could possibly be affected by device drivers.
Assignee: matt.woodrow → nobody
(In reply to Matt Woodrow (:mattwoodrow) from comment #3) > I don't see the correlation between bug 806256/807563 and this crash. It's not caused directly by those bugs but by the induced shift in layout addresses. See bug 772330.
We backed out bug 806256 and bug 807563 due to bug 832611, another top crasher. For bug 700288 (similar FF11 crash spike), we resolved bug 722538 and bug 755974. So it's not clear that we can blocklist anything to resolve this. Our options are: 1) Do nothing, hope beta 5/6 and the release build are unaffected 2) Do nothing, because this crash only accounts for 0.36% of crashes on b4 currently 3) Take bug 806256 and bug 807563 again, as well as the forward fix in bug 832611 4) ? What do you all think?
I don't see why we think taking any code change would affect this bug. If this in fact an instance of bug 772330, then it is merely a problem with a particular build that would probably not affect a subsequent build; probably even a subsequent build on the exact same changeset.
(In reply to Benjamin Smedberg [:bsmedberg] from comment #6) > I don't see why we think taking any code change would affect this bug. If > this in fact an instance of bug 772330 dbaron agreed with you over email - is there anything we can do to gain confidence that this is in fact an instance of bug 772330 (other than wait and see)?
No.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0 Build ID: 20130206083616 and Build ID: 20130130080006 I have a AMD Radeon HD 6450 GPU. I loaded about 50 web pages with lots of content, images, videos, charts, different fonts. I was able to crash FF 19 beta 4 (https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/bp-42aba14a-ffd1-4bec-a39a-b8a782130207) and beta 5 (https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/bp-64c89abb-7c94-451e-a43d-0f3b42130207 and https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/bp-d8f5f4b0-1696-4459-a23a-a10a92130207) but my crashes have no signature.
(In reply to Bogdan Maris [QA] from comment #9) I don't think your crashes are related to this bug. If you have reliable steps to reproduce, please file a new bug.
I spoke to Alex about this and he suggests we continue to track this so we can evaluate crashstats data for 19.0b5.
There are no crashes in 19.0b5.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
(In reply to Scoobidiver from comment #12) > There are no crashes in 19.0b5. That's great news. Thanks for keeping on top of this.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.