If an app doesn't have content ratings, the API currently returns an empty object `{}`. It should instead return null or a falsey value.

{} is falsey

Not in JavaScript.

Yeah ... >>> !!{} true We'd have to say, hey this an object, and do >>> Object.keys({}).length 0 I can see how this would complicate our existing logic, which is unfortunate. Curious: where exactly in the code are we tripping up on this?

Basically, our template says {% if this.content_ratings %} ... DEJUS this ... ... DEJUS that ... {% endif %} I realllyyy don't want to have to teach nunjucks to perform a separate truthiness test on objects.

(In reply to Matt Basta [:basta] from comment #4) > I realllyyy don't want to have to teach nunjucks to perform a separate > truthiness test on objects. Can you file a bug against nunjucks? That'd be hella sweet addition I think.

James has already said that he's not interested in changing the JS mechanics that exist in Nunjucks to match the ones in Python. That's why we have to shim in things like `.items()` and `.keys()` for objects. And unlike those bits, we couldn't just stick this in nunjucks.compat.js, we'd have to modify the compiler to generate a wrapper around conditionals.