Closed
Bug 879309
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
B2G: Sunspider regression, ss-cordic 22x slower [2013-05-21 … 2013-05-29]
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 875720
People
(Reporter: nbp, Assigned: nbp)
References
Details
AWFY was not running in this range of revisions. We need to investigate what was wrong there and if there is a way to fix this regression.
First bisecting to get a first range in terms of nightly, and then later try to do that in terms of unstable versions of inbound if this is not enough.
Updated•11 years ago
|
tracking-firefox24:
--- → ?
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
So far, I've been able to reduce it by using nightly builds.
http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/pushloghtml?fromchange=00b264c7cced&tochange=fe53a0780c6f
I will see if I can get a better regression range in the next days. Also, this regression seems to be visible in terms of UI responsiveness. I noticed extremely long pauses recently, some might be related.
Also, running cordic alone in b2g's browser does not seems to highlight the same regressions (like 10x faster).
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Nicolas B. Pierron [:nbp] from comment #1)
> So far, I've been able to reduce it by using nightly builds.
>
> http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/
> pushloghtml?fromchange=00b264c7cced&tochange=fe53a0780c6f
>
> I will see if I can get a better regression range in the next days. Also,
> this regression seems to be visible in terms of UI responsiveness. I
> noticed extremely long pauses recently, some might be related.
Hey nbp, any updates here ? Is this bug still a concern ?
>
> Also, running cordic alone in b2g's browser does not seems to highlight the
> same regressions (like 10x faster).
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to bhavana bajaj [:bajaj] from comment #2)
> Hey nbp, any updates here ? Is this bug still a concern ?
> >
> > Also, running cordic alone in b2g's browser does not seems to highlight the
> > same regressions (like 10x faster).
Yes, it is still a big concern, I am instrumenting B2G to add a bisect feature, because git-repo does not have any due to it way of handling repositories.
Bug 868598 added a reference to a mercurial changeset of gaia (don't ask), so I am trying to locate the map-file to at least avoid making mistakes by basing the rest of the bisect on the timestamp of the commits (which is wrong, but mostly correct)
As we do not keep images for inbound, I was unable to download Unagi's images to test a smaller regression range, so I will have to build the intermediate version my-self. I will use the idle time of hydra to build the extra images for me …
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Nicolas B. Pierron [:nbp] from comment #3)
> […] I will use the idle time of hydra to build
> the extra images for me …
Hydra is the server that I use for converting mozilla-central to git, and to run are-we-fast-yet on B2G.
Updated•11 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
I reduced it to [1], so this is a duplicate of Bug 875720.
[1] http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/pushloghtml?fromchange=7c89908125e71b8b65f5ed1f9bfdd37d8476a999&tochange=4370f503d69f321878e11c26d07bf17c4413cc58
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
status-firefox23:
unaffected → ---
status-firefox24:
affected → ---
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Updated•11 years ago
|
tracking-firefox24:
? → ---
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•