Closed
Bug 892427
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
[SIM Access API] Metabug: Secure Element (SIM) access API
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Device Interfaces, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 840780
People
(Reporter: frsela, Assigned: frsela)
References
()
Details
(Whiteboard: [u=commsapps-user c=stk p=0] )
Attachments
(1 file)
(deleted),
application/pdf
|
Details |
It's needed to define and implement a secure webapi for SIM access.
This API shall follow the GlobalPlatform and SIM Alliance standars.
This bug is a metacontainer for all related bugs (API/IDL definition, Platform code, security reviews, ...)
Component: DOM → DOM: Device Interfaces
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Additional information:
J2ME devices implements JSR177 (SATSA):
http://docs.oracle.com/javame/config/cldc/opt-pkgs/api/security/satsa-api/jsr177/
Android implements Seek4Android in which latests versions use the SIM Alliance API:
http://code.google.com/p/seek-for-android/
http://code.google.com/p/seek-for-android/downloads/detail?name=org.simalliance.openmobileapi.jar&can=4&q=
http://www.simalliance.org/en?t=/contentManager/selectCatalog&e=UTF-8&i=1185787014303&l=0&ParentID=1277732093632
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → frsela
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
Adding possible interested people from COMMS team.
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
Hello,
Attached the standard related to secure access element from Global Platform. Our aim is to develop the access based on Access Rule Files.
Regards,
JDs
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [u=commsapps-user c=stk p=0]
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
It seems to be already implemented in bug 840780 (https://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/dom/system/gonk/RadioInterfaceLayer.js#2605) so we mark this issue as duplicated of bug 840780.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
Hello,
Just to know, if this implementation is based on SEEK4Android API, SIM Alliance API or GP Secure Access standard?
Anyway, I made the same question in the bug 840780.
Thanks and Regards,
JDs
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•