Closed Bug 907085 Opened 11 years ago Closed 11 years ago

Crash [@ JSContext::hasOption] or [@ js::ion::IsBaselineEnabled]

Categories

(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)

x86_64
macOS
defect
Not set
critical

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla26

People

(Reporter: gkw, Assigned: luke)

References

Details

(Keywords: crash, regression, testcase, Whiteboard: [jsbugmon:update])

Crash Data

Attachments

(2 files)

Attached file stack (deleted) —
try { s.e } catch (e) {} o = o = s2 = /x/ for (let e in []); x = s2 schedulegc(21) eval("x.e=x.t") try { (function() { this.eval("\ (function(stdlib,fgn,heap) {\ \"use asm\";\ var Vie = new stdlib.Float64Array(heap);\ var Iew = new stdlib.Int8Array(heap);\ function f(){\ ent\ }\ })()\ ") })() } catch (e) {} crashes js debug (32-bit threadsafe deterministic) shell on m-c changeset b7f636fada9f with --baseline-eager at JSContext::hasOption with js::ion::IsBaselineEnabled on the stack. autoBisect shows this is probably related to the following changeset: The first bad revision is: changeset: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/a63f47fcbe98 user: Luke Wagner date: Thu Aug 08 22:51:29 2013 -0500 summary: Bug 902506 - OdinMonkey: remove main-thread restriction from js::CompileAsmJS (r=bhackett) Is bug 902506 a likely regressor?
Flags: needinfo?(luke)
Ah yeah, I made GetIonContext()->cx be NULL during asm.js compilation.
Assignee: general → luke
Flags: needinfo?(luke)
Attached patch fix and test (deleted) — Splinter Review
With bug 905827, parsing, and therefore Odin compilation, will be able to happen off the main thread. That means js::CompileAsmJS takes an ExclusiveContext and the IonContext pushed during compilation has a NULL cx (as well as JSRuntime/IonCompartment/IonRuntime). GetIonContext()->cx is being used in GC for the purpose of rooting, but instead we can just use the JSRuntime we get from being on the main thread.
Attachment #792842 - Flags: review?(jdemooij)
Comment on attachment 792842 [details] [diff] [review] fix and test Review of attachment 792842 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: js/src/jit/BaselineJIT.cpp @@ +925,1 @@ > for (; !iter.done(); ++iter) { Nice, we can now write this loop as for (JitActivationIterator iter(rt); !iter.done(); ++iter) { ... } and remove the iter.done() call + the comment before the loop.
Attachment #792842 - Flags: review?(jdemooij) → review+
(In reply to Jan de Mooij [:jandem] from comment #3) Beautiful! https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/27cf1ae86abf
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite+
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla26
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: