Closed
Bug 907085
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Crash [@ JSContext::hasOption] or [@ js::ion::IsBaselineEnabled]
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla26
People
(Reporter: gkw, Assigned: luke)
References
Details
(Keywords: crash, regression, testcase, Whiteboard: [jsbugmon:update])
Crash Data
Attachments
(2 files)
(deleted),
text/plain
|
Details | |
(deleted),
patch
|
jandem
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
try {
s.e
} catch (e) {}
o = o = s2 = /x/
for (let e in []);
x = s2
schedulegc(21)
eval("x.e=x.t")
try {
(function() {
this.eval("\
(function(stdlib,fgn,heap) {\
\"use asm\";\
var Vie = new stdlib.Float64Array(heap);\
var Iew = new stdlib.Int8Array(heap);\
function f(){\
ent\
}\
})()\
")
})()
} catch (e) {}
crashes js debug (32-bit threadsafe deterministic) shell on m-c changeset b7f636fada9f with --baseline-eager at JSContext::hasOption with js::ion::IsBaselineEnabled on the stack.
autoBisect shows this is probably related to the following changeset:
The first bad revision is:
changeset: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/a63f47fcbe98
user: Luke Wagner
date: Thu Aug 08 22:51:29 2013 -0500
summary: Bug 902506 - OdinMonkey: remove main-thread restriction from js::CompileAsmJS (r=bhackett)
Is bug 902506 a likely regressor?
Flags: needinfo?(luke)
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Ah yeah, I made GetIonContext()->cx be NULL during asm.js compilation.
Assignee: general → luke
Flags: needinfo?(luke)
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
With bug 905827, parsing, and therefore Odin compilation, will be able to happen off the main thread. That means js::CompileAsmJS takes an ExclusiveContext and the IonContext pushed during compilation has a NULL cx (as well as JSRuntime/IonCompartment/IonRuntime). GetIonContext()->cx is being used in GC for the purpose of rooting, but instead we can just use the JSRuntime we get from being on the main thread.
Attachment #792842 -
Flags: review?(jdemooij)
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 792842 [details] [diff] [review]
fix and test
Review of attachment 792842 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
::: js/src/jit/BaselineJIT.cpp
@@ +925,1 @@
> for (; !iter.done(); ++iter) {
Nice, we can now write this loop as
for (JitActivationIterator iter(rt); !iter.done(); ++iter) {
...
}
and remove the iter.done() call + the comment before the loop.
Attachment #792842 -
Flags: review?(jdemooij) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jan de Mooij [:jandem] from comment #3)
Beautiful!
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/27cf1ae86abf
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite+
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla26
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•