Closed
Bug 95011
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
Evangelism - Asking the webmasters to support mozilla
Categories
(Tech Evangelism Graveyard :: English US, enhancement, P1)
Tech Evangelism Graveyard
English US
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: tomer, Assigned: bc)
Details
(Whiteboard: aok)
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010801
BuildID: not required
After using Mozilla for a time, I found that most of the sites on the web
support Mozilla even without the webmasters wish to, but in the meantime, some
sites uses explorer-only keywords, or put a warning screen to any browser the
webmaster don't have in his/her own computer, and sometimes even then denies the
access to the site.
Reproducible: Sometimes
Expected Results:
What I wish to see in the future Mozilla builds is a "contact webmaster" option
(very old browsers, such as lynx has this option...), probably in the debug
menu, and then to send him/her a letter, describing that the site doesn't apper
well in some browsers, and asking to design the site to non explorer-ish
browsers. It will be great if the message will be sent immediately, without
opening any mail client, without telling the webmaster my details (even my email
address...), and without the ISP SMTP server (-directly to the destation).
This feature can be removed, in my opinion, in the offical release, or any time
alike.
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
If a site doesn't work in Mozilla, file a bug in the Tech Evangelism product and
the webmaster will be contacted. It's slower but probably more effective.
There's also the problem that a site may not display because of a bug in Mozilla
in which vase contacting the webmaster would be fruitless.
Reassigning to Tech Evangelism to make the final call on this issue.
Component: Browser-General → US English
Product: Browser → Tech Evangelism
Version: other → unspecified
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
Reassigning to default owner and QA contact.
Assignee: asa → bclary
QA Contact: doronr → zach
We actually talked about this @MozDev Day2 and NY. The idea was to write a
plugin component that allowed you to capture enough information (ideally
hunting for contact information and automatically analyzing the site for
problems). I'm not sure if anyone ever filed a bug report about it.
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
hmm, this could be an interesting idea. Rubberstamp confirming to get
this off my hot list.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
We've considered such a thing, at least in a web based format, for reporting
problems either to webmasters or to a newsgroup/mailing list.
Reporting to the webmaster is problematic since it is so hard to find contact
info for most sites.
I think allowing 'normal' people to submit sites to a newsgroup where we could
track the most popular sites that need evanging is a good idea. The subject
should contain the domain in question so we can group reports by site. This
would be relatively painless to implement: a simple sidebar, and a newsgroup on
mozilla.org with an email front end. We could promote it on the
devedge/evangelism site to get more 'normal' users although that would include
lots of NS6.x users.
Priority P1 to get on the radar. If no one really cares about this I will mark
it WONT FIX in a few days.
What do you think? Should we pursue this?
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•24 years ago
|
||
really P1 this time.
Summary: Asking the webmasters to support mozilla → Evangelism - Asking the webmasters to support mozilla
Assignee | ||
Updated•24 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P1
Comment 7•23 years ago
|
||
I see no problem with pursuing this other than the obvious - who will maintain
such a beast?
Whiteboard: aok
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•23 years ago
|
||
considering my comment from 8/15, it is doa. Too much to do to and we are in no
shortage of sites to evangelize. -> doa
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Updated•10 years ago
|
Product: Tech Evangelism → Tech Evangelism Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•