Initial Questions: Project/Feature Name: Changeset-oriented review tool Tracking ID: Description: Problem: our code review tooling is inefficient from developer perspective and infrastructure perspective: * A proper review tool is key to implementing autoland(https://wiki.mozilla.org/ReleaseEngineering:Autoland) in way that simplifies the rest of our infrastructure * properly implemented review + autoland process will let us get rid of mozilla-inbound, and redundant try runs. ** This means faster turnarounds ** Up to 50% savings in our infrastructure load * This will save developers a lot of time, possibly hours per week. Additional Information: https://github.com/ehsan/reviewtool Key Initiative: Firefox Platform Release Date: 2014-02-01 Project Status: active Mozilla Data: No Mozilla Related: Bugzilla, hg.mozilla.org, Release Process Separate Party: Yes Type of Relationship: Other Data Access: No Privacy Policy: Vendor Cost: <= $25,000

Bug 961266 - Legal Review: Changeset-oriented review tool

Not sure if I should bring this up here, but thought I might anyway (cross posted from bug 947596): Over the weekend, smacleod and I hacked on a mechanism for creating Review Board review requests with a push-based work flow. This only took us a few hours, and is mostly a proof-of-concept. There are some edge cases and concerns that we'll need to deal with, but we feel pretty good about what we came up with: Demo video: https://vimeo.com/86448355 Code: https://github.com/mikeconley/rb-repo Feedback welcome in bug 947596!

(In reply to comment #2) > Not sure if I should bring this up here, but thought I might anyway (cross > posted from bug 947596): > > Over the weekend, smacleod and I hacked on a mechanism for creating Review > Board review requests with a push-based work flow. > > This only took us a few hours, and is mostly a proof-of-concept. There are some > edge cases and concerns that we'll need to deal with, but we feel pretty good > about what we came up with: > > Demo video: https://vimeo.com/86448355 > Code: https://github.com/mikeconley/rb-repo > > Feedback welcome in bug 947596! FWIW we're going ahead with RB.