Closed Bug 986400 Opened 11 years ago Closed 11 years ago

Sync does not start in SeaMonkey 2.28a1

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: Sync UI, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(seamonkey2.28 fixed)

RESOLVED FIXED
seamonkey2.28
Tracking Status
seamonkey2.28 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: hhofer42, Assigned: philip.chee)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/31.0 SeaMonkey/2.28a1 (Beta/Release) Build ID: 20140320003001 Steps to reproduce: Starting SeaMonkey (or manually triggering a sync) Actual results: An error message in the log: > Error: NS_ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND: Component returned failure code: 0x80520012 (NS_ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND) [nsIXPCComponents_Utils.import] > Source File: resource://gre/modules/services-sync/browserid_identity.js > Line: 23 The offending line is: > Cu.import("resource://gre/modules/FxAccounts.jsm"); Expected results: The 'FxAccounts.jsm' and dependent modules should have been included in 'omni.ja'
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
OS: Windows XP → All
Hardware: x86 → All
I wonder how FF packages the missing file. The only place of reference I could find was /mozilla/services/fxaccounts/moz.build. Nothing in any package-manifest.in.
I have a patch, building now.
Depends on: 976002
(In reply to Jens Hatlak (:InvisibleSmiley) from comment #1) > I wonder how FF packages the missing file. The only place of reference I > could find was /mozilla/services/fxaccounts/moz.build. Nothing in any > package-manifest.in. It's in suite/confvars.sh we need to port the change from mozilla/browser/confvars.sh
Attached patch Patch v1.0 One line fix. (deleted) — Splinter Review
Assignee: nobody → philip.chee
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #8395420 - Flags: review?(jh)
Attachment #8395420 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
Comment on attachment 8395420 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v1.0 One line fix. Review of attachment 8395420 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- my only concern here is that we don't actually have UX/UI around "Firefox Accounts" and merely around "Sync" two different backends entirely. I Know we want "<> Accounts" working of course.
Attachment #8395420 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek) → review+
(In reply to Justin Wood (:Callek) from comment #5) > my only concern here is that we don't actually have UX/UI around "Firefox > Accounts" and merely around "Sync" two different backends entirely. I Know > we want "<> Accounts" working of course. I intend to get our Sync UI updated, then I'll look into FxAccounts (or would it be SmAccounts?)
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → seamonkey2.28
Attachment #8395420 - Flags: review?(jh)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: