Closed
Bug 1020473
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Make Jetpack meet the TBPL visibility requirements
Categories
(Add-on SDK Graveyard :: General, defect, P1)
Add-on SDK Graveyard
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: emorley, Unassigned)
References
Details
At present, Jetpack sadly doesn't meet the visibility requirements for TBPL.
Notably:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Sheriffing/Job_Visibility_Policy#6.29_Outputs_failures_in_a_TBPL-starrable_format
In the form of bug 1020458 and bug 1020463.
In addition, the intermittent failure rate is quite high at present.
As such Jetpack, has been hidden from the default TBPL view for all trunk trees (it was already hidden on Windows 7 for bug 942111 / bug 981003).
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
To view the jobs, you'll need to use the &showall=1 param:
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?showall=1&jobname=jetpack
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Mozilla-Inbound&showall=1&jobname=jetpack
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=B2g-Inbound&showall=1&jobname=jetpack
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Fx-Team&showall=1&jobname=jetpack
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
18:40 <philor> edmorley|sheriffduty: and once they finish timing out, https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Mozilla-Inbound&jobname=jetpack&showall=1&fromchange=223a185a7ee2&tochange=bf5c893c2733 should show that it was bug 997894 that we didn't see breaking jetpack
I've backed out bug 997894 - however the overall failure rate and the lack of timeout handling/test names given as 'unknown' are still problematic.
Updated•10 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P1
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → evold
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
Hidden on try to match inbound
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Jetpack tests are currently orange on every platform on trunk, was regressed by:
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Fx-Team&showall=1&jobname=jetpack&rev=fea2a90e2d22
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
For the record, the test-child_process tests have been disabled, https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk/commit/8e68d49c71bac4202c689d6d677a8aed77f05dd4
So bug 979675, bug 979334, and bug 979039 should no longer be an issue at the moment, and I think we should remove them as blockers for this now at least.
Does this sound ok to you Ed?
Flags: needinfo?(emorley)
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
Yeah, if tests have been disabled, the intermittent (or permanent) failure bugs for them are definitely not blockers to this any more :-)
JP is still orange though:
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Fx-Team&showall=1&jobname=jetpack
Flags: needinfo?(emorley)
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
I wanted to try to work on this more, but I'm not sure that I will be able to now.
Assignee: evold → nobody
> JP is still orange though:
> https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Fx-Team&showall=1&jobname=jetpack
Shu, this sounds like temporal dead zone stuff, right?
TypeError: redeclaration of variable sliceTest
Flags: needinfo?(shu)
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to David Major [:dmajor] from comment #8)
> > JP is still orange though:
> > https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Fx-Team&showall=1&jobname=jetpack
>
> Shu, this sounds like temporal dead zone stuff, right?
>
> TypeError: redeclaration of variable sliceTest
Most of that stuff has already been fixed in github and needs to be uplifted.
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
That's right, if it's a newly surfaced "redeclaration" error, it's almost guaranteed to be TDZ.
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment 23•10 years ago
|
||
Ugh, having tbpl spam this bug is extremely unhelpful
Comment 24•10 years ago
|
||
Not arguing with you on that (not sure why he's starring jobs that are supposed to be hidden anyway), but FYI, you can hide the comments entirely using the "Hide TinderboxPushlog Comments" to the right.
Reporter | ||
Comment 25•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM UTC-4] from comment #24)
> Not arguing with you on that (not sure why he's starring jobs that are
> supposed to be hidden anyway), but FYI, you can hide the comments entirely
> using the "Hide TinderboxPushlog Comments" to the right.
The TBPLbot comments are treeherder-style message formatting; https://treeherder.mozilla.org/ui/#/jobs?repo=try&searchQuery=jetpack has jetpack jobs not hidden - could you tweak the profile? :-)
Comment 26•10 years ago
|
||
Hidden on Try
Updated•10 years ago
|
Blocks: sdk-test-issues
Updated•10 years ago
|
Severity: normal → critical
Comment 27•10 years ago
|
||
I'm going to assert that with mochitest-jetpack we're now at the point where jetpack tests meet the required standards. Opt builds have been green since they were turned on, aside from some windows failures which were actually detecting a regression in mozilla-central. There may still be some intermittents left but they are low enough that I don't think they should block us further at this point. We should start disabling tests if they are too intermittent.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•