Closed
Bug 1029943
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
[Text selection] Enable selection carets on B2G and fix the existing test case failures
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Selection, defect, P1)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla36
People
(Reporter: slee, Assigned: TYLin)
References
Details
Attachments
(5 files, 11 obsolete files)
(deleted),
text/plain
|
Details | |
(deleted),
patch
|
TYLin
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
(deleted),
patch
|
TYLin
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
(deleted),
patch
|
TYLin
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
(deleted),
patch
|
Ms2ger
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Comment hidden (obsolete) |
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
Since bug 1016184 which turn on touch caret on B2G will be landed soon, let me to steal this bug, and change it to "Enable selection carets on B2G."
Summary: [Touch Caret] Enable touch caret on B2G → [Text selection] Enable selection carets on B2G and fix the existing test case failures
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Try result after selection carets is enabled.
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=695d172644e3
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → tlin
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment hidden (obsolete) |
Comment hidden (obsolete) |
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
These test cases compare between non-edit and editable elements. So we should disable these tests.
Attachment #8472129 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8476431 -
Flags: review?(ehsan)
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
Some test cases would capture screenshot after element is blurred. If element is blurred, we should hide the selection carets.
Attachment #8476432 -
Flags: review?(roc)
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=56c8c6182bfa
latest try run
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
Rebased. We should wait until all tests are green.
Attachment #8472130 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8476472 -
Flags: review?(ehsan)
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8476431 [details] [diff] [review]
Fix reftest fails on 824080-3/5/7.html, bug558663.html.
Review of attachment 8476431 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
(Splinter doesn't seem to like this patch...)
+ <script>
+ // Selection caret's pref is checked only when PresShell is initialized. To turn
+ // off the pref, we test bug 558663 in an iframe.
+ SpecialPowers.pushPrefEnv({"set": [['selectioncaret.enabled', false]]}, function() {
+ var iframe = document.createElement("iframe");
+ iframe.src = "bug558663.html";
+ document.getElementById('container').appendChild(iframe);
+ });
+ </script>
You need to use SimpleTest.waitForExplicitFinish and SimpleTest.finish to make sure the test framework waits for these tests to be finished before loading the next page. Also, in the test iframe you should not use your own copy of the SimpleTest.js API. Usually people define shim functions like this at the beginning of their test frame code to forward all of the calls to these testing functions to the SimpleTest framework loaded in the main test page:
var ok = parent.ok;
var is = parent.is;
// same for todo, isnot, etc if you need them.
Attachment #8476431 -
Flags: review?(ehsan) → review-
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8476472 -
Flags: review?(ehsan) → review+
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
About B2G ICS Emulator Debug mochitest 9 timeout, I did some experiments. I found disable selection carets, test_collapse.html would running about 78 seconds. But when I enabled selection carets, it running about 476 seconds so that it would timeout mochitest in try server.
Next, I commented out sendAsyncMsg at BrowserElementChildPreload.js [1], then it reduced to 170 seconds.
Then, I commented out addEventListener for mozselectionchange at BrowserElementChildPreload.js [2], then it reduced to 79 seconds.
So I think selection carets increased too much overhead here, Ehsan, do you have any suggestions?
I have some opinions,
1) Only send mozselectionchange when we have specific reason, so that we can reduce overhead. Add this change test case running about 80 seconds which is good!
2) Increase timeout from 330 seconds to maybe 600 seconds so the testcase won't timeout.
3) Split test case into many smaller test cases.
[1]: http://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/dom/browser-element/BrowserElementChildPreload.js#658
[2]: http://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/dom/browser-element/BrowserElementChildPreload.js#210
Flags: needinfo?(ehsan)
Attachment #8476432 -
Flags: review?(roc) → review+
Comment 12•10 years ago
|
||
I would be fine with increasing the timeout on that test, I think. But note that this is an upstream test (from https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/editing), so you need to convince either Aryeh or Ms2ger about increasing the timeout.
Flags: needinfo?(ehsan)
Flags: needinfo?(ayg)
Flags: needinfo?(Ms2ger)
Comment 14•10 years ago
|
||
If you're asking about test_runtest.html, it's not really maintained upstream, so it's safe enough to fork it. I do have a project to split it up so it's not so ridiculously unwieldy (bug 1008146), but I don't know if I'll get to it in the foreseeable future. The current location in the tree does suggest it's imported, though, so if you make any significant changes there's always the risk they'll get overwritten sometime in the future. Maybe disable the import script for editing somehow with a comment explaining why, if you're doing anything that you don't want overwritten.
Flags: needinfo?(ayg)
Comment 15•10 years ago
|
||
Update to address comment.
Attachment #8476431 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8478817 -
Flags: review?(ehsan)
Comment 16•10 years ago
|
||
This patch is for mozilla-central. But I need modify upstream as well. Ms2ger, how do I modify upstream? Provide a patch for upstream or there is other way to do this? Thanks.
Attachment #8478819 -
Flags: review?(ehsan)
Flags: needinfo?(Ms2ger)
Comment 18•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8478817 [details] [diff] [review]
Fix reftest fails on 824080-3/5/7.html, bug558663.html v2.
Review of attachment 8478817 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
::: layout/base/tests/bug558663.html
@@ +8,2 @@
> <script type="application/javascript" src="/tests/SimpleTest/EventUtils.js"></script>
> <script type="application/javascript" src="/tests/SimpleTest/WindowSnapshot.js"></script>
You should forward the stuff coming from these two scripts to the parent similar to ok and SimpleTest below...
Attachment #8478817 -
Flags: review?(ehsan) → review-
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8478819 -
Flags: review?(ehsan) → review+
Comment 19•10 years ago
|
||
Update address comment.
Attachment #8478817 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8479685 -
Flags: review?(ehsan)
Comment 20•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8479685 [details] [diff] [review]
Fix reftest fails on 824080-3/5/7.html, bug558663.html v3.
Review of attachment 8479685 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Looks great!
Attachment #8479685 -
Flags: review?(ehsan) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 21•10 years ago
|
||
Rebased.
Attachment #8476472 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8481168 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•10 years ago
|
||
Update since v3 is corrupt.
Attachment #8481168 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8481174 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 23•10 years ago
|
||
Latest try result. We still have an orange M-10 on B2G ICS Emulator Debug.
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=3b865f4dcb21
Comment 24•10 years ago
|
||
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=7ff721c347c8
Here is revision from August 1st and apply 4 patches which are provided in this bug. All tries are green. So there is something wrong since August 1st.
Assignee | ||
Comment 25•10 years ago
|
||
Apply all patches in this bug on master, and disable touch caret. All green ...
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=bbb1a64c8b1c
Assignee | ||
Comment 26•10 years ago
|
||
Another try results which have M-10 failure on different test case, but the call stack are the same with Comment 23. Both failures are at the end of the test, which seem like a shutdown crash.
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=0ca253c83134
Updated•10 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P1
Assignee | ||
Comment 27•10 years ago
|
||
Steps to efficiently reproduce M-10 crash locally:
1) Modify dom/tests/mochitest/bugs/mochitest.ini so that it only contains [test_bug265203.html] and [test_bug346659.html].
2) $ ./mach mochitest-remote dom/tests/mochitest/bugs/
The callstack is attached as CheckAcquire_callstack.txt
Comment 28•10 years ago
|
||
latest try run: https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=9e56b6d715e4
Looks like only Cpp test failed. But other tries also failed on this test recently. So it should be ok.
Keywords: checkin-needed
Assignee | ||
Comment 29•10 years ago
|
||
The Cpp test fail is a known issue.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1062937
Comment 30•10 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/b2g-inbound/rev/c0e37fa863dd
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/b2g-inbound/rev/f125a36df1d5
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/b2g-inbound/rev/af2b2c407cf7
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/b2g-inbound/rev/5d1c0e2b1bd2
Flags: in-testsuite+
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 31•10 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/c0e37fa863dd
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/f125a36df1d5
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/af2b2c407cf7
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/5d1c0e2b1bd2
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla35
Comment 32•10 years ago
|
||
Awesome! Thanks for all of your hard work on this guys.
Comment 33•10 years ago
|
||
Comment 34•10 years ago
|
||
This was the backout asked in bug 1066515
Updated•10 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Target Milestone: mozilla35 → ---
Assignee | ||
Comment 35•10 years ago
|
||
After resolving bug 1066515 and bug 1065955, the performance of word suggestion and correction in message app shouldn't be a problem now. We can enable copy/paste on B2G again.
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/ui/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=08d4f7dfd26f
Comment 36•10 years ago
|
||
Keep in mind I have observed there is a timeout failure in test_extend.html test. Like this try push ( https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=248161574608 ). Please see emulator mochitest-5. So, let wait and see if latest try run still have this failure!
Assignee | ||
Comment 37•10 years ago
|
||
The test_extend.html is actually timeout on B2G ICS Emulator opt Mochitest-4 in comment 35 after enabling selection carets. (Treeherder is green though ...) And I found that the way we double the timeout for test_collapse.html in attachment 8478819 [details] [diff] [review] might not be correct. The running time of test_collapse.html is too short, and it makes feel that the test does not run.
I will try rebase those patches, and double the timeout for test_extend.html and test_collapse.html by using SimpleTest.requestLongerTimeout();
Status: REOPENED → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 38•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8476432 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8515054 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 39•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8479685 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8515056 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 40•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8478819 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 41•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8481174 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8515058 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 42•10 years ago
|
||
Try result for the new part 3.
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/ui/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=03be5056d309
Assignee | ||
Comment 43•10 years ago
|
||
Per comment 37, if I enable selection caret on b2g, test_extend.html and test_collapse.html will timeout on B2G ICS Emulator. Since we set "explicit_timeout": true in [1], no timeout should be set by testharness.js. So the only timeout should be set by TestRunner.js. However, my attempt to use SimpleTest.requestLongerTimeout(2); in part3 does not work as comment 42 shown. Simply including SimpleTest.js in the two tests introduces errors.
Aryeh and Ms2ger, I need your advice on how to correctly increase the timeout limit on these two tests.
Disabling tests on b2g should be treated as a last resort, right? Thought some tests had being disabled on b2g in [2].
[1] http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/annotate/0e631971b841/dom/imptests/testharnessreport.js#l307
[2] http://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/dom/imptests/editing/mochitest.ini
Flags: needinfo?(ayg)
Flags: needinfo?(Ms2ger)
Comment 44•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8515057 [details] [diff] [review]
Part 3 - Double timeout for test_collapse.html and test_extend.html. (v2)
No, this isn't going to work. Perhaps something like
if (W3CTest.runner) {
W3CTest.runner.requestLongerTimeout(2);
}
will.
Assignee | ||
Comment 45•10 years ago
|
||
test_extend.html and test_collapse.html run in B2G ICS Emulator opt Mochitest-4
and debug Mochitest-10.
Try result:
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/ui/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=5991c01071b3
Attachment #8515057 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8515605 -
Flags: review?(Ms2ger)
Comment 46•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8515605 [details] [diff] [review]
Part 3 - Double timeout for test_collapse.html and test_extend.html. r=Ms2ger (v3)
Review of attachment 8515605 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
r=me if it works.
Attachment #8515605 -
Flags: review?(Ms2ger) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 47•10 years ago
|
||
The try fails in comment 45 seem to be known issues on m-c.
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 48•10 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/64d22f9fa38f
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/7466944d5a5d
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/0dff0452893f
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/eb2252b32e57
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 49•10 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/64d22f9fa38f
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/7466944d5a5d
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/0dff0452893f
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/eb2252b32e57
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago → 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla36
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.