Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Description • 10 years ago

      No description provided.

	Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Comment 2 • 10 years ago

Comment on attachment 8457683 [details] [diff] [review]
b2g_tag

http://hg.mozilla.org/build/mozharness/rev/34c5d8272f03

	Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Comment 8 • 10 years ago

Comment on attachment 8457705 [details] [diff] [review]
b2g32_tbpl

https://hg.mozilla.org/webtools/tbpl/rev/35fc0b71256f

	Pete Moore [:pmoore][:pete]
	Comment 9 • 10 years ago

Comment on attachment 8457707 [details] [diff] [review]
b2g32_beagle

Review of attachment 8457707 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Nice work Aki.

::: configs/vcs_sync/beagle.py
@@ +254,5 @@
> +            "tag_config": {
> +                "tag_regexes": [
> +                    "^B2G_",
> +                ],
> +            },

This tag_config is the same as the tag_config below (lines 266 to 270). I think this isn't needed, because I believe if it is not provided by the specific target, it is taken from the generic cross-target tag_config section (http://hg.mozilla.org/build/mozharness/file/7e18e11a38be/scripts/vcs-sync/vcs_sync.py#l500).

However, it should not hurt, and it would be consistent with the other branches in this config file - but I believe it may be redundant to define it in both places.

	Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Comment 10 • 10 years ago

(In reply to Pete Moore [:pete][:pmoore] from comment #9)
> ::: configs/vcs_sync/beagle.py
> @@ +254,5 @@
> > +            "tag_config": {
> > +                "tag_regexes": [
> > +                    "^B2G_",
> > +                ],
> > +            },
> 
> This tag_config is the same as the tag_config below (lines 266 to 270). I
> think this isn't needed, because I believe if it is not provided by the
> specific target, it is taken from the generic cross-target tag_config
> section
> (http://hg.mozilla.org/build/mozharness/file/7e18e11a38be/scripts/vcs-sync/
> vcs_sync.py#l500).
> 
> However, it should not hurt, and it would be consistent with the other
> branches in this config file - but I believe it may be redundant to define
> it in both places.

Aha.  Sure, up to you.  Might be a safety net, might be a pain keeping them in sync; I think I agree it's probably the latter.

	Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Comment 11 • 10 years ago

Looks complete based on https://wiki.mozilla.org/ReleaseEngineering/Merge_Duty/Steps#Add_to_Graphs .

	Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Comment 12 • 10 years ago

Comment on attachment 8457707 [details] [diff] [review]
b2g32_beagle

Committed without the duplicate tag_config.
https://hg.mozilla.org/build/mozharness/rev/c5821474653e

	Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Comment 13 • 10 years ago

Comment on attachment 8457701 [details] [diff] [review]
b2g32_custom

https://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbotcustom/rev/433adf0b3644

	Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Comment 14 • 10 years ago

Comment on attachment 8457700 [details] [diff] [review]
b2g32_configs

https://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/rev/7707449277f1

	Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Comment 15 • 10 years ago

Comment on attachment 8457702 [details] [diff] [review]
b2g32_tools

https://hg.mozilla.org/build/tools/rev/a5d1390ed38a

	Hal Wine [:hwine] (use NI)
	Comment 16 • 10 years ago

Comment on attachment 8458122 [details] [diff] [review]
graphs

Review of attachment 8458122 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

lgtm

	Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Comment 18 • 10 years ago

Since bug 1022907 isn't fixed yet.

	Hal Wine [:hwine] (use NI)
	Comment 20 • 10 years ago

Comment on attachment 8458447 [details] [diff] [review]
bump_bb-c_versions

Review of attachment 8458447 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

lgtm

	Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM]
	Comment 21 • 10 years ago

(In reply to Aki Sasaki [:aki] from comment #8)
> https://hg.mozilla.org/webtools/tbpl/rev/35fc0b71256f

In production :)

	Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Comment 22 • 10 years ago

In production.

	Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Comment 23 • 10 years ago

Comment on attachment 8458122 [details] [diff] [review]
graphs

http://hg.mozilla.org/graphs/rev/632a9d16cb0d

	Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Comment 24 • 10 years ago

It looks like we were intentionally only building dolphin on 1.4, like we're only building Tarako on 1.3t.  Re-disabling...

	Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Comment 25 • 10 years ago

Comment on attachment 8458445 [details] [diff] [review]
in-tree-channel

https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g32_v2_0/rev/e5db66301250

	Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Comment 26 • 10 years ago

Comment on attachment 8458443 [details] [diff] [review]
in-tree-l10n

https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g32_v2_0/rev/bcd1e9db532a

	Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Comment 27 • 10 years ago

Comment on attachment 8458447 [details] [diff] [review]
bump_bb-c_versions

http://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/rev/ea1dd17b4a35

	Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Comment 28 • 10 years ago

Comment on attachment 8458921 [details] [diff] [review]
disable_dolphin

http://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/rev/3d0e0896b4e2

	Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Comment 29 • 10 years ago

In production.

	Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Comment 30 • 10 years ago

Er,
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1017923#c32

	Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Comment 31 • 10 years ago

https://wiki.mozilla.org/ReleaseEngineering/Merge_Duty/Steps#Push_to_mozilla-b2gXX_vX_X_.3F

	Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Comment 32 • 10 years ago

dev-b2g:
As of today's uplift, the Gecko side of B2G v2.0 now lives on the
mozilla-b2g32_v2_0 branch, *NOT* mozilla-aurora. Patches that are
blocking-b2g:2.0+ should be landed there now. For more information, see
the page below which always contains the latest information.
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Release_Management/B2G_Landing#v2.0.0

As a reminder, B2G v2.1 development remains on mozilla-central through
the duration of the Gecko 34 development cycle due to end on Sept 1, so
there is no change for where v2.1 patches are to land.

	Aki Sasaki (not active) Assignee
	Comment 34 • 10 years ago

http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g32_v2_0/rev/00f4b3a7046f
https://wiki.mozilla.org/index.php?title=ReleaseEngineering/Merge_Duty/Steps&diff=998816&oldid=998812