Closed
Bug 11355
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
very slow in mousing over link
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: karnaze, Assigned: shaver)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: perf)
Mousing over the links "home", "screen saver", etc. is extremely slow and visually unappealing. One of the problems is that nsTableOuterFrame::Paint is being called about 8 times just by moving the mouse over a link. Tables are not being reflowed during mouse over. This was discovered in bug 8950 (see attachments there if necessary).
I don't know why this bug is assigned to me. If you look at the source you'll see that on mouse over and mouse out the script changes the image src URL. That causes the image frame code to invalidate its bounds and hence there's a repaint, once on mouse over and once on mouse out. Because we do painting in three passes (ask Kipp about this), you'll see a bunch of calls to the outer table (at least six I would expect) because the image that's changing is inside of the table and painting is a recursive process I would guess that the table painting code isn't very optimized, or the painting pipeline in general isn't optimized. Neither of these issues are me, though.
Reporter | ||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Assignee: karnaze → rickg
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•25 years ago
|
||
Rick, please don't give this back to me. I put print statements (I couldn't find my reliable timer) upon entering and leaving nsTableOuterFrame::Paint and got the impression that it was not too slow, but being called too many times. It might even have to do with (the style system) looking up visited links.
Chris -- not so fast. You own the table code, so the buck stops with you on making sure it gets fixed. I suggest you get peter and troy (and kipp) on the phone and work this out.
Reporter | ||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Assignee: karnaze → peterl
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•25 years ago
|
||
I copied the source of the url locally and put <base href=... in the head and the performance was acceptable. And the same large number of calls were being made to nsOuterTableFrame::Paint. Peter, if this is not related to the style system, could it be Necko related. If so, please reassign to Gagan.
Updated•25 years ago
|
Assignee: peterl → karnaze
Comment 5•25 years ago
|
||
The only result of style system interaction is a single call to AttributeChanged on the image frame, which in turn does nothing but invalidate the frame (no network involvement since the images in question are already loaded). Frankly I don't see any performance problem here, but the only possible culprit could be paint code.
Reporter | ||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: M12
Reporter | ||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Assignee: karnaze → vidur
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Target Milestone: M12 → M11
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•25 years ago
|
||
Vidur, I recently tried this page and when mousing over the links (HOME, SCREEN SAVERS, etc) I get the following error. Nav4.6 doesn't have a problem with the javascript. Please reassign back to me when this is fixed. JavaScript error: imgOff is not defined
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
Preliminary: as with any live website, what was served today is not necessarily what was served yesterday, so these comments may have little or nothing to do with what was previously observed. Communicator 4.7 and Mozilla M11 build 1999101109 both loaded this page in ~60 seconds the first time, ~40 seconds the second time, on an NT box with a Pentium 75 and a 28.8 modem. However, after apparently drawing the entire page and greying out the Stop button, Mozilla seemed to continue receiving data for at least several minutes, to no effect and for no apparent reason. The data flow could clearly be seen on an external modem, much more Rx than Tx, and no, nothing else was running. I wish I could say for sure what was being received, but it was almost certainly being received by Mozilla, as the data flow continued for ~10 seconds after clicking on the Back button, before the previous page began to load. Trying the mouseover, with Moz M11 no second image was displayed for any of the navigation buttons, but as the mouse pointer left the region, a blank white rectangle with the "image loading" icon (not the "broken image" icon) was momentarily displayed for all of the mouseover regions. Nav 4.7 took ~3 times as long to display the second image for the mouseover regions as for two other comparably complex pages. Speculation: I can't comment on the quality of the javascript code on this page, but could the fact that there are TWO distinct <SCRIPT LANGUAGE = "JavaScript"> elements on the page have anything to do with this? Speculation: while it is believable that Mozilla's javascript code still has some bugs in it, it is also believable that the page's javascript script has bugs in it also, even if Nav 4.x can display the page as intended. Regardless, the continued network activity is problematic. Question: could this have been the cause of the mouseover problem all along, or could this page triggering be triggering TWO bugs in Mozilla?
Updated•25 years ago
|
Target Milestone: M11 → M13
Comment 8•25 years ago
|
||
Moving to M13.
Comment 9•25 years ago
|
||
http://www.dilbert.com/ has a similar problem, but the mouseovers are intermitantly fast and slow (P3 450). The network problem is still present though. Build ID: 1999111520 WinNT 4 SP 6.
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
Sorry, that should have been the network problem is NOT present.
Comment 11•25 years ago
|
||
Is this bug related to bug 7550?
Comment 12•25 years ago
|
||
In an attempt to get my bug list in order again, marking all the bugs I have currently as ASSIGNED.
Comment 13•25 years ago
|
||
Related to 20110, though it seems that in this case we're actually reloading the images everytime.
Updated•25 years ago
|
Assignee: vidur → shaver
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Comment 14•25 years ago
|
||
And since I'm in a reassigning mood, I'll pass this one along with bug 20110 to shaver.
Comment 15•25 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 23441 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Updated•25 years ago
|
Keywords: perf
Summary: [PERF] very slow in mousing over link → very slow in mousing over link
Assignee | ||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: M13 → M14
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•25 years ago
|
||
I think 21879 will help us here, and maybe the new timer work.
Comment 17•25 years ago
|
||
Looks like this is mine. This happens because when you move over a link the status text resizes causing a reflow. It mistakenly relows the content area and the table as well. Its currently fixed in my build. I'll mark it fixed when I get it checked in. -E
Assignee: shaver → evaughan
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Whiteboard: Fixed will checkin soon
Comment 18•25 years ago
|
||
Opps I was wrong this is a table thing. The images changes in the table.
Assignee: evaughan → shaver
Whiteboard: Fixed will checkin soon
Comment 19•25 years ago
|
||
How come this is still M14? M14 is already out!
Comment 21•24 years ago
|
||
Tested with Build # 2000060408 on Win 98 SE Fixing bug 21879 seems to have fixed this bug. All mouseovers respond correctally. Works for me.
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•24 years ago
|
||
Can we get some feedback on other platforms, ideally from the reporter?
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 23•24 years ago
|
||
Tested with Build 2000060815 on Red Hat 6.2 Works in Linux
Comment 24•24 years ago
|
||
Testing on an old Pentium 75 box running WinNT, Mozilla 2000-06-13-08-M17 diplayed the mouseovers correctly, about a factor of two slower than NN 4.7. NN 4.7 displays the rollover images on the screensaver page just fast enough to not feel any more sluggish than anything else on that machine, while Mozilla M17 is just slow enough for the sluggishness to be annoying. Same basic result on a K6-300 machine: although much faster, Mozilla's rollover display still felt a bit sluggish compared to other mouseover effects in Mozilla and other apps. No unappealing transient visual effects, though. Same result for both the original URL and the Dilbert page, although the rollovers on the the latter page are much faster in both browsers than those on the screensavers page. So it's no longer extreme, but there is still something of a performance problem...
Comment 25•24 years ago
|
||
M16 has been out for a while now, these bugs target milestones need to be updated.
Comment 26•24 years ago
|
||
what's going on with this bug, Mr. Shaver?
Assignee | ||
Comment 27•24 years ago
|
||
Depending on whether you see this bug as ``abysmally slow mouseover performance'' or just ``slower than 4.x mouseover performance'', it might or might not be closed. I'm going to go with the former, I think, because it's not clear that 4.x performance parity is a real goal for right now.
Assignee | ||
Comment 28•24 years ago
|
||
It seems like this might be related to our problems with loading images from the cache: we're seeing that rollovers are causing things to always be fetched from the network, bypassing the image, memory and disk caches. Copying some image experts for guidance (and bug-depends-on settings).
Comment 29•24 years ago
|
||
Is this still a problem with the latest nightlies?
Comment 30•24 years ago
|
||
Milestone 0.8 has been released. We should either resolve this bug or update its milestone.
Comment 31•24 years ago
|
||
Under a Mandrake 7.2 system (P2 433, 128M ram, voodoo5, latest patches) the Mozilla .8 mouseover behavior is *extremely* slow on a JScript that is otherwise extremely fast on every other browser and platform on earth. The source code and example page I used is http://www.simplythebest.net/info/dhtmscript24.html. I really and truly suspect that this is still a bug in Mozilla's code that has not been fixed in subsequent builds.
Updated•24 years ago
|
Target Milestone: M16 → ---
Reporter | ||
Comment 32•24 years ago
|
||
peterson, can you verify that this is still a problem on Win32?
Comment 33•24 years ago
|
||
All testcases listed here seems to work pretty well now. Bug #20110 seems to be this same, and its fixed lately, suggest closing this too. Tested on linux build 2001042021.
Comment 34•23 years ago
|
||
Very fast for me, too. Marking worksforme.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•