Closed Bug 1167132 Opened 10 years ago Closed 9 years ago

[NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface

Categories

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: RIL, defect)

ARM
Gonk (Firefox OS)
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(feature-b2g:2.5+, tracking-b2g:backlog, firefox42 fixed)

RESOLVED FIXED
feature-b2g 2.5+
tracking-b2g backlog
Tracking Status
firefox42 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: jessica, Assigned: jessica)

References

Details

Attachments

(15 files, 35 obsolete files)

(deleted), patch
jessica
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
(deleted), patch
edgar
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
(deleted), patch
jessica
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
(deleted), patch
jessica
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
(deleted), patch
jessica
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
(deleted), patch
jessica
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
(deleted), patch
jessica
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
(deleted), patch
jessica
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
(deleted), patch
jessica
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
(deleted), patch
jessica
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
(deleted), patch
jessica
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
(deleted), patch
jessica
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
(deleted), patch
jessica
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
(deleted), patch
jessica
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
(deleted), patch
jessica
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
We will move network information needed by other modules into a separate interface, say nsINetworkInfo, so we'll need to expose only this interface and not the entire nsINetworkInterface.
Assignee: nobody → jjong
Attached patch Part 1: interface changes, v1. (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Comment on attachment 8609217 [details] [diff] [review] Part 1: interface changes, v1. Edgar, may I have your feedback on the interface changes? Thanks.
Attachment #8609217 - Flags: feedback?(echen)
(In reply to Jessica Jong [:jjong] [:jessica] from comment #2) > Comment on attachment 8609217 [details] [diff] [review] > Part 1: interface changes, v1. > > Edgar, may I have your feedback on the interface changes? Thanks. While modifying the changes needed in other modules, I realized we may need to change addHostRoute()/removeHostRoute() APIs not to take nsINetworkInterface as parameter, cause 'network-connection-state-changed' event is fired with nsINetworkInfo and not nsINetworkInterface now. How about just using Ci.nsINetworkInfo.NETWORK_TYPE_* as parameter?
(In reply to Jessica Jong [:jjong] [:jessica] from comment #3) > (In reply to Jessica Jong [:jjong] [:jessica] from comment #2) > > Comment on attachment 8609217 [details] [diff] [review] > > Part 1: interface changes, v1. > > > > Edgar, may I have your feedback on the interface changes? Thanks. > > While modifying the changes needed in other modules, I realized we may need > to change addHostRoute()/removeHostRoute() APIs not to take > nsINetworkInterface as parameter, cause 'network-connection-state-changed' > event is fired with nsINetworkInfo and not nsINetworkInterface now. How > about just using Ci.nsINetworkInfo.NETWORK_TYPE_* as parameter? Taking only Ci.nsINetworkInfo.NETWORK_TYPE_* as parameter probably isn't enough. For mobile connection, we use serviceId to distinguish different sim slot.
(In reply to Edgar Chen [:edgar][:echen] from comment #4) > (In reply to Jessica Jong [:jjong] [:jessica] from comment #3) > > (In reply to Jessica Jong [:jjong] [:jessica] from comment #2) > > > Comment on attachment 8609217 [details] [diff] [review] > > > Part 1: interface changes, v1. > > > > > > Edgar, may I have your feedback on the interface changes? Thanks. > > > > While modifying the changes needed in other modules, I realized we may need > > to change addHostRoute()/removeHostRoute() APIs not to take > > nsINetworkInterface as parameter, cause 'network-connection-state-changed' > > event is fired with nsINetworkInfo and not nsINetworkInterface now. How > > about just using Ci.nsINetworkInfo.NETWORK_TYPE_* as parameter? > > Taking only Ci.nsINetworkInfo.NETWORK_TYPE_* as parameter probably isn't > enough. For mobile connection, we use serviceId to distinguish different sim > slot. Oh, you're right. So, I guess we should use nsINetworkInfo as parameter for addHostRoute()/removeHostRoute()?
(In reply to Jessica Jong [:jjong] [:jessica] from comment #5) > Oh, you're right. So, I guess we should use nsINetworkInfo as parameter for > addHostRoute()/removeHostRoute()? Yes. There seems no other better idea.
Attached patch Part 1: interface changes, v2. (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Added changes for addHostRoute()/removeHostRoute().
Attachment #8609217 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8609217 - Flags: feedback?(echen)
Attachment #8610418 - Flags: feedback?(echen)
Comment on attachment 8610418 [details] [diff] [review] Part 1: interface changes, v2. Review of attachment 8610418 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Looks good, thank you. ::: dom/system/gonk/nsIDataCallManager.idl @@ +7,2 @@ > > +interface nsINetworkInfo; Don't need this forward declaration.
Attachment #8610418 - Flags: feedback?(echen) → feedback+
[Tracking Requested - why for this release]:
Bug 1167132 - Part 1: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (idl). r=echen
Attachment #8620764 - Flags: review?(echen)
Bug 1167132 - Part 2: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (NetworkManager)
Attachment #8620766 - Flags: review?(echen)
Bug 1167132 - Part 3: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (Wifi)
Attachment #8620767 - Flags: review?(hchang)
Bug 1167132 - Part 4: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (DataCall)
Attachment #8620768 - Flags: review?(echen)
Bug 1167132 - Part 5: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (Tethering)
Bug 1167132 - Part 6: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (RadioInterface)
Bug 1167132 - Part 7: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (MobileConnectionService)
Bug 1167132 - Part 8: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (MmsService)
Bug 1167132 - Part 9: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (shell)
Bug 1167132 - Part 10: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (PushService)
Bug 1167132 - Part 11: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (Gps)
Bug 1167132 - Part 12: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (NetStatistics)
Bug 1167132 - Part 13: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (discovery)
Bug 1167132 - Part 14: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (NetworkStats)
Bug 1167132 - Part 15: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (Mtransport)
Comment on attachment 8620779 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 15: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (Mtransport) Bug 1167132 - Part 15: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (Mtransport)
Attachment #8620764 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8620764 - Flags: review?(echen)
Attachment #8620766 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8620766 - Flags: review?(echen)
Attachment #8620767 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8620767 - Flags: review?(hchang)
Attachment #8620768 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8620768 - Flags: review?(echen)
Attachment #8620769 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8620770 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8620771 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8620772 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8620773 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8620774 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8620775 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8620776 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8620777 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8620778 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Ufff, first time using mozreview. I am not sure why my patches were obsoleted automatically, I'll ask for review again. Sorry if you are getting lots of notifications.
Comment on attachment 8620764 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 1: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (idl). r?echen Edgar, may I have your review on this? Thanks.
Attachment #8620764 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Attachment #8620764 - Flags: review?(echen)
Attachment #8620766 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Attachment #8620766 - Flags: review?(echen)
Comment on attachment 8620764 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 1: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (idl). r?echen Bug 1167132 - Part 1: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (idl). r?echen
Attachment #8620764 - Attachment description: MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 1: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (idl). r=echen → MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 1: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (idl). r?echen
Comment on attachment 8620766 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 2: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (NetworkManager) Bug 1167132 - Part 2: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (NetworkManager)
Attachment #8620767 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Attachment #8620767 - Flags: review?(hchang)
Comment on attachment 8620767 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 3: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (Wifi) Bug 1167132 - Part 3: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (Wifi)
Attachment #8620768 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Attachment #8620768 - Flags: review?(echen)
Comment on attachment 8620768 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 4: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (DataCall) Bug 1167132 - Part 4: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (DataCall)
Comment on attachment 8620769 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 5: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (Tethering) Bug 1167132 - Part 5: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (Tethering)
Attachment #8620769 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Comment on attachment 8620770 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 6: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (RadioInterface) Bug 1167132 - Part 6: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (RadioInterface)
Attachment #8620770 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Comment on attachment 8620771 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 7: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (MobileConnectionService) Bug 1167132 - Part 7: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (MobileConnectionService)
Attachment #8620771 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Comment on attachment 8620772 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 8: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (MmsService) Bug 1167132 - Part 8: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (MmsService)
Attachment #8620772 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Comment on attachment 8620773 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 9: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (shell) Bug 1167132 - Part 9: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (shell)
Attachment #8620773 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Comment on attachment 8620774 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 10: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (PushService) Bug 1167132 - Part 10: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (PushService)
Attachment #8620774 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Comment on attachment 8620775 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 11: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (Gps) Bug 1167132 - Part 11: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (Gps)
Attachment #8620775 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Attachment #8620776 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Comment on attachment 8620776 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 12: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (NetStatistics) Bug 1167132 - Part 12: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (NetStatistics)
Comment on attachment 8620777 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 13: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (discovery) Bug 1167132 - Part 13: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (discovery)
Attachment #8620777 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Comment on attachment 8620778 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 14: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (NetworkStats) Bug 1167132 - Part 14: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (NetworkStats)
Attachment #8620778 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Comment on attachment 8620779 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 15: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (Mtransport) Bug 1167132 - Part 15: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (Mtransport)
Attachment #8620764 - Flags: review?(echen) → review+
Comment on attachment 8620764 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 1: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (idl). r?echen https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/10827/#review9825 Looks good.
Comment on attachment 8620768 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 4: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (DataCall) https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/10833/#review10819 Please see my comments, thank you. ::: dom/system/gonk/DataCallManager.js:1450 (Diff revision 2) > - let reason = Ci.nsINetworkInterface.DATACALL_DEACTIVATE_NO_REASON; > + let reason = Ci.nsIDataCallInterface.DATACALL_DEACTIVATE_NO_REASON; Nice catch!! ::: dom/system/gonk/DataCallManager.js:1659 (Diff revision 2) > return this.state == NETWORK_STATE_CONNECTED; ```this.state == NETWORK_STATE_CONNECTED;``` ::: dom/system/gonk/DataCallManager.js:841 (Diff revision 2) > - let dataCall = networkInterface.dataCall; > + let dataCall = networkInterface.info.dataCall; Should this be? ``` let dataCall = networkInterface.dataCall; ```
Attachment #8620768 - Flags: review?(echen)
Comment on attachment 8620767 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 3: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (Wifi) Looks good to me! Sorry for late review :p
Attachment #8620767 - Flags: review?(hchang) → review+
Comment on attachment 8620766 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1167132 - Part 2: [NetworkManager] move network information into a separate interface (NetworkManager) https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/10829/#review10053 Mostly looks good, just few comments. And I would like to review it again since there are a lot of changes in this part. :) ::: dom/system/gonk/NetworkManager.js:262 (Diff revision 2) > - getNetworkId: function(network) { > + getNetworkId: function(networkInfo) { s/networkInfo/aNetworkInfo/ ::: dom/system/gonk/NetworkManager.js:553 (Diff revision 2) > - isValidatedNetwork: function(network) { > + isValidatedNetwork: function(networkInfo) { s/networkInfo/aNetworkInfo/ ::: dom/system/gonk/NetworkManager.js:891 (Diff revision 2) > - convertConnectionType: function(network) { > + convertConnectionType: function(aNetwork) { s/aNetwork/aNetworkInfo/ ::: dom/system/gonk/NetworkManager.js:793 (Diff revision 2) > this.active = null; `active` now caches the networkInfo of active network, how about having a clearer naming, maybe `activeNetworkInfo`?
Attachment #8620766 - Flags: review?(echen)
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/10829/#review10053 > `active` now caches the networkInfo of active network, how about having a clearer naming, maybe `activeNetworkInfo`? `activeNetworkInfo` will definitely be clearer, I was just worried we would be changing too much other module's code since this is exposed in the interface. But I agree with you. :)
Attached patch Part 1: interface changes, v4. (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Hi Edgar, I have changed 'active' to 'activeNetworkInfo', may I have you review again? Thanks.
Attachment #8610418 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8620764 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8630852 - Flags: review?(echen)
Attached patch Part 2: NetworkManager changes, v2. (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Addressed review comment 46.
Attachment #8620766 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8630911 - Flags: review?(echen)
Attached patch Part 3: wifi changes. r=hchang (deleted) — Splinter Review
Attachment #8620767 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8630913 - Flags: review+
Attached patch Part 4: data call changes, v2. (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Addressed review comment 44. Edgar, may I have your review again? Thanks.
Attachment #8620768 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8630915 - Flags: review?(echen)
Attached patch Part 5: tethering changes, v1. (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Attachment #8620769 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8630916 - Flags: review?(echen)
Attached patch Part 6: RadioInterface changes, v1. (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Attachment #8620770 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8630917 - Flags: review?(echen)
Attached patch Part 7: MobileConnection changes, v1. (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Attachment #8620771 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8630918 - Flags: review?(echen)
Attachment #8630852 - Flags: review?(echen) → review+
Comment on attachment 8630911 [details] [diff] [review] Part 2: NetworkManager changes, v2. Review of attachment 8630911 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Nice, thank you. ::: dom/system/gonk/NetworkManager.js @@ -492,5 @@ > } > this._preferredNetworkType = val; > }, > > - active: null, Nit: Put `_activeNetwork: null,` here (follow same style as _preferredNetworkType).
Attachment #8630911 - Flags: review?(echen) → review+
Comment on attachment 8630915 [details] [diff] [review] Part 4: data call changes, v2. Review of attachment 8630915 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: dom/system/gonk/DataCallManager.js @@ +415,5 @@ > this.dataNetworkInterfaces.clear(); > this._dataCalls = []; > this.clientId = null; > > + this.dataCallInterface.unregisterListener(this); Nice catch!!! :)
Attachment #8630915 - Flags: review?(echen) → review+
Comment on attachment 8630916 [details] [diff] [review] Part 5: tethering changes, v1. Review of attachment 8630916 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: dom/system/gonk/TetheringService.js @@ +631,5 @@ > return; > } > > + this._tetheringInterface[TETHERING_TYPE_WIFI].internalInterface = > + aNetwork.info.name; It seems that `setWifiTethering` needs interface name only. Maybe we don't have to take nsINetworkInterface as argument [1], unless we might need more information from nsINetworkInterface in the future. Just share my thought here, we could do further discussion for this. [1] https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/dom/system/gonk/nsITetheringService.idl#13-29
Attachment #8630916 - Flags: review?(echen) → review+
Comment on attachment 8630917 [details] [diff] [review] Part 6: RadioInterface changes, v1. Review of attachment 8630917 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: dom/system/gonk/RadioInterfaceLayer.js @@ -80,5 @@ > -const NETWORK_TYPE_MOBILE = Ci.nsINetworkInterface.NETWORK_TYPE_MOBILE; > -const NETWORK_TYPE_MOBILE_MMS = Ci.nsINetworkInterface.NETWORK_TYPE_MOBILE_MMS; > -const NETWORK_TYPE_MOBILE_SUPL = Ci.nsINetworkInterface.NETWORK_TYPE_MOBILE_SUPL; > -const NETWORK_TYPE_MOBILE_IMS = Ci.nsINetworkInterface.NETWORK_TYPE_MOBILE_IMS; > -const NETWORK_TYPE_MOBILE_DUN = Ci.nsINetworkInterface.NETWORK_TYPE_MOBILE_DUN; NETWORK_TYPE_MOBILE_* are unused consts, it seem we could remove them.
Attachment #8630917 - Flags: review?(echen) → review+
Comment on attachment 8630918 [details] [diff] [review] Part 7: MobileConnection changes, v1. Review of attachment 8630918 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: dom/mobileconnection/gonk/MobileConnectionService.js @@ +1606,1 @@ > this.notifyDataError(rilNetwork.serviceId, rilNetwork); Ah, I found a flaw existing in the code base for a while: the second argument of notifyDataError should be error message [1], not NetworkInterface or NetworkInfo. [1] https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/dom/mobileconnection/gonk/MobileConnectionService.js?from=MobileConnectionService.js#1378-1385
Attachment #8630918 - Flags: review?(echen)
(In reply to Edgar Chen [:edgar][:echen] from comment #59) > Comment on attachment 8630918 [details] [diff] [review] > Part 7: MobileConnection changes, v1. > > Review of attachment 8630918 [details] [diff] [review]: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > ::: dom/mobileconnection/gonk/MobileConnectionService.js > @@ +1606,1 @@ > > this.notifyDataError(rilNetwork.serviceId, rilNetwork); > > Ah, I found a flaw existing in the code base for a while: the second > argument of notifyDataError should be error message [1], not > NetworkInterface or NetworkInfo. > > [1] > https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/dom/mobileconnection/gonk/ > MobileConnectionService.js?from=MobileConnectionService.js#1378-1385 Right! thanks for catching this, will fix it in the next version.
(In reply to Edgar Chen [:edgar][:echen] from comment #57) > Comment on attachment 8630916 [details] [diff] [review] > Part 5: tethering changes, v1. > > Review of attachment 8630916 [details] [diff] [review]: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > ::: dom/system/gonk/TetheringService.js > @@ +631,5 @@ > > return; > > } > > > > + this._tetheringInterface[TETHERING_TYPE_WIFI].internalInterface = > > + aNetwork.info.name; > > It seems that `setWifiTethering` needs interface name only. Maybe we don't > have to take nsINetworkInterface as argument [1], unless we might need more > information from nsINetworkInterface in the future. Just share my thought > here, we could do further discussion for this. > > [1] > https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/dom/system/gonk/ > nsITetheringService.idl#13-29 I agree, passing network interface name is enough. It's a good opportunity to fix this, will upload a new patch revising this. Thanks.
Attached patch Part 2: NetworkManager changes, v3. (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Addressed nit in review comment 55.
Attachment #8630911 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8637615 - Flags: review+
Attached patch Part 4: data call changes, v3. (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Some more fixes in DataCallManager.js
Attachment #8630915 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8637616 - Flags: review+
Attached patch Part 5: tethering changes, v2. (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Use interfaceName as parameter (instead of network interface) for setWifiTethering().
Attachment #8630916 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8637617 - Flags: review?(echen)
Attached patch Part 6: RadioInterface changes, v2. (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Removed unused consts, as mentioned in comment 58.
Attachment #8630917 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8637618 - Flags: review+
Pass error message when calling notifyDataError().
Attachment #8630918 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8637620 - Flags: review?(echen)
Comment on attachment 8637620 [details] [diff] [review] Part 7: MobileConnection changes. r=echen Review of attachment 8637620 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: dom/system/gonk/DataCallManager.js @@ +840,5 @@ > if (networkInterface && networkInterface.enabled) { > let dataCall = networkInterface.dataCall; > + if (this._compareDataCallOptions(dataCall, aDataCall)) { > + Services.obs.notifyObservers(networkInterface.info, > + TOPIC_DATA_CALL_ERROR, aErrorMsg); I removed the part where we compare cid, cause this is called only on data call setup error.
Attached patch Part 8: mms changes, v1. (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Bevis, we are exposing nsINetworkInfo instead of nsINetworkInterface now. I have made the changes in mms, would you mind reviewing this? Thanks.
Attachment #8620772 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8637627 - Flags: review?(btseng)
Attached patch Part 9: shell changes, v1. (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Fabrice, we are exposing nsINetworkInfo instead of nsINetworkInterface in 'network-connection-state-changed' events. I've made the corresponding changes in shell.js, would you mind review this? Thanks.
Attachment #8620773 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8637632 - Flags: review?(fabrice)
Attached patch Part 10: push changes, v1. (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Hi :nsm, we are exposing nsINetworkInfo (.activeNetworkInfo) instead of nsINetworkInterface (.active) in NetworkManager. I've made the corresponding changes in Push modules, would you mind reviewing this? Thanks.
Attachment #8620774 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8637637 - Flags: review?(nsm.nikhil)
Attached patch Part 11: gps changes, v1. (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Hi Kanru, we are exposing nsINetworkInfo instead of nsINetworkInterface in NetworkManager. I've made the corresponding changes in gps, would you mind review this? Thanks.
Attachment #8620775 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8637646 - Flags: review?(kchen)
Comment on attachment 8637615 [details] [diff] [review] Part 2: NetworkManager changes, v3. Review of attachment 8637615 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: dom/system/gonk/NetworkManager.js @@ +573,3 @@ > } > > + return this.resolveHostname(networkInfo, host) nit: The signature of resolveHostname is still unchanged and take "network" as 1st parameter. :p
Comment on attachment 8637627 [details] [diff] [review] Part 8: mms changes, v1. Review of attachment 8637627 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- r=me after the inlined comment addressed. Thanks! ::: dom/mobilemessage/gonk/MmsService.js @@ +522,5 @@ > return; > } > > // Check if the network state change belongs to this service. > + let network = subject.QueryInterface(Ci.nsIRilNetworkInfo); nit: please replace "network" as "networkInfo" as well for better understanding.
Attachment #8637627 - Flags: review?(btseng) → review+
(In reply to Bevis Tseng[:bevistseng][:btseng] from comment #72) > Comment on attachment 8637615 [details] [diff] [review] > Part 2: NetworkManager changes, v3. > > Review of attachment 8637615 [details] [diff] [review]: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > ::: dom/system/gonk/NetworkManager.js > @@ +573,3 @@ > > } > > > > + return this.resolveHostname(networkInfo, host) > > nit: The signature of resolveHostname is still unchanged and take "network" > as 1st parameter. :p Will do! (In reply to Bevis Tseng[:bevistseng][:btseng] from comment #73) > Comment on attachment 8637627 [details] [diff] [review] > Part 8: mms changes, v1. > > Review of attachment 8637627 [details] [diff] [review]: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > r=me after the inlined comment addressed. > > Thanks! > > ::: dom/mobilemessage/gonk/MmsService.js > @@ +522,5 @@ > > return; > > } > > > > // Check if the network state change belongs to this service. > > + let network = subject.QueryInterface(Ci.nsIRilNetworkInfo); > > nit: please replace "network" as "networkInfo" as well for better > understanding. Will do. Thanks Bevis!
Attached patch Part 12: discovery changes, v1. (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Hi jryans, we are exposing nsINetworkInfo instead of nsINetworkInterface in NetworkManager. I've made the corresponding changes in discovery, would you mind review this? Thanks.
Attachment #8620776 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8637731 - Flags: review?(jryans)
Attached patch Part 13: necko/netstats changes, v1. (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Hi Ethan, we are exposing nsINetworkInfo instead of nsINetworkInterface in NetworkManager. I've made the corresponding changes in necko/netstats, would you mind review this? Thanks.
Attachment #8620777 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8637733 - Flags: review?(ettseng)
Attached patch Part 14: netstats changes, v1. (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Ethan, would mind reviewing this too? Thanks.
Attachment #8620778 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8637734 - Flags: review?(ettseng)
Attached patch Part 15: NetworkInterfaceList changes, v1. (obsolete) (deleted) — Splinter Review
Edgar, here are the changes for NetworkInterfaceListService, would you mind reviewing this? Thanks.
Attachment #8620779 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8637735 - Flags: review?(echen)
Comment on attachment 8637646 [details] [diff] [review] Part 11: gps changes, v1. Review of attachment 8637646 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- LGTM
Attachment #8637646 - Flags: review?(kchen) → review+
Comment on attachment 8637617 [details] [diff] [review] Part 5: tethering changes, v2. Review of attachment 8637617 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- r=me with comment addressed, thank you. ::: dom/system/gonk/nsITetheringService.idl @@ +16,5 @@ > * @param enabled > * Boolean that indicates whether tethering should be enabled (true) or > * disabled (false). > + * @param interfaceName > + * The Wifi network interface name for external interface. s/external/internal/
Attachment #8637617 - Flags: review?(echen) → review+
Attachment #8637620 - Flags: review?(echen) → review+
Comment on attachment 8637733 [details] [diff] [review] Part 13: necko/netstats changes, v1. Review of attachment 8637733 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- This patch simply replaces nsINetworkInterface by nsINetworkInfo. It looks pretty good. Thanks Jessica! r=me. :)
Attachment #8637733 - Flags: review?(ettseng) → review+
Comment on attachment 8637734 [details] [diff] [review] Part 14: netstats changes, v1. Review of attachment 8637734 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- This patch also looks perfect to me! r=me.
Attachment #8637734 - Flags: review?(ettseng) → review+
it's within the 2.5 scope - As a user, I want to have a robust control in data connection.
feature-b2g: --- → 2.5+
Attachment #8637735 - Flags: review?(echen) → review+
Attachment #8637632 - Flags: review?(fabrice) → review+
rebased.
Attachment #8630852 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8640367 - Flags: review+
Rebased and renamed the first parameter of resolveHostname to aNetworkInfo.
Attachment #8637615 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8640369 - Flags: review+
rebased.
Attachment #8637616 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8640372 - Flags: review+
Correct comment in nsITetheringService.idl as comment 80.
Attachment #8637617 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8640373 - Flags: review+
rebased.
Attachment #8637618 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8640375 - Flags: review+
Attachment #8637620 - Attachment description: Part 7: MobileConnection changes, v2. → Part 7: MobileConnection changes. r=echen
Attached patch Part 8: mms changes. r=btseng (deleted) — Splinter Review
Use variable name "networkInfo" instead of "network" for better understanding.
Attachment #8637627 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8640376 - Flags: review+
Add r=fabrice.
Attachment #8637632 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8640378 - Flags: review+
Attached patch Part 10: push changes. r=nsm (deleted) — Splinter Review
Add r=nsm.
Attachment #8637637 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8640379 - Flags: review+
Attached patch Part 11: gps changes. r=kanru (deleted) — Splinter Review
Add r=kanru.
Attachment #8637646 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8640380 - Flags: review+
Add r=jryans.
Attachment #8637731 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8640381 - Flags: review+
Add r=ethan.
Attachment #8637733 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8640383 - Flags: review+
Add r=ethan.
Attachment #8637734 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8640384 - Flags: review+
Rebased and add r=echen.
Attachment #8637735 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8640385 - Flags: review+
Wow, you got r+ for all parts of patches! Well done!
Thanks to all the reviewers! :) try looks good: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=202656ad4802
Keywords: checkin-needed
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Depends on: 1197667
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: