Closed Bug 1196047 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

Reorganize /devtools/shared subdirectories

Categories

(DevTools :: General, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(firefox44 fixed)

RESOLVED FIXED
Firefox 44
Tracking Status
firefox44 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: jryans, Assigned: jryans)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

Attachments

(7 files)

(deleted), text/x-review-board-request
jsantell
: review+
Details
(deleted), text/x-review-board-request
bgrins
: review+
Details
(deleted), text/x-review-board-request
bgrins
: review+
Details
(deleted), text/x-review-board-request
jsantell
: review+
Details
(deleted), text/x-review-board-request
jsantell
: review+
Details
(deleted), text/x-review-board-request
jsantell
: review+
Details
(deleted), text/x-review-board-request
bgrins
: review+
Details
After the large move in bug 912121, there will be a few things in /devtools/shared that need more specific tweaks: * /devtools/shared/shared: Most of these are server files, move them there * Other bits may be server specific as well
Assignee: nobody → jryans
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Bug 1196047 - Move system.js to devtools/shared. r=jsantell
Attachment #8671083 - Flags: review?(jsantell)
Bug 1196047 - Move indentation.js to devtools/shared. r=bgrins
Attachment #8671084 - Flags: review?(bgrinstead)
Bug 1196047 - Move async-storage.js to devtools/shared. r=bgrins
Attachment #8671085 - Flags: review?(bgrinstead)
Bug 1196047 - Move worker*.js to devtools/shared. r=jsantell
Attachment #8671086 - Flags: review?(jsantell)
Bug 1196047 - Move most of shared/performance to server/performance. r=jsantell
Attachment #8671087 - Flags: review?(jsantell)
Bug 1196047 - Move shared/shared perf files to server/performance. r=jsantell
Attachment #8671088 - Flags: review?(jsantell)
Bug 1196047 - Move tern to client/sourceeditor. r=bgrins
Attachment #8671089 - Flags: review?(bgrinstead)
Comment on attachment 8671083 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1196047 - Move system.js to devtools/shared. r=jsantell https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/21513/#review19391
Attachment #8671083 - Flags: review?(jsantell) → review+
Comment on attachment 8671086 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1196047 - Move worker*.js to devtools/shared. r=jsantell https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/21519/#review19393 I wonder if it'd be useful to nest all of these in devtools/shared/worker/*? Also, we should be able to do `devtools/shared/worker` and `devtools/shared/worker/other-worker-module` by using standard node resolution rules, if that helps at all
Attachment #8671086 - Flags: review?(jsantell) → review+
Comment on attachment 8671084 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1196047 - Move indentation.js to devtools/shared. r=bgrins https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/21515/#review19397 ::: devtools/shared/tests/unit/xpcshell.ini:14 (Diff revision 1) > +skip-if = toolkit == 'gonk' && debug # Bug 1206586 Don't think this is needed. I see skip-if = toolkit == 'android' || toolkit == 'gonk' at the top of the xpcshell.ini file here
Attachment #8671084 - Flags: review?(bgrinstead) → review+
Comment on attachment 8671085 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1196047 - Move async-storage.js to devtools/shared. r=bgrins https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/21517/#review19399
Attachment #8671085 - Flags: review?(bgrinstead) → review+
Attachment #8671089 - Flags: review?(bgrinstead) → review+
Comment on attachment 8671089 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1196047 - Move tern to client/sourceeditor. r=bgrins https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/21525/#review19401 ::: devtools/client/sourceeditor/tern/tests/unit/test_import_tern.js:9 (Diff revision 1) > - const tern = require("tern/tern"); > + debugger; Remove extra debugger statement ::: devtools/client/sourceeditor/tern/tests/unit/xpcshell.ini:5 (Diff revision 1) > -skip-if = toolkit == 'android' || toolkit == 'gonk' > +firefox-appdir = browser Are the skip-if's meant to be removed here?
Comment on attachment 8671087 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1196047 - Move most of shared/performance to client or server. r=jsantell https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/21521/#review19395 Lots of notes -- I don't think this'll work when debugging Gecko < 43 for the reasons below. If you have any questions or want me to do any moving, let me know! These modules are a mess. ::: devtools/server/performance/moz.build:8 (Diff revision 1) > + 'legacy', Legacy is exclusively on the client. We should move this entire directory to devtools/client/performance/legacy I think. ::: devtools/server/performance/moz.build:14 (Diff revision 1) > + 'recording-common.js', recording-common is used to decorate both Actor and Front for PerformanceRecording, as well as legacy Recordings -- so this should probably be shared then, yeah? ::: devtools/shared/performance/moz.build (Diff revision 1) > - 'io.js', io.js manages the importing/exporting of profile recordings -- meaning this should never be on the server as it is accessing the file system. Both legacy and performance actor style use this on the client. I don't believe there are any uses that are not on the client. ::: devtools/shared/performance/moz.build:11 (Diff revision 1) > - 'utils.js', > + 'utils.js', I *think* utils is only on the client, it mostly (entirely?) massages recording data (inflates profile, normalizes timing, etc). This could also live on the client (and renamed to recording-data.js)
Attachment #8671087 - Flags: review?(jsantell)
Attachment #8671088 - Flags: review?(jsantell) → review+
Comment on attachment 8671088 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1196047 - Move shared/shared perf files to server/performance. r=jsantell https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/21523/#review19407
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/21515/#review19397 > Don't think this is needed. I see skip-if = toolkit == 'android' || toolkit == 'gonk' at the top of the xpcshell.ini file here Okay, removed.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/21519/#review19393 If you mean `devtools/shared/worker` would resolve to `devtools/shared/worker/index.js`, it looks like that requires setting `isNative: true` on the loader, which DevTools Loader.jsm does not do currently. Filed bug 1213028 to explore it.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/21525/#review19401 > Remove extra debugger statement Thanks for catching that! > Are the skip-if's meant to be removed here? Yes, I removed them because they should be redundant: files in /devtools/client aren't shipped to those platforms, so these tests should never be run there either. I'll put it back if try gets mad.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/21519/#review19393 Okay, I've moved them all under `devtools/shared/worker/*`.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/21521/#review19395 As discussed on IRC, it should be fine for <43 since the client app (desktop Firefox) has to ship all 3 DevTools directories, mainly because fronts are usually in `server` with their actors. > Legacy is exclusively on the client. We should move this entire directory to devtools/client/performance/legacy I think. Okay, I see what you mean. It's lazily referenced from the actor file in `server`, but only ever actually loaded by the client app, so I'll move it to `client`. > recording-common is used to decorate both Actor and Front for PerformanceRecording, as well as legacy Recordings -- so this should probably be shared then, yeah? Now that legacy is in `client`, yes, it's split across. I'll move it back to shared. > io.js manages the importing/exporting of profile recordings -- meaning this should never be on the server as it is accessing the file system. Both legacy and performance actor style use this on the client. I don't believe there are any uses that are not on the client. You're right, it's lazily referenced from actor files, but only used in fronts. I'll move to `client`. > I *think* utils is only on the client, it mostly (entirely?) massages recording data (inflates profile, normalizes timing, etc). This could also live on the client (and renamed to recording-data.js) It's actually used on both client and server, as in[1]. I'll leave it in `shared`, but I'll rename to `recording-utils.js`, since you usually import it as `RecordingUtils`. [1]: https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/devtools/server/actors/performance-recording.js#141
Comment on attachment 8671083 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1196047 - Move system.js to devtools/shared. r=jsantell Bug 1196047 - Move system.js to devtools/shared. r=jsantell
Comment on attachment 8671084 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1196047 - Move indentation.js to devtools/shared. r=bgrins Bug 1196047 - Move indentation.js to devtools/shared. r=bgrins
Comment on attachment 8671085 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1196047 - Move async-storage.js to devtools/shared. r=bgrins Bug 1196047 - Move async-storage.js to devtools/shared. r=bgrins
Comment on attachment 8671086 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1196047 - Move worker*.js to devtools/shared. r=jsantell Bug 1196047 - Move worker*.js to devtools/shared. r=jsantell
Comment on attachment 8671087 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1196047 - Move most of shared/performance to client or server. r=jsantell Bug 1196047 - Move most of shared/performance to client or server. r=jsantell
Attachment #8671087 - Attachment description: MozReview Request: Bug 1196047 - Move most of shared/performance to server/performance. r=jsantell → MozReview Request: Bug 1196047 - Move most of shared/performance to client or server. r=jsantell
Attachment #8671087 - Flags: review?(jsantell)
Comment on attachment 8671088 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1196047 - Move shared/shared perf files to server/performance. r=jsantell Bug 1196047 - Move shared/shared perf files to server/performance. r=jsantell
Comment on attachment 8671089 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1196047 - Move tern to client/sourceeditor. r=bgrins Bug 1196047 - Move tern to client/sourceeditor. r=bgrins
Attachment #8671087 - Flags: review?(jsantell) → review+
Comment on attachment 8671087 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1196047 - Move most of shared/performance to client or server. r=jsantell https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/21521/#review19449 I think there's something up with the legacy actor tests (browser_perf-legacy-front-0*.js, 01, 02, 03), they are renamed to 07, 08, 09, removed from browser.ini, and looks like some other changes in the tests itself that will cause them to fail. R+ with those tests moved back to 01, 02, 03, and readded in browser.ini (and ensure the removal of other requires in those tests are intentional)
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/21521/#review19449 We discussed on IRC that I had moved the tests to client, and there were existing tests with the same name, so I re-numbered them. The test changes are because of different head files between the test directories.
Product: Firefox → DevTools
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: