Closed
Bug 1415391
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
followup fixes to bug 1412690 (fennec in-tree relpro)
Categories
(Release Engineering :: Release Automation: Other, enhancement)
Release Engineering
Release Automation: Other
Tracking
(firefox58 fixed)
RESOLVED
FIXED
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox58 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: mozilla, Assigned: mozilla)
References
Details
Attachments
(5 files, 1 obsolete file)
(deleted),
text/x-review-board-request
|
dustin
:
review+
|
Details |
(deleted),
text/x-review-board-request
|
dustin
:
review+
|
Details |
(deleted),
text/x-review-board-request
|
dustin
:
review+
|
Details |
(deleted),
text/x-review-board-request
|
dustin
:
review+
|
Details |
(deleted),
text/x-review-board-request
|
dustin
:
review+
|
Details |
Bug 1412690 landed before the change freeze, but before Dustin had a look. This bug is here to track addressing his comments.
Assignee | ||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → aki
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•7 years ago
|
||
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Assignee | ||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Attachment #8926230 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•7 years ago
|
||
Patch 1 of ? sent to mozreview. The only changes involve adding task.extra.index.rank to fennec release tasks.
I figured I could get this reviewed while we work on the other review comments from bug 1412690.
Comment 4•7 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8926239 [details]
bug 1415391 - move release indexes into index_builder('release').
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/197498/#review202922
Nice!
Attachment #8926239 -
Flags: review?(dustin) → review+
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•7 years ago
|
||
(Landed / reviewed / written):
_ x x release indexes
_ _ x beetmover-cdns worker-type
_ _ x bbb properties
_ _ _ NEXT_VERSION and BUILD_NUMBER parameters
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1412690#c55
_ _ _ product attribute (I'd like to also add shipping-phase or relpro-action or something, so we can filter tasks in the release promotion action target_tasks_methods more elegantly.)
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1412690#c59
_ _ _ rework notifications - this is a pretty large set of changes.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1412690#c56
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1412690#c58
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•7 years ago
|
||
The shipping-product / shipping-phase patch is in progress. It will change a lot of code while keeping the graph the same. It'll make including/excluding tasks in each action much simpler.
I'm open to work on notifications unless :garbas wants it. We could tackle bug 1412014 (disable notifications on completion) while we're at it, or leave that til later.
(Landed / reviewed / written):
_ x x release indexes
_ _ x beetmover-cdns worker-type
_ _ x bbb properties
_ _ x NEXT_VERSION and BUILD_NUMBER parameters
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1412690#c55
_ _ _ product attribute (I'd like to also add shipping-phase or relpro-action or something, so we can filter tasks in the release promotion action target_tasks_methods more elegantly.)
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1412690#c59
_ _ _ rework notifications - this is a pretty large set of changes.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1412690#c56
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1412690#c58
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•7 years ago
|
||
:garbas is going to work on notifications... we can split those into another bug.
:dustin - do you have time to review? I do know the 2nd patch is needed for Fennec 58.0b3 on Monday. I'll ping the firefox-ci email list.
I do want these changes on maple soon, since they reduce a lot of ugliness. If one or more of these patches are delayed, I can land there sooner for dev work.
(Landed / reviewed / written):
_ x x release indexes
_ _ x beetmover-cdns worker-type
_ _ x bbb properties
_ _ x NEXT_VERSION and BUILD_NUMBER parameters
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1412690#c55
_ _ x product attribute (I'd like to also add shipping-phase or relpro-action or something, so we can filter tasks in the release promotion action target_tasks_methods more elegantly.)
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1412690#c59
Flags: needinfo?(dustin)
Comment 13•7 years ago
|
||
Yeah, I've got about 20 reviews pending but I'll bump this one to the top of the list.
Flags: needinfo?(dustin)
Comment 14•7 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8926512 [details]
bug 1415391 - fix beetmover-cdns worker-type schema.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/197770/#review203748
Attachment #8926512 -
Flags: review?(dustin) → review+
Comment 15•7 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8926542 [details]
bug 1415391 - move bbb properties under worker:
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/197778/#review203750
::: taskcluster/taskgraph/transforms/task.py:1016
(Diff revision 1)
> +
> + if worker['properties'].get('tuxedo_server_url'):
> + resolve_keyed_by(
> + worker, 'properties.tuxedo_server_url', worker['buildername'],
> + **config.params
> + )
If it's useful this could call resolve_keyed_by on all properties, but at the moment this is the one that needs it :)
Attachment #8926542 -
Flags: review?(dustin) → review+
Comment 16•7 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8926639 [details]
bug 1415391 - parameterize next_version and build_number.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/197874/#review203752
Attachment #8926639 -
Flags: review?(dustin) → review+
Comment 17•7 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8927120 [details]
bug 1415391 - add `shipping_phase` and `shipping_product` attributes.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/198342/#review203754
::: taskcluster/taskgraph/transforms/beetmover_cdns.py:45
(Diff revision 1)
> Required('worker-type'): optionally_keyed_by('project', basestring),
> Optional('dependencies'): {basestring: taskref_or_string},
> Optional('index'): {basestring: basestring},
> Optional('routes'): [basestring],
> + Required('shipping-phase'): basestring,
> + Required('shipping-product'): basestring,
This could refer to `task_description_schema['shipping-xx']` so that it gets the Any(..) validation as early as possible in the transformation process.
::: taskcluster/taskgraph/transforms/push_apk.py:39
(Diff revision 1)
> Required('worker-type'): basestring,
> Required('worker'): object,
> Required('scopes'): None,
> Required('deadline-after'): basestring,
> + Required('shipping-phase'): basestring,
> + Required('shipping-product'): basestring,
same
::: taskcluster/taskgraph/transforms/push_apk_breakpoint.py:36
(Diff revision 1)
> Required('worker'): object,
> Required('treeherder'): object,
> Required('run-on-projects'): list,
> Required('deadline-after'): basestring,
> + Required('shipping-product'): basestring,
> + Required('shipping-phase'): basestring,
same
Attachment #8927120 -
Flags: review?(dustin) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Dustin J. Mitchell [:dustin] from comment #13)
> Yeah, I've got about 20 reviews pending but I'll bump this one to the top of
> the list.
Ouch. Thank you, and sorry for barging in.
(In reply to Dustin J. Mitchell [:dustin] from comment #17)
> Comment on attachment 8927120 [details]
> bug 1415391 - add `shipping_phase` and `shipping_product` attributes.
>
> https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/198342/#review203754
>
> ::: taskcluster/taskgraph/transforms/beetmover_cdns.py:45
> (Diff revision 1)
> > Required('worker-type'): optionally_keyed_by('project', basestring),
> > Optional('dependencies'): {basestring: taskref_or_string},
> > Optional('index'): {basestring: basestring},
> > Optional('routes'): [basestring],
> > + Required('shipping-phase'): basestring,
> > + Required('shipping-product'): basestring,
>
> This could refer to `task_description_schema['shipping-xx']` so that it gets
> the Any(..) validation as early as possible in the transformation process.
I decided not to, so we can't set a shipping-phase or shipping-product of None in this kind. I'll add a comment.
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment 24•7 years ago
|
||
Pushed by asasaki@mozilla.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/a6108f6cc6a1
move release indexes into index_builder('release'). r=dustin
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/136574f7a5e4
fix beetmover-cdns worker-type schema. r=dustin
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/0fd32f2a273f
move bbb properties under worker: r=dustin
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/598578e14b9f
parameterize next_version and build_number. r=dustin
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/7d4154fe9a26
add `shipping_phase` and `shipping_product` attributes. r=dustin
Assignee | ||
Comment 25•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Aki Sasaki [:aki] from comment #18)
> > ::: taskcluster/taskgraph/transforms/beetmover_cdns.py:45
> > (Diff revision 1)
> > > Required('worker-type'): optionally_keyed_by('project', basestring),
> > > Optional('dependencies'): {basestring: taskref_or_string},
> > > Optional('index'): {basestring: basestring},
> > > Optional('routes'): [basestring],
> > > + Required('shipping-phase'): basestring,
> > > + Required('shipping-product'): basestring,
> >
> > This could refer to `task_description_schema['shipping-xx']` so that it gets
> > the Any(..) validation as early as possible in the transformation process.
>
> I decided not to, so we can't set a shipping-phase or shipping-product of
> None in this kind. I'll add a comment.
I lied. I switched to task_description_schema; if we set these to None, the task just won't show up in the appropriate release promotion action.
Comment 26•7 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•