Jeff Muizelaar [:jrmuizel] Reporter
	Description • 7 years ago

http://browserbench.org/MotionMark/developer.html?test-interval=30&display=minimal&tiles=big&controller=ramp&frame-rate=50&kalman-process-error=1&kalman-measurement-error=4&time-measurement=performance&suite-name=HTMLsuite&test-name=CSSbouncingfiltercircles&complexity=92

I get a score of 54.82 w/webrender vs 122 w/Nightly

	Jeff Muizelaar [:jrmuizel] Reporter
	Comment 1 • 7 years ago

We have a fallback extravaganza on this. Turning on paint-flashing reveals its greatness.

	Jeff Muizelaar [:jrmuizel] Reporter
	Comment 2 • 7 years ago

Here's the list of filters used:
            'grayscale(50%)',
            'sepia(50%)',
            'saturate(50%)',
            'hue-rotate(180)',
            'invert(50%)',
            'opacity(50%)',
            'brightness(50%)',
            'contrast(50%)',
            'blur(10px)',
            'drop-shadow(10px 10px 10px gray)'

with bug 1415407 we support them all except for drop-shadow

	Aria Beingessner [:Gankra]
	Comment 3 • 6 years ago

I just tried running this on my mac with webrender and the score generator seemed totally busted. The actual visual behaviour seemed decent though; highlight-painted-layers shows we don't fallback.

I'm going to consider this fixed.