Closed Bug 1425924 Opened 7 years ago Closed 7 years ago

allow for a new revision in trigger_action.py

Categories

(Release Engineering :: Release Automation: Other, enhancement)

enhancement
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: mozilla, Assigned: mozilla)

References

Details

Attachments

(2 files)

Attached patch trigger_decision_id.diff (deleted) — Splinter Review
Right now, trigger_action.py gets `head_rev` from the previous action task, which is generally what we want. However, when we land a push or ship fix on a new revision, we want to get `head_rev` from the decision task we specify. So: - add --decision-task-id to be able to specify the decision task id - if it's specified, get the parameters.yml from the decision task, so we use its `head_rev` - if not, get the decision task info + parameters.yml from the action task - either way, if the `decision_task_id` isn't in the `previous_graph_ids`, prepend it. This needs testing.
Blocks: 1397773
Attachment #8937521 - Flags: review?(rail)
Comment on attachment 8937521 [details] [diff] [review] trigger_decision_id.diff Review of attachment 8937521 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: buildfarm/release/trigger_action.py @@ +7,5 @@ > import copy > +from urllib import unquote > +import requests > +from requests.adapters import HTTPAdapter > +from requests.packages.urllib3.util.retry import Retry TIL! :)
Attachment #8937521 - Flags: review?(rail) → review+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
I had to land a bustage fix for this because it broke trigger_action.py when no previous graph ids are specified on the command line: https://hg.mozilla.org/build/tools/rev/1cbc9891a6d38de1c12df7ce38beefd0f4be4b5b
Attached patch non-set version of bustage fix (deleted) — Splinter Review
On IRC, aki told me that ordering is important here - so we shouldn't use sets. This should be equivalent, but maintains ordering.
Attachment #8938066 - Flags: review?(rail)
Comment on attachment 8938066 [details] [diff] [review] non-set version of bustage fix Review of attachment 8938066 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: buildfarm/release/trigger_action.py @@ +114,4 @@ > if args.previous_graph_ids: > + previous_graph_ids.extend(args.previous_graph_ids.split(',')) > + if decision_task_id not in previous_graph_ids: > + previous_graph_ids.append(decision_task_id) IIRC the order of the task ids is important (in-tree scheduling logic uses it to find the corresponding tasks) and this patch changes it. r+ with the following change: previous_graph_ids.insert(0, decision_task_id)
Attachment #8938066 - Flags: review?(rail) → review+
Comment on attachment 8938066 [details] [diff] [review] non-set version of bustage fix Landed, and updated releaserunner3
Attachment #8938066 - Flags: checked-in+
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: