Closed
Bug 145196
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
Blank lines before tags in head (meta, link, etc...) created after editing source
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Serializers, defect)
Core
DOM: Serializers
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla1.2beta
People
(Reporter: brian, Assigned: brian)
References
Details
Attachments
(6 files, 8 obsolete files)
|
(deleted),
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
|
(deleted),
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
|
(deleted),
patch
|
akkzilla
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
(deleted),
patch
|
akkzilla
:
review+
jag+mozilla
:
superreview+
jesup
:
approval+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
(deleted),
patch
|
akkzilla
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
(deleted),
patch
|
brian
:
review+
kinmoz
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
A remaining issue from bug 46227.
After making changes in html source view then switching to normal view and back,
there are blank lines before each tag in the <head> after title. These lines
contain spaces which accumulate each time you do this.
Akkana: CC'ing you so you can look at this. I have a patch.
|
Assignee | |
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
Here is the patch. I first started by attacking the issue of the accumulating
spaces, then I was going to remove the meta tag from LineBreakBeforeOpen like
you said.
So I wrote some code to remove all spaces at the beginning of each line, and
tried it out, and I found that the newline went away completely, without
touching LineBreakBeforeOpen.
This also fixes the problem where when you edit a file that has more indenting
than Mozilla would give, the extra spaces of the indents can be kept as is, but
rewrapped so they aren't at the beginning of a line.
Unfortunately, there is a problem with this patch. There are cases where the
space at the beginning of the string does mean something:
test<b> case</b>
" case" becomes "case", and this becomes one word.
|
||
Updated•23 years ago
|
|
||
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
Burpmaster: are you sure that these lines are coming for every tag, not just
tags that are listed in LineBreakBeforeOpen? I tried putting some random tags,
like <b>, in the head, and they didn't get blank lines prepended; but meta and
script did. (LineBreakBeforeOpen will return true for any block node, as well
as the tags listed explicitly.) I'm not sure the extra line is bad in the case
of script; I agree it looks funny for the meta tags; what other tags cause this
behavior?
|
|
||
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 4•23 years ago
|
||
I don't think listing an element in LineBreakBeforeOpen was ever intended to
put two lines breaks in. I can see that it's making a check if the current
line is blank (if mColPos is zero) before inserting a newline.
As long as an element (meta or link) should start on its own line, it should be
listed there. We don't want <meta> on the same line as <title>. The real
problem is that there were always a few spaces on the line at the time
LineBreakBeforeOpen was called, so LineBreakBeforeOpen decided there needed to
be a line break. I also noticed the same thing was happening before </tr> in
tables.
This patch removes any unnecessary spaces at the beginning of each line, which
fixes both the <meta> and </tr> problem.
I also found a bug introduced by my fix to bug 46227. I had assumed the first
and last newline served no purpose and could be removed without being converted
to spaces. This wasn't always the case. For example:
a<b>
b
</b>c
would have the newlines removed and no spaces would take their place.
It now checks if mColPos==0 to determine if the first newline should be
removed, and I moved addSpace outside of AppendToStringWrapped and renamed it
to mAddSpace.
To deal with the ending newline, I moved addSpace out of AppendToStringWrapped
and put it in the header file (named mAddSpace now). This is to wait and see
if a newline is added for the next element appended before adding the space.
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
Removes all leading and trailing spaces in the old lines when pretty-printing,
but makes sure that at least one space is preserved when it makes a difference,
such as
"a<b> b </b>c" (also handles the situation correctly if you replace those
spaces with newlines)
This fixes all the current newline/space problems I'm aware of, including the
<meta> and <links> issues, as well as extra spaces after </tr> in tables, and
extra spaces after the <td> before a table nested within that <td>.
It also a problem introduced in the fix for bug 46227.
With this patch, you can now open a file, make a change, save it, open again,
change, and save again, and not have it grow each time!
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
|
|
||
Comment 7•22 years ago
|
||
The logic looks good (I haven't tested it yet -- I've been away at offsites for
the last few days). Two issues:
1. Please initialize mAddSpace (to PR_FALSE, I assume) in
nsHTMLContentSerializer::nsHTMLContentSerializer. Most of the time it may get
initialized in time by hitting tags with break before, but let's not count on it.
2. if (Substring(aStr, strOffset, 1) == NS_LITERAL_STRING(" "))
I'm worried about this possibly having performance problems. Cc'ing jag, the
string expert: jag, can you comment on whether this needs to be rewritten to use
string iterators?
Do you think this patch might also cure bug 141983? I asked Joe to cc both of
us on that bug when he mentioned it in a meeting today; it sounds similar.
|
||
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 85413 [details] [diff] [review]
newer patch
>+ while (strOffset < length) {
>+
>+ // Cut all leading spaces
>+ if (Substring(aStr, strOffset, 1) == NS_LITERAL_STRING(" ")) {
>+ strOffset++;
>+ while ((Substring(aStr, strOffset, 1) == NS_LITERAL_STRING(" ")) && (strOffset < length)) {
>+ strOffset++;
>+ }
This is pretty expensive since you'll be creating two temporary objects per
space you need to skip. A cheaper alternative is to use iterators (not quite
unlike using const char* to iterate over C strings):
nsAString::const_iterator begin, end, iter, endIter;
aStr.BeginReading(begin);
aStr.EndReading(end);
iter = begin;
while (iter != end) {
if (*iter == ' ') {
++iter;
while (iter != end && *iter == ' ')
++iter;
strOffset = Distance(begin, iter);
if (mColPos > 0)
mAddSpace = PR_TRUE;
}
// This is how much is needed to fill up the new line
...
}
Or you could get rid of strOffset and completely switch to iterators if you
want.
For skipping the spaces at the end:
// this logic is kinda odd looking and would go away if one were to use
// endIter = iter; // start searching from iter
// FindCharInReadable(PRUnichar(' '), endIter, end);
// in the code above this, since endIter will be set to |end| if
// no space was found.
if (indx != kNotFound) {
endIter = begin;
endIter.advance(indx);
} else {
endIter = end;
}
// skip all trailing spaces
if (endIter != iter) {
--endIter; // endIter points after the end of the string, move it one back
if (*endIter == ' ') {
while (endIter != iter) {
--endIter;
if (*endIter != ' ') {
++endIter; // make endIter point after the last non-space
break;
}
}
// Add back one space. This will get cancelled when necessary.
mAddSpace = PR_TRUE;
} else {
++endIter; // make endIter point after the last non-space
}
lineLength = Distance(iter, endIter);
if (lineLength > 0) {
line = Substring(aStr, strOffset, lineLength);
// alternatively:
// if (iter != endIter) {
// line = Substring(iter, endIter);
It's up to the module owner, reviewer and super reviewer to decide whether to
take the patch as is or rewrite this code using iterators, the above is merely
some guidance on how they can be used. If you do decide to use iterators and
have questions, feel free to ask me.
|
|
||
Comment 9•22 years ago
|
||
Oh, I had one formatting issue with the patch that I forgot to mention before:
please split the two long while lines, to keep line length less than 80 columns,
so that it displays everywhere and can be printed on all printers.
My guess is that jst will want to see the iterators used rather than Substring
when it's time to ask for his sr, and I would prefer that too (but wouldn't
block it for that if it's okay with jst -- cc'ing).
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 10•22 years ago
|
||
Here's a rewrite using string iterators. I keep the position of the last space
encountered in order to always wrap before column 72, not always after.
This patch fixes the bug, but it currently only removes leading spaces, not
trailing spaces. I think consecutive spaces should be reduced to one, since
they wouldn't be preserved in a rewrap anyway. I'm currently figuring out the
best way to do that. I haven't added code to remove trailing spaces yet
because the code to reduce consecutive whitespace chars will handle that.
Any comments on this patch?
|
||
Comment 11•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 87082 [details] [diff] [review]
Rewrite of AppendToStringWrapped, v. 1
Two comments after a quick look:
+ pos++;
+ while ((*pos == ' ' || *pos == '\n') && (pos != end)) {
+ pos++;
+ }
Never ever use the post-increment (or decrement) operators on iterators (or any
other non-trivial types for that matter), they're *way* more expensive than
using the pre-increment operators (i.e. do ++pos, not pos++).
And also, you need to move the (pos != end) check to the beginning of the
condition, accessing an iterator that points past the end of the string is not
safe.
Attachment #87082 -
Flags: needs-work+
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 12•22 years ago
|
||
I'll probably do another rewrite. I saw nsDependentSubstring in
nsHTMLContentSerializer::AppendToStringConvertLF. I couldn't find any
documentation, but I could tell it was being used to append a substring to
another string, and it sounded like it would be pretty fast.
I changed it to use nsDependentSubstring, and changed to pre-increments. But
before I attach the new version, I need to ask if by telling me to move the (pos
!= end) check to the beginning of the condition, you mean I should change
while ((*pos == ' ' || *pos == '\n') && (pos != end))
to
while ((pos != end) && (*pos == ' ' || *pos == '\n'))
I was under the impression that there is no guarantee across all compiler
settings/platforms that the check will end early if I get a false.
But to get to the reason I wanted to do another rewrite, I figured the biggest
performance problem was that an intermediate string was created every time we
needed to append, so I coded it like the original code, to append an entire
string of words seperated by spaces from the original string instead of
appending one word at a time.
But I wonder if by using both string iterators and nsDependentSubstring, I could
still get good performance appending one word at a time. The code would be a
whole lot simpler, that's for sure. How would I measure performance here?
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.1beta
|
|
||
Comment 13•22 years ago
|
||
> I was under the impression that there is no guarantee across all compiler
> settings/platforms that the check will end early if I get a false.
The check will end early on all compilers we care about (since the language
requires them to end it early).
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 14•22 years ago
|
||
Fixing those two problems and using nsDependentSubstring.
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 15•22 years ago
|
||
Much cleaner way of doing things. I need to figure out how to do some
performance testing.
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 16•22 years ago
|
||
Oops, had a little last-minute typo in v2.
|
|
||
Comment 17•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 89000 [details] [diff] [review]
Rewrite of AppendToStringWrapped, v. 3
>Index: nsHTMLContentSerializer.cpp
>===================================================================
[ ... ]
>+ // cut leading spaces
>+ if (*pos == ' ' || *pos == '\n') {
>+ ++pos;
This sometimes cuts off spaces that need to be there. For example, type:
Here is some <b>bold</b> text (followed by some gibberish to make it wrap to a
couple of lines)
Go into source mode and you'll see it correctly; but go back to normal and do
OutputHTML, and you'll see that the space between bold and text disappears.
Also, the first line is really long -- maybe it's not actually going through
the wrapping code at that point?
When I save it, the space is there again; but I don't trust it always to be
there if it's not there in OutputHTML. I'm not quite sure why it's happening.
This is also kind of ironic: you've completely rewritten wrapping, which is
fine, it needed to be rewritten; but the reason it needed to be rewritten is
that it doesn't use the I18n-approved nsILineBreaker like nsPlainTextSerializer
uses. That's okay, you're not making it any less internationalizable (and I
wouldn't let that block a review if you get it working); but this latest patch
is actually farther from being able to use the line breaker, so if anyone ever
does decide to go in and make it I18n clean, they'll probably have to tear out
all your new code (unless you can find a line breaker interface that will take
a character at a time from string iterators, which maybe it can.)
Sorry, I probably should have noticed that and mentioned it earlier, but I
didn't realize what a complete rewrite it was. The actual liklihood of anyone
rewriting the code soon to use the line breaker is fairly small anyway, and
your algorithm is better than the code you're replacing (it made lines too
long, yours doesn't), so I have no problem taking this if you can fix the minor
issue with spaces after tags, and add a few more comments for people like me
who find wrapping algorithms hard to follow.
I was initially not clear on the difference between mAddSpace and spaceInLine.
Could you add a short comment somewhere explaining early on what spaceInLine
will be used for. Basically it's to guard against lines with abnormally long
words, right? But you can describe it in whatever way seems clearest to you.
>+ else if (c == '\n') {
>+
>+ if (mAddSpace) {
Minor nit: is the blank line here intentional?
I was confused about what the clause beginning here was doing, but I think I
have it now -- if we get an embedded newline, then we save what we have so far,
plus a space if one is called for, and re-start the segment -- but why is
mAddSpace true since we might have just written a space to the output string?
For the rest:
I like the break if we get to max col, then break at the saved last space.
That will fix the "lines too long" bug in the current code, and spaceInLine
handling the long-word case; I don't see any problems with that part. I think
this is really close and will be better than what is there now; just put my
mind at ease about the one dropped space example
I wish we had a good tough wrapping test in the output tests (both plaintext
and html could use it). I should try to write one sometime.
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 18•22 years ago
|
||
I set mAddSpace to true if we are not at the beginning of the line, so if some
more text continues on the current line, a space is added first. I was unable
to reproduce the missing space from the Output HTML command in the debug menu of
Composer.
I wanted to time the two versions of AppendToStringWrapped that I wrote, so the
first one isn't finished yet. I still need to add back the cutting of trailing
spaces.
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 19•22 years ago
|
||
Did a little more work on it, and added some comments. Hopefully this is
clearer.
Attachment #84032 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #84198 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #85413 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #87082 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #88918 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #89000 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 20•22 years ago
|
||
Now that I'm cutting trailing spaces as well, I'm making sure to set mAddSpace
to true when the string ends with trailing spaces, and false when it doesn't.
I think this patch is just about ready...
Attachment #91624 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
|
|
||
Comment 21•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 91815 [details] [diff] [review]
Rewrite of AppendToStringWrapped, v. 5
>+ segStart = pos;
>+ spaceSeen = PR_FALSE;
>+ ++segStart;
Can these two seqStart lines be collapsed into one, e.g. seqStart = pos+1 ?
> if (c == ' ') {
> lastSpace = pos;
> spaceSeen = PR_TRUE;
> }
> else if (c == '\n') {
I'm not really clear on why spaces and newlines in the input stream aren't
equivalent. Can you explain? It does work (at least for the cases I've
thought of to test, and doesn't break the serializer tests) but I'd like to
understand it better.
I'll go ahead and stamp it r=akkana now on the assumption that there's a good
reason for it -- the patch certainly makes things better than before.
Attachment #91815 -
Flags: review+
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 22•22 years ago
|
||
Newlines and spaces in the input aren't treated the same because I'm doing the
same thing the old code did, trying to speed things up by appending in larger
chunks, rather than a simple cycle of append word, append space, append word,
and so on. Several words can be taken and appended together as long as they are
separated only by spaces and not newlines. If a newline is encountered where
one shouldn't be, the only option is to append what we have so far, add a space,
and then start reading again from after the newline.
This was obviously important for performance with the old code, where a
temporary string was created for each append, but now that I'm using string
iterators and have found nsDependentSubstring, I wonder if appending one word at
a time could now have good performance.
I actually did write a patch to append one word at a time, which is far simpler.
It is attachment 88919 [details] [diff] [review]. Perhaps you missed that one.
It writes long lines like the old code, but I can easily fix that if we decide
to go the simple route, and I know of no other problems with that patch.
|
|
||
Comment 23•22 years ago
|
||
What you have is fine -- let's stick with it (unless you want to go back to the
other patch and fix the long-lines problem).
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 24•22 years ago
|
||
In that case, I think it's ready. No, those two lines can't be condensed into
one, as the behavoir for adding a number to an iterator doesn't seem to be defined.
Out of curiosity, I figured out how to time things, and I measured the time
spent in nsDocumentEncoder::EncodeToString serializing about 1 meg of random
characters and spaces.
Current CVS code: 357ms
The complex code: 450ms
The simpler code: 571ms
|
|
||
Comment 25•22 years ago
|
||
jst or jag, could you sr this, please?
|
|
||
Comment 26•22 years ago
|
||
Is there anything we can do about the significant slowdown that this patch
introduces? I guess this code is fast enough for what we use it for, but still,
if we can speed it up we should...
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 27•22 years ago
|
||
I suppose this is why:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xpcom/string-guide.html#Looping_Iterators
Yes, it is fast enough for what we use it for. As far as I know it's only used
in Composer, when pretty print is on, and probably always with HTML mail. Even
half a meg is unusually large to edit in Composer or send as mail, but I'll go
ahead and try out what is suggested at that URL.
|
|
||
Comment 28•22 years ago
|
||
Are we simply doing more work (looking at it on a higher level), or is this due
to the chosen implementation, or a combination of both?
I think your code will become quite a bit more complex if you use an outer loop
(fragments) and inner loop (characters within fragment) approach.
Hmmm, after looking at this code some more, does |aStr| really need to be of
type |nsAString| or could it be |nsASingleFragmentString|? It's only called from
two places, both of which pass in an nsAutoString.
burpmaster, could you try the following and see how it impacts your time
measurements:
Change |aStr|'s type to |const nsASingleFragmentString&| and change the iterator
types to |nsASingleFragmentString::const_char_iterator|.
That should be enough to get your code working with |const PRUnichar*| iterators
instead of the multi-fragment ones, and should give you an idea of the impact of
the multi-fragment iterators on the times you measured.
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 29•22 years ago
|
||
373ms
|
|
||
Comment 30•22 years ago
|
||
So 20ms slower than "current" CVS. Could anything else (e.g. updating to the
trunk) explain those 20ms? What does this patch do better than the old code?
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 31•22 years ago
|
||
When I posted that last patch, I did another test of the current code in CVS,
and got the same result, so the 20ms difference is because of the patch.
The patch avoids writing spaces at the beginning of a line to prevent
indentation from accumulating on each pretty-printing.
When the string ends in a space, it isn't written immediately so that it won't
be written if a newline follows (such as in the case of tags in
LineBreakBeforeOpen).
Wrapping now occurs before the column limit, instead of always after it.
So this stops the blank lines in the <head> tag and fixes bug 147494.
Target Milestone: mozilla1.1beta → mozilla1.2alpha
|
|
||
Comment 32•22 years ago
|
||
Well, fixing a couple of bugs, cleaning up code, and it only costs 20ms. I'm
pretty happy with that. Akkana, if you could r= this last patch, I'll sr it
if/when you're happy.
|
|
||
Comment 33•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 93401 [details] [diff] [review]
patch using nsASingleFragmentString
>+ aOutputStr.Append(segStart, lastChar - segStart + 1);
In the previous patch you did a lastChar++ here (instead of just adding 1 to
the argument), and you make that change in one other place. You also changed
if (pos != lastChar) to if (pos != lastChar+1) (that's a diff between the two
patches) which is consistent with that. But the handling of lastChar didn't
change in the other couple of places where it's referenced. The code looks
right and works for my tests, but please reassure me that this was intentional.
>+ // write up to the last space encountered
>+ //nsDependentSubstring dataSubstring(segStart, lastSpace);
>+ //aOutputStr.Append(dataSubstring);
>+ aOutputStr.Append(segStart, lastSpace - segStart);
Should probably remove the commented-out lines.
Otherwise, r=akkana.
Attachment #93401 -
Flags: review+
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 34•22 years ago
|
||
Yeah, the + 1 stuff was intentional, because I want to include that char in the
string, where with lastSpace I don't.
This is just taking into account that Substring(start, end) actually refers to
the characters from start to end-1.
Attachment #93401 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
|
|
||
Comment 35•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 96175 [details] [diff] [review]
commented out code removed
Transferring r=akkana from previous patch.
Attachment #96175 -
Flags: review+
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 36•22 years ago
|
||
Er, is this waiting for something?
Jag? Akkana?
Target Milestone: mozilla1.2alpha → mozilla1.2beta
|
|
||
Comment 37•22 years ago
|
||
Jag? You offered in comment 32 to sr this ... does the offer still hold? Maybe
we can get it in in time for the 1.2beta freeze tomorrow night.
|
|
||
Comment 38•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 96175 [details] [diff] [review]
commented out code removed
sr=jag
Sorry, too many bugs to keep track of, it helps if you ping me in e-mail (not
bugmail).
Attachment #96175 -
Flags: superreview+
|
||
Comment 39•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 96175 [details] [diff] [review]
commented out code removed
a=rjesup@wgate.com for trunk
Attachment #96175 -
Flags: approval+
|
|
||
Comment 40•22 years ago
|
||
I've checked in the fix for Burpmaster; taking the liberty of marking the bug
fixed (reopen if there are any issues remaining).
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
|
||
Comment 41•22 years ago
|
||
This commit have added a "may be used unitialized" warning on brad TBox:
+content/base/src/nsHTMLContentSerializer.cpp:658
+ `const PRUnichar * lastSpace' might be used uninitialized in this function
|
||
Comment 42•22 years ago
|
||
This fix corrected problems when "Reformat HTML source" is selected in Composer
Preferences.
There are still many similar problems existing when "Retain original source
formatting" is selected. They have existed since at least August, 2002. I was
waiting to see if this bug fix corrected them. Still exist in build 2002102204.
See Bug 159615 Comment #6 and attached test case for these problems.
|
|
||
Comment 43•22 years ago
|
||
Reopening the bug to deal with the warning fix. Burpmaster? Should lasSpace be
initialized to end, or what?
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 44•22 years ago
|
||
lastSpace is never used unless spaceSeen is true, and spaceSeen is only set to
true after lastSpace is set. A null value could probably be used here instead.
So there's no real problem here, but to fix the warning I'll initialize
lastSpace to the beginning of the string. That makes more sense to me as
lastSpace refers to the last space encountered, and it would always be at or
before the current position.
|
||
Comment 45•22 years ago
|
||
What is the state of this bug? Is it still broken or only in some cases?
|
|
||
Comment 46•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 190443 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
|
|
||
Comment 47•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 188616 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
|
||
Comment 48•22 years ago
|
||
The only thing I see in 1.2.1 is that the tags inside the <head> tag, are
wrapped if they are too long. For example this tag, get wrapped:
<meta name="keywords" content="very long, very long, very long, very long, very
long, very long, very long, very long">
When switching from normal view to html source, nothing happend for me anymore.
I have: Mozilla 1.2.1 WinXP SP1
The bug #159615 deals with the <style> tags inside the <head> tag.
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 49•22 years ago
|
||
This bug is fixed, where "this bug" refers to issues when HTML reformatting is
turned on.
The only remaining issue I'm aware of is bug 176866, which is very similar, but
only occurs when HTML source reformatting is off.
If you're wondering about the reopened status, see comment 43. This bug was
reopened to fix a compiler warning.
|
||
Comment 50•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 194579 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 51•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 104262 [details] [diff] [review]
Warning fix
I guess I should get this patch reviewed.
Attachment #104262 -
Flags: review?(akkana)
|
|
||
Comment 52•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 104262 [details] [diff] [review]
Warning fix
The fix looks fine, r=akkana. But as long as we're in there, can we fix the
remaining warning in the file? I'll attach a patch that does that (and also
fixes a too-long line).
Attachment #104262 -
Flags: review?(akkana) → review+
|
|
||
Comment 53•22 years ago
|
||
|
|
||
Comment 54•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 118303 [details] [diff] [review]
Fix the last remaining warning (sign comparison error)
Burpmaster, can you review my additional warning fix? Thanks!
Attachment #118303 -
Flags: review?(burpmaster)
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 55•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 118303 [details] [diff] [review]
Fix the last remaining warning (sign comparison error)
Yeah, looks good. r=burpmaster
Attachment #118303 -
Flags: review?(burpmaster) → review+
|
|
||
Comment 56•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 118303 [details] [diff] [review]
Fix the last remaining warning (sign comparison error)
Kin: could you please sr this 2-line warning/formatting fix? Thanks!
Attachment #118303 -
Flags: superreview?(kin)
|
||
Comment 57•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 118303 [details] [diff] [review]
Fix the last remaining warning (sign comparison error)
sr=kin@netscape.com
Attachment #118303 -
Flags: superreview?(kin) → superreview+
|
|
||
Comment 58•22 years ago
|
||
Fix is in. Thanks, burpmaster! That's the last issue, and it's safe to mark
this fixed now, right?
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago → 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 59•22 years ago
|
||
Yeah, since bug 176866 covers the case when "Retain original source formatting"
is turned off.
|
|
||
Comment 60•22 years ago
|
||
Note that Bug 176866 has been marked as a dupe of Bug 97278.
See Bug 97278 for "Retain original source formatting" mode where this behavior
still exists.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•