Disable LSNG in 72
Categories
(Core :: Storage: localStorage & sessionStorage, task, P1)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: janv, Assigned: janv)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
(deleted),
text/x-phabricator-request
|
jcristau
:
approval-mozilla-release+
|
Details |
We can't ship it on Release until storage initialization failures are addressed.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•5 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•5 years ago
|
||
Try push:
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=42cd9529210c9c39ae6151aec5c89dd87451e4a1
Only c3 on win debug failed and that can be easily fixed by increasing the number of expected assertions, like in bug 1581722.
Updated•5 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•5 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9118464 [details]
Bug 1606781 - Disable LSNG in 72; r=asuth
Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request
- User impact if declined: If LSNG is enabled, LocalStorage depends on QuotaManager storage which is currently broken for some users. We don't want to ship LSNG until the issue is fixed.
- Is this code covered by automated tests?: Yes
- Has the fix been verified in Nightly?: No
- Needs manual test from QE?: No
- If yes, steps to reproduce:
- List of other uplifts needed: None
- Risk to taking this patch: Low
- Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): This patch just disables LSNG, so the old implementation of LocalStorage will be used in FF 72. We fully support downgrading of LocalStorage data, so if some users already tried a beta build, they should be safe. We disabled LSNG in previous beta cycles and there were no problems reported after the switch.
- String changes made/needed: None
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•5 years ago
|
||
I requested an approval before actual r+, so please wait a bit, thanks.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•5 years ago
|
||
I talked with :asuth yesterday and he agreed that we are going to disable it in 72.
Comment 6•5 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9118464 [details]
Bug 1606781 - Disable LSNG in 72; r=asuth
The same changes were reviewed in bug 1594299 and bug 1581722, I think that's good enough; approved for 72.0-build4.
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 7•5 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 8•5 years ago
|
||
Hi Jan, can you please file the Fx73 bug and CC me to it? Thanks!
Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Description
•