Closed
Bug 183291
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
file became corrupted repeatedly when using download manager to download
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: Download & File Handling, defect)
SeaMonkey
Download & File Handling
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: eg987321_987321, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: dataloss)
Attachments
(1 obsolete file)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
Build Identifier: ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/releases/mozilla1.2.1/mozilla-win32-1.2.1-installer.exe
When attempting to download a file from http://www.blindwrite.com/, the file was
corrupted on each try. The download went well when i used Internet Explorer
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Go to blindwrite download page and click on one of the links for "English
only-no manuals"
2.Download file using download manager
3.Try to run file after download
Actual Results:
The file was much smaller than it should have been. When i tryed to run the file
it said that it was corrupted
OS is Windows ME
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
I have a similar problem with the nightly build for Solaris 2.7
Build ID: 0000000000 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.3b;
MultiZilla v1.1.33 (b)) Gecko/20030127)
When I try to download
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/win32/cdrtools-1.10-win32-bin.zip
with the download manager, I get a corrupted file with the correct file size.
The same file downloaded with wget has the right CRC.
Flags: blocking1.3b+
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
I just wanted to say that I too am having a problem with corrupted files from
the Download Manager. For example, when I download the mozilla.zip file from
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest/ I get a zip file of the same
size as when I use Internet Explorer. But when I unzip it, winzip reports three
CRC errors. But the one from IE unzips without any errors. I have tried it
three different times.
Win XP, direct internet connection, no proxy.
Exactly the same problem. I run Moz 1.3.1 on both Windows 98 and Linux boxes.
Downloads are *unreliable* on both OS's - to the extent that I have to use Ie5.
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
Mac OSX 10.2.6 Darwin Kernel Version 6.6
I just "upgraded" from Mozilla 1.3 to 1.4, hit a bug in mail, tried twice (now
with 1.4) to download the latest build before reporting the mail bug, but I get
a file full of zeros.
% ls -al mozilla-mac-MachO.dmg.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 ### ### 15993602 Aug 26 19:10 mozilla-mac-MachO.dmg.gz
% hexdump mozilla-mac-MachO.dmg.gz
0000000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
*
0f40b00
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007
Windows XP SP1
On several occassions I encountered corrupted downloads of multimedia files. The
files (WAV and MPG) were beyond recognition.
This happened when doing concurrent downloads (multiple files at a time). When
opening one file from the web right into the player app, the download was ok.
Comment 7•21 years ago
|
||
In addition to my previous posting:
download corruption also happens when doing a single download.
Comment 8•21 years ago
|
||
I have the same problem with files that download (sometimes download does not
even start - separate bug) being invalid files. I have not successfully
downloaded a file (other than "save image as") for several months with Mozilla
1.6 and now 1.7 RC and I am forced to open Explorer for all download activity.
issue: file download "completes" but file is bad
reproduce: always (if download starts - separate bug)
Mozilla 1.7 RC
Windows 98 SE
description: file to download (any type) will be smaller when "completed" than
reported by server and therefore invalid. (ex. .avi file to download 1874kb
reported by webserver, 1851kb recieved but download dialog shows "complete",
invalid file... unable to open file)
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
I can confirm the same bug...Happens all the time and I have to use IE to d/l
the files I want. For example go to http://www.math.uga.edu/~djb/html/dvd.html
and try to d/l (save to disk) FreeZoneLG6053.exe which is 52,551 bytes long. The
saved file is something less and thus corrupt.
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
spyros: i just downloaded FreeZoneLG6053.exe from the above site with firefox
0.9.3 and mozilla 1.7b and was unable to reproduce the issue. i did see it long
ago, though. perhaps you are running into some sort of network issue between
you and the server. maybe dumping the packets with ethereal would help you get
to the bottom of this? you could compare the bad download to a good one with IE...
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
Comment 11•20 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Comment 12•20 years ago
|
||
One of the ways that music firms try to discourage pirated music downloads is by
uploading corrupt files to illicit servers. I don't know if bad software is sent
to illicit software servers, but this seems like a possibility to consider.
I downloaded both the cdtools zipfile and the Freezone program and unzipped the
cdtools file ok. The Freezone program has the right size, though I didn't try to
run it. I've successfully downloaded each new Mozilla version with the preceding
one for a year and a half.
If one is experiencing corrupted downloads, there must be some other explanation
than a problem with the integrity of Mozilla's data transport.
Comment 13•20 years ago
|
||
Download of large DIVX files in FF seem to be corrupted in FF, same files
downloaded in IE, Opera and NS are working fine.
Comment 14•20 years ago
|
||
Comment 15•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 277727 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 279424 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 17•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 274552 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 211304 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 19•20 years ago
|
||
This bug must be a particularly tricky one to squash -- it's been open for two+
years! It (and its relatives, whether of the sequential or multiple download
type) seem quite virulent, given the number of reported occurences.
It *bugs* me that this is a long-standing problem. I've switched to Firefox,
EXCEPT when I need to download files (use IE or something using the IE engine).
It's really the only fundamental area where I feel Firefox is lacking... :(
I suspect that, for a complex problem of this type, the developers need better
information in order to reproduce the behavior. If I could get from them a
better idea of what information is desired, perhaps I could construct a better
test case?
Or... is the work-around to install an external download manager? Is that what
the rest of you are doing?
Comment 20•20 years ago
|
||
Verified in Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.6)
Gecko/20050225 Firefox/1.0.1
Comment 21•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 252719 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 22•20 years ago
|
||
I'm not so sure this is a duplicate of 252719. Most of the comments here are
about a bug where the file size is too small. Yes, Firefox does seem to give up
on a file transfer before it is complete and the file ends up being too small.
However, I've also seen file sizes be completely correct when downloading
multiple files but the md5sums of the files don't match. This would imply
(though this hasn't been definitely confirmed) that (1) cross-contamination of
data, and if (1) applies then so does (2): a threat that someone who understands
the contamination pattern could take advantage of it to insert malicious code.
Comment 23•20 years ago
|
||
BAD DOWNLOADS happen a lot recently from Mozilla's own servers. I've been using
nightlies most of the time for the past month or two, and in the past two weeks
or so have been getting a lot of defective downloads.
Today I downloaded the nightly dated 4-10 for Win32, and got a file sized
11,343,904 bytes. The official size is 11,992K according to the server I'm
trying again on. It's not the same server, or at least not the same interface.
The first time, I used a traditional ftp interface, and now it's a web interface
from a German mirror,
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla/nightly/latest-trunk/
gotta go, damn thunderstorm.s here.
Comment 24•20 years ago
|
||
To continue, the download completed without any errors reported. I thought that
tcp/ip networking included detection of bad packets and requests for resending.
This never was a problem doing downloads with Mozilla until very recently,
perhaps the past month. Today when I ran the download to install the latest, the
installer first reported xpcom.xpi and another xpi module being corrupt. I tried
running it again and got just a crash.
I then checked the download size and found that the download failed to complete,
but the Download Manager indicated it was complete and didn'r report errors.
I think this new set of downloading problems got into the 1.8x code while
perhaps not into the 1.7x code. I switched back to 1.7x earlier because of some
other types of download failures in 1.8a6.
These failures are unacceptable. Downloading ought to be a mastered art by now.
Comment 25•20 years ago
|
||
To continue, the download completed without any errors reported. I thought that
tcp/ip networking included detection of bad packets and requests for resending
bad packets.
Today when I ran the download to install the latest, the installer first
reported xpcom.xpi and another xpi module being corrupt. I tried running it
again and got just a crash.
I then checked the download size and found that the download failed to complete,
but the Download Manager indicated it was complete and didn'r report errors.
I think this new set of downloading problems got into the 1.8x code while
perhaps not into the 1.7x code. I switched back to 1.7x earlier because of some
other types of download failures in 1.8a6. It may be that I didn't notice
earlier problems with 1.8x because I stopped using it for a while, but someone
should have been noticing and reporting problems downloading in 1.8x.
Serving and receiving ftp and http downloads should be a mastered art by now.
Comment 26•20 years ago
|
||
Sorry about the duplicate reports. 11,343,904 bytes was the size of the
defective download, reported complete with no errors. The second try was good,
12,279,420 bytes.
Comment 27•20 years ago
|
||
Today, in trying to download the latest nightly, I was asked if the old
mozilla-win32-installer.exe should be overwritten by the new one. I said yes.
Then the download started, but after a few seconds the download manager
reported that it was finished.
I deleted the old nightly file and retried. This time, I noticed that the
download was reported complete much too soon, though the download manager
reported the right number of bytes for the new file.
Here's the real file info---wrong size, obviously not complete.
MOZILL~7 EXE 1,770,660 04-16-05 5:19p mozilla-win32-installer.exe
The download manager wrongly reported the download as done, wrongly reported the
file size, and gave no error messages. The dialup connection stayed up, so that
was not the reason for the failed download.
This happened using Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050411
Comment 28•20 years ago
|
||
The download manager seems to stop downloading when another process hogs the I/O
device. For example, my email program shows a box to approve a certificate from
my real ISP (instead of my mail domain name) and the download from Mozilla stops
until the approval request box is dismissed. Then, if the download has quit
(either the server or the local program timing out because of inactivity, not
sure which), the download manager MARKS THE DOWNLOAD AS COMPLETE AND REPORTS THE
CORRECT FILESIZE. The actual file on the disk is of course not complete, but
it's renamed from .par to .exe as if it is complete.
This happened repeatedly to me today, all due to the security warning box from
Mozilla mail (questioning certificate approval for a secure connection) hogged
the I/O and stopped the downloading.
Ftp/http downloads, page loads, and chat should not be stopped dead in the water
by another process's dialog box. The processes should be able to run
concurrently even if one is waiting on dialog, etc.
Comment 29•19 years ago
|
||
john t: re: comment #28, that is bug 74331.
nb: i still see this same behavior with recent firefox releases. i opened bug
301894 to track this for the FF product.
Comment 30•19 years ago
|
||
Never mind my remarks here about bad downloads. I found that the disk drive I
saved to went bad. Sorry.
Comment 31•19 years ago
|
||
While downloading the firefox download to initially install Firefox, I received
the corrupt file message when I clicked on the "run" on the message that
internet explorer gives at the conclusion of a download. Once I shut IE down
and ran the Firefox install program from the "run" command, it opened just fine.
You may wish to instruct people who are initially downloading the program to
initiate installation by shutting down IE.
Further anomalys:
when I attempted to download Mozilla-win32-1.7.12-installer.exe (finished @
aprox 9:28pm 12Oct2005), It transfered at only 6k/sec. I was using my new
installation of Firefox to initiate it. Typical cable download speeds are
usually around 300-500kps. Are you guys serving with 56k modems? (-:
I am using wavecable.com (Wave Broadband inc). Their headquarters are in
Kirkland WA. There may be interferance eminating from Redmond and affecting
broadband transmissions from companies in close proximity to Redmond.
Comment 32•19 years ago
|
||
The download mgr messed up when I paused a download, went offline to use my phone, then reconnected and tried to resume. I couldn't resume because the download mgr and properties box indicated that the download was complete, though it certainly was NOT complete. This happens with stalled downloads, I think, but I expected that the pause button might allow for going offline and back online to resume a download, since the program wasn't exited. If the pause button doesn't provide that function, what good is it?
Comment 33•19 years ago
|
||
This Oct 26 experience happened with Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20051021 SeaMonkey/1.1a
Comment 34•19 years ago
|
||
No longer depends on: 252719
Comment 35•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 171406 [details]
the original image as hosted on another site: http://sis.agr.gc.ca/cansis/taxa/soil/brunisolic/eutric_yt.jpg
image is corrupted.
Also, reporter is gone.
Attachment #171406 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 36•19 years ago
|
||
I recently read a post to www.linuxquestions.org mentioning two programs (uxcook and uxcook 95?) that are made to fix downloads from improperly configured servers that work with MSIE but apparently not with UNIX downloaders. It may be that Mozilla/Firefox is having problems with similarly configured servers, which I assume have nonstandard settings or behavior. Could these misconfigured servers be a source of corrupt Mozilla and Firefox downloads?
If so, would adding some uxcook code fix the problem? I assume uxcook is GNU or otherwise freely available.
Comment 37•19 years ago
|
||
WFM trunk - tested the reported URLs. I've never had a problem
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060206 SeaMonkey/1.5a
Comment 38•18 years ago
|
||
no response from reporter, resolving WFM
there is an existing bug on file for what's described in comment 32 (resuming downloads)
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•