Closed Bug 219841 Opened 21 years ago Closed 20 years ago

Add site field in image manager

Categories

(Core :: Graphics: Image Blocking, enhancement)

enhancement
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 89904

People

(Reporter: thesh_bugs, Assigned: security-bugs)

Details

(Keywords: verifyme)

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030916 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030916 Currently you can only block image servers by clicking on the image to block it, or visiting the site you want to block images from. I think that in the image manager there should be an "add" field like there is in the popup manager where I can add the domain that I would like to block. Here is an example of what I would like to be able to do: Let's say there is a really annoying image I want to block, and this is the server it is on: a.sitewithannoyingimages.com I block that server and I do a little browsing and find an image at this server: b.sitewithannoyingimages.com I will have to re-block it, and I would probably find another annoying image from them on another server, but it would be best if I could just open image manager and add this: sitewithannoyingimages.com And that would block all images from that domain. Another possibility is this: A site that you like to visit puts up a really annoying image for some reason, and it is located here: www.sitethatyouliketovisit.com/siteimage/annoyingimage.gif You could block that site, but there are probably other images that you don't find annoying and want to see; blocking the server will block them all. I would like to be able to add in the location of that one specific image to block. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 33467 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
Summary: Add site field in image manager. → Add site field in image manager
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 89904 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago20 years ago
Keywords: verifyme
QA Contact: benc
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.