Closed
Bug 219841
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Add site field in image manager
Categories
(Core :: Graphics: Image Blocking, enhancement)
Core
Graphics: Image Blocking
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: thesh_bugs, Assigned: security-bugs)
Details
(Keywords: verifyme)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030916
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030916
Currently you can only block image servers by clicking on the image to block it,
or visiting the site you want to block images from. I think that in the image
manager there should be an "add" field like there is in the popup manager where
I can add the domain that I would like to block.
Here is an example of what I would like to be able to do:
Let's say there is a really annoying image I want to block, and this is the
server it is on:
a.sitewithannoyingimages.com
I block that server and I do a little browsing and find an image at this server:
b.sitewithannoyingimages.com
I will have to re-block it, and I would probably find another annoying image
from them on another server, but it would be best if I could just open image
manager and add this:
sitewithannoyingimages.com
And that would block all images from that domain.
Another possibility is this:
A site that you like to visit puts up a really annoying image for some reason,
and it is located here:
www.sitethatyouliketovisit.com/siteimage/annoyingimage.gif
You could block that site, but there are probably other images that you don't
find annoying and want to see; blocking the server will block them all. I would
like to be able to add in the location of that one specific image to block.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 33467 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
Summary: Add site field in image manager. → Add site field in image manager
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 89904 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago → 20 years ago
Keywords: verifyme
QA Contact: benc
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•