Closed
Bug 247417
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Master Password Dialog still displays for those non-store password POP accounts
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: MailNews: Message Display, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: karenlhuang, Assigned: Bienvenu)
References
Details
(Keywords: fixed-aviary1.0, regression)
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
(deleted),
patch
|
mvl
:
review+
dveditz
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
(deleted),
patch
|
dveditz
:
approval1.7.13-
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
This bug is logged for tracing the rest issue/improvement for bug 245813:
So far, the fix of bug 245813 is:
After click "Cancel" from the Master Password Dialog.
It displays 3 times for those stored password POP accounts.
And it displays 1 time for those non-store password POP accounts.
Actually, from user point of view, Master Password dialog shouldn't display
for those non-store password POP accounts...(This is how Netscape 7.1 did)
Steps:
1) Setup 4 POP mail acocunts without "checked for new msgs at startup"
2) Setup 1 POP mail acocunt "check for new msgs every 1 minute"
3) Saved Passwords for 2 POP mail acocunts
4) Checked Preferences|Passwords|Use encryption when storing sensitive data
5) After select "Get Msgs", notice Master Password dialog displays for those
stored password POP accounts.
6) After select "Cancel"
7) Select "Get Msgs" for those non-store password POP accounts.
Actual Results: Master Password Dialog still displays for those non-store
password POP accounts
Expected results: Master Password Dialog shouldn't display for those non-store
password POP accounts.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
I used latest Mozilla 1.7 branch build (06-17)...
Reporter | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Version: Trunk → Other Branch
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 247623 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
This bug regressed between linux trunk builds 2004092205 and 2004092305,
indicating this is a regression from bug 219976.
Assignee: sspitzer → bienvenu
OS: Windows XP → All
Version: Other Branch → Trunk
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
I'd say this is a wallet bug. the xpcom frontend for wallet uses the enumerator
to get all the urls, usernames and passwords. In clear text. So the master
password is needed. Only after that, it goes to search for the right url.
It should look for the right url first, and then decypher the username and password.
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
Decyption should happen only if the uri's match.
Some might think of this as a hack. I think of all of wallet as a hack, so one
extra won't hurt.
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #151220 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Attachment #151220 -
Flags: superreview?(darin)
Attachment #151220 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Attachment #151220 -
Flags: review+
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 151220 [details] [diff] [review]
delay decryption
>Index: extensions/wallet/src/nsPasswordManager.cpp
>- nsCOMPtr<nsISimpleEnumerator> enumerator;
>- rv = GetEnumerator(getter_AddRefs(enumerator));
>- if (NS_FAILED(rv)) {
>- return rv; // could not unlock the database
>+ nsPasswordManagerEnumerator* enumerator = new nsPasswordManagerEnumerator(PR_FALSE);
who frees this enumerator now? it used to be COMPtr, which
would clean itself up after it goes out of scope.
> while (hasMoreElements) {
> rv = enumerator->GetNext(getter_AddRefs(passwordElem));
> if (NS_FAILED(rv))
> return rv;
here's an early return that appears to leak |enumerator|.
As for the core functionality change, I think you should poke
dveditz for a review.
Attachment #151220 -
Flags: superreview?(darin) → superreview-
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
Patch updated to darins comments. It's a comptr again.
Attachment #151220 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 154006 [details] [diff] [review]
updated
carrying timeless' review forward. dveditz can you sr?
darin: there isn't a real functionality changes. the patch only skips
decrypting passwords for entries that are thrown away anyway later, because the
url's don't match. The end result is the same.
Attachment #154006 -
Flags: superreview?(dveditz)
Attachment #154006 -
Flags: review+
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 154006 [details] [diff] [review]
updated
sr=dveditz
Attachment #154006 -
Flags: superreview?(dveditz) → superreview+
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
checked in
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•20 years ago
|
||
this should be checked into the aviary branch, right? If I don't hear any
dissenting voices, I'll check this into the aviary branch.
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 185786 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 236510 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•20 years ago
|
||
this is what I'll check into the aviary branch.
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 154708 [details] [diff] [review]
-up diff for aviary branch
getting on radar for 1.7.12
Attachment #154708 -
Flags: approval1.7.12?
Comment 17•19 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 306710 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 154708 [details] [diff] [review]
-up diff for aviary branch
out of scope for a security release
Attachment #154708 -
Flags: approval1.7.13? → approval1.7.13-
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•